Access and real-world use patterns of esketamine nasal spray among patients with treatment-resistant depression covered by private or public insurance
This retrospective analysis (n=535) describes the access and real-world use patterns of esketamine nasal spray among adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Of the pharmacy claims for esketamine, 34.6% were approved, 46.3% were rejected, and 19.1% were abandoned. The approval rate increased to 85.2% by the second treatment session. Among 273 patients who initiated esketamine (mean age 49.3 years; 66.3% female), the mean number of sessions was 11.8 over a mean of 11.8 months, with 47.6% completing at least 8 sessions, and 93.8% of those completing induction continuing treatment.
Authors
- Kruti Joshi
- Maryia Zhdanava
- Dominic Pilon
Published
Abstract
Objective
To describe access and real-world use patterns of esketamine nasal spray among adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) with private or public insurance.
Methods
Adults with ≥1 claim for esketamine nasal spray were selected from Clarivate’s Real World Data product (01/2016-03/2021). Patients with evidence of TRD initiating esketamine (index date) after 03/05/2019 were included. Esketamine access, as measured by pharmacy claim approval rate for each treatment session, and use patterns were described post-index (follow-up period).
Results
Among 535 patients with pharmacy claims for esketamine nasal spray (mean age 49.1 years; 65.4% female), 534 had the first esketamine claim being a pharmacy claim, of which 34.6% were approved, 46.3% were rejected, and 19.1% were abandoned. Main reasons for rejection included “claim not covered by plan” (57.1%), “claim errors” (52.6%), and “prior authorization required” (22.7%). The approval rate increased to 85.2% by the second esketamine treatment session. A total of 273 patients initiated esketamine (mean age 49.3 years; 66.3% female). Patients had a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 11.8 ± 13.3 esketamine sessions over a mean ± SD of 11.8 ± 6.4 months; 47.6% of patients completed ≥8 sessions (i.e., the number of sessions in induction phase) over a mean ± SD of 80.1 ± 71.9 days (per label, 28 days); 48 (17.6%) patients completed induction per label, and among them 93.8% continued treatment.
Conclusions
Initial access to esketamine nasal spray may be hindered by prior authorization or claim filing errors. Among patients who initiated esketamine, treatment compliance generally deviates from label recommendations; yet, most of those who received induction per label successfully transition to maintenance with esketamine.
Research Summary of 'Access and real-world use patterns of esketamine nasal spray among patients with treatment-resistant depression covered by private or public insurance'
Introduction
Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects a substantial proportion of US adults and, when pharmacological treatment fails on two or more adequate antidepressant courses, patients are commonly classified as having treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Esketamine nasal spray, approved in the US in 2019 in combination with an oral antidepressant for adult TRD, has shown rapid reductions in depressive symptoms in clinical trials and efficacy in relapse prevention. However, access to esketamine in routine care is constrained by payer prior-authorisation processes and by in‑office administration requirements: dosing must occur in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS)-certified centres with at least two hours of post‑administration monitoring and restrictions on driving, factors that may impede patient attendance and adherence to the recommended dosing schedule. Teeple and colleagues aimed to describe real‑world patterns of access to and use of esketamine nasal spray among adults with TRD covered by private or public insurance in the United States. Using an open claims database, the study sought to quantify pharmacy claim approval rates for treatment sessions, characterise reasons for claim rejection or abandonment, and describe how patients actually received and continued esketamine over time compared with label‑recommended induction and maintenance schedules. The intention was to identify potential barriers to initiation and sustained use in routine clinical practice.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Teeple, A., Zhdanava, M., Pilon, D., Caron-Lapointe, G., Lefebvre, P., & Joshi, K. (2023). Access and real-world use patterns of esketamine nasal spray among patients with treatment-resistant depression covered by private or public insurance. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 39(8), 1167-1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2023.2239045
References (2)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Chen, X., Hou, X., Bai, D. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2019)
Brendle, M., Ahuja, S., Della Valle, M. et al. · Future Medicine (2022)
Cited By (2)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Janik, A., Qiu, X., Lane, R. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2025)
Clemens, K., Pmhnp-Bc, A., Teeple, D. et al. · Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (2025)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.