A living systematic review, meta-analysis and open-data resource of randomized controlled trials of psilocybin treatment for symptoms of depression
This systematic review and meta-analysis (s=15) of randomised controlled trials found that psilocybin-assisted therapy was linked to a larger reduction in depression scores than control conditions. The review included 801 participants overall, with 585 in the main analysis, but many studies were small or at risk of bias.
Authors
- Sandeep Nayak
Published
Abstract
Depression is a major cause of disability worldwide, motivating interest in psilocybin as a potential treatment. Here we present a living systematic review and open-data meta-analytic resource on psilocybin treatment for depressive symptoms. In this initial release, 15 randomized controlled trials comprising 801 participants are included in the database, with 12 of those studies included in our primary model (n = 585) using inverse-variance random-effects modeling of standardized mean differences on primary outcomes. Compared with control conditions, psilocybin showed a greater reduction in depression scores (Hedges’ g = −0.90). This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that psilocybin-assisted therapy results in substantial decreases in depressive symptoms across studies to date. However, many studies have small sample sizes or risk of bias. This living systematic review, meta-analysis, database and online dashboard (sypres.io) will continue to be updated as evidence emerges, providing a valuable resource for researchers in a rapidly evolving field.
Research Summary of 'A living systematic review, meta-analysis and open-data resource of randomized controlled trials of psilocybin treatment for symptoms of depression'
βBlossom's Take
Psilocybin was associated with greater reduction in depressive symptoms across randomised trials
SourcedWhat did the living meta-analysis find for psilocybin treatment of depression?
- 15 randomised controlled trials
- trials included in the database
- 801 participants
- participants in the database
- 585 participants
- participants in the primary model
- g = -0.90
- pooled effect on depression scores
Living systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, based on the paper's own synthesis. The pooled effect is from the primary model and should be read with the stated small-study and risk-of-bias limitations, not as proof of efficacy in all settings.
Expert Research Summary
Go Pro to unlock section-by-section summaries, Blossom's editorial take, and the complete research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Populationhumans
- Characteristicsmeta analysisliterature review
- Journal
- Compound
- Topic
- Author
- APA Citation
- Citation FormatsExport citation
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate research, and organize custom shelves.