Trial PaperDepressive DisordersTreatment-Resistant Depression (TRD)Psilocybin

Brain dynamics predictive of response to psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression

Using large-scale brain modelling and dynamic sensitivity analysis of resting-state data in responders versus non-responders, the study identified specific brain regions whose perturbation predicts a transition from depressive to healthy brain dynamics following psilocybin therapy. These regions co-localise with in vivo 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A receptor density maps, providing causal mechanistic evidence that serotonergic targets mediate psilocybin's therapeutic effect in treatment-resistant depression.

Authors

  • Robin Carhart-Harris
  • David Nutt
  • Leor Roseman

Published

Brain Communications
individual Study

Abstract

Psilocybin therapy for depression has started to show promise, yet the underlying causal mechanisms are not currently known. Here, we leveraged the differential outcome in responders and non-responders to psilocybin (10 and 25 mg, 7 days apart) therapy for depression—to gain new insights into regions and networks implicated in the restoration of healthy brain dynamics. We used large-scale brain modelling to fit the spatiotemporal brain dynamics at rest in both responders and non-responders before treatment. Dynamic sensitivity analysis of systematic perturbation of these models enabled us to identify specific brain regions implicated in a transition from a depressive brain state to a healthy one. Binarizing the sample into treatment responders (>50% reduction in depressive symptoms) versus non-responders enabled us to identify a subset of regions implicated in this change. Interestingly, these regions correlate with in vivo density maps of serotonin receptors 5-hydroxytryptamine 2a and 5-hydroxytryptamine 1a, which psilocin, the active metabolite of psilocybin, has an appreciable affinity for, and where it acts as a full-to-partial agonist. Serotonergic transmission has long been associated with depression, and our findings provide causal mechanistic evidence for the role of brain regions in the recovery from depression via psilocybin.

Available with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'Brain dynamics predictive of response to psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression'

Introduction

Vohryzek and colleagues frame their study around a broader challenge in systems neuroscience: although depression is associated with altered brain dynamics, it remains difficult to identify which dynamic features are most relevant to symptoms and treatment response. The paper notes that major depressive disorder is often linked to rigid, self-referential thinking and to abnormalities in resting-state organisation, including default mode network overactivity and reduced control network function. At the same time, prior work has suggested that psychedelic therapy may increase the flexibility and repertoire of brain states, but the mechanisms underlying clinical response remain uncertain. The authors therefore aim to use empirical fMRI data and large-scale computational brain modelling to identify brain dynamics predictive of response to psilocybin in treatment-resistant depression. More specifically, they ask which spatio-temporal brain substates distinguish responders from non-responders, whether a model fitted to pre-treatment data can reproduce these dynamics, and which brain regions appear most important for driving a transition towards a healthier post-treatment state. They also hypothesise that regions involved in successful transition will relate to the distribution of 5-HT2a and 5-HT1a serotonin receptors. The paper presents an exploratory modelling analysis built on data from a clinical psilocybin study and uses this as a test case for dynamic sensitivity analysis, with the broader implication that such models might eventually support mechanistic and personalised psychiatry.

Expert Research Summaries

Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.

Full Text PDF

Full Paper PDF

Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.

Study Details

References (10)

Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom

Dynamic coupling of whole-brain neuronal and neurotransmitter systems

Kringelbach, M. L., Cruzat, J., Cabral, J. et al. · PNAS (2020)

238 cited
Dynamical exploration of the repertoire of brain networks at rest is modulated by psilocybin

Lord, L. D., Expert, P., Atasoy, S. et al. · NeuroImage (2019)

183 cited
Increased global integration in the brain after psilocybin therapy for depression

Daws, R. E., Timmermann, C., Giribaldi, B. et al. · Nature Medicine (2022)

The therapeutic potential of psychedelic drugs: past, present, and future

Carhart-Harris, R. L., Goodwin, G. M. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2017)

Receptor-informed network control theory links LSD and psilocybin to a flattening of the brain’s control energy landscape

Singleton, S. P., Luppi, A. I., Carhart-Harris, R. L. et al. · Nature Communications (2022)

How do psychedelics work?

Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Current Opinion in Psychiatry (2019)

Effects of Schedule I drug laws on neuroscience research and treatment innovation

King, C., Nichols, D. E. · Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2013)

Psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression: fMRI-measured brain mechanisms

Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L., Bolstridge, M. et al. · Scientific Reports (2017)

Cited By (1)

Papers in Blossom that reference this study

Perturbing whole-brain models of brain hierarchy: An application for depression following pharmacological treatment

Socoró-Garrigosa, M., Sanz Perl, Y., Kringelbach, M. L. et al. · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2025)

Your Personal Research Library

Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.