Competency intelligence
Standards and state-rules crosswalk
Public psychedelic training frameworks, mapped against the twelve competency categories that organise Blossom's taxonomy. Each map is an independent, unofficial orientation aid, not a compliance checklist. It shows where a framework's requirements sit in the wider competency picture and where they are quiet.
Looking for something specific? Ask Blossom
Read this first
This is an independent, unofficial comparison built by Blossom for orientation only. It is not legal, regulatory, or compliance advice, and it does not represent the position of any regulator or professional body. Always work from the official rules and framework text before making any training, licensing, or practice decision.
Mapping as of July 2026.
- Oregon, USAReviewed mapping
Oregon psilocybin facilitator training curriculum
Oregon Psilocybin Services, Oregon Health Authority
Oregon's licensed psilocybin facilitator pathway rests on a 120-hour core curriculum plus a 40-hour practicum, structured around nine required topic areas. It is a supported-adult-use model rather than a clinical one, so the curriculum leans on facilitation, safety and cultural equity rather than medical treatment or research measurement.
9 requirements mapped · touches 11 of 12 categories
- Colorado, USAReviewed mapping
Colorado natural medicine facilitator training curriculum
Office of Natural Medicine, Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA)
Colorado's facilitator training rule prescribes at least 150 hours across fourteen named curriculum areas, each with a minimum hour count, weighted heavily toward ethics, physical and mental health, and Colorado's own rules. Like Oregon, it is a supported-use rather than a clinical model, and it adds explicit hour minimums the Oregon rules leave to programme design.
14 requirements mapped · touches 11 of 12 categories
- Australia & New ZealandReviewed mapping
RANZCP Psychedelic training framework for psychiatrists
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP)
Unlike the two US facilitator rules, RANZCP's framework is a clinical one: it sets the minimum knowledge, safety and hands-on competencies a psychiatrist should be able to self-assess a course against before prescribing MDMA or psilocybin under Australia's Authorised Prescriber Scheme. Its fourteen items span everything from pharmacology to supervised treatment of an actual patient and formal safety-and-quality recording.
14 requirements mapped · touches 12 of 12 categories
How to read these maps
Each framework is broken into its named requirements or modules. For every requirement we assign the best-fit competency categories, and, where the match is confident, we link individual competencies. The category assignments are the reliable layer; the competency links are deliberately sparing.
A mapped category means the framework names something that belongs in that part of the taxonomy. It does not mean the framework demands the same depth Blossom's trial-derived competencies imply, and it is not a judgement of quality. Two of these three frameworks are supported-use facilitator rules rather than clinical ones, so a quiet category is often a feature of the model, not an oversight.
The mapping is Blossom's editorial reading of public documents, done once and dated. If a framework changes, the map will lag until we revisit it, so always confirm against the official source linked on each page.