This cost-utility analysis, alongside a randomised controlled trial (n=174), compared subcutaneous ketamine (twice-weekly for 4 weeks) with midazolam in treatment-resistant depression. Including midazolam costs, ketamine raised QALYs (0.435 vs 0.352) and was dominant with an 89-91 % chance of costing < $50 000/QALY, but once these comparator costs were excluded ketamine was no longer cost-effective (ICER ≈ $108 500-$251 250/QALY, ≤ 5 % probability).
- Published
- Journal
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Authors
- Chatterton, M. L., Perez, J. K., Thai, T., Faller, J., Loo, C. K., Glozier, N., Barton, D., Baune, B. T., Mills, N. T., Fitzgerald, P. B., Glue, P., Sarma, S., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., Dong, V., Martin, D., Mitchell, P. B., Berk, M., Carter, G., Hackett, M., Hood, S., Somogyi, A. A., Rodgers, A., Mihalopoulos, C.