Breakdown or Breakthrough? A History of European Research into Drugs and Creativity
The paper brings neglected European studies (1940s–70s) on mescalin, psilocybin and LSD to Anglophone attention and shows that differing labels (hallucinogens, psychotogenics, psychedelics) shaped researchers' aims and interpretations. It rejects simplistic notions of drugs as either dictating or liberating creativity, stresses the importance of set and setting, and argues that artists' intentional use of intoxicants more plausibly operates as a disinhibiting technique or "gaucherie" than as a reliable route to breakthroughs.
Authors
- ten Berge, J. T.
Published
Abstract
Language barriers have largely prevented American scholars from learning about European studies concerning drugs and creativity. An art historian reports on several Swiss, English, French and German studies conducted from the 1940s to the 1970s, offering new data in a research area that has been banned since drugs like mescalin, psilocybin, and LSD became illegal. Different views of the operations of these drugs, revealed by such terms as “hallucinogens,” “psychotogenics,” and “psychedelics,” appear to have colored researchers' aims to a large extent. The notions of drugs “dictating” or “liberating” the intoxicated artist are criticized by discussing the importance of set and setting. It is proposed that intentional drug use among artists expecting artistic breakthroughs while intoxicated, can be seen as a form of “gaucherie” or disinhibiting technique.
Research Summary of 'Breakdown or Breakthrough? A History of European Research into Drugs and Creativity'
Introduction
Anonymous frames the paper as a corrective history: language barriers have kept much European work on drugs and creativity out of American view, and the author aims to assemble and interpret studies conducted in Switzerland, England, France and Germany from the 1940s to the 1970s. The introduction sketches a long-standing cultural expectation—rooted in Romanticism—that psychoactive substances might enhance artistic inspiration or sensibility, but notes that anecdote and artistic myth have outpaced systematic evidence. Earlier experimental attempts to answer whether drugs stimulate creativity are described as methodologically diverse and fragmentary, and further research was largely curtailed after late 1960s drug prohibitions. The paper therefore sets out to recover and synthesise European experimental material, to question competing metaphors of drugs as either dictating style or liberating a true self, and to reflect on artists’ motives for using intoxicants. Writing as an art historian rather than a psychologist, Anonymous intends both a historical account of experiments and a close reading of artist practice under intoxication, emphasising the roles of set and setting in shaping outcomes.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topics
- APA Citation
BERGE, J. T. (1999). Breakdown or Breakthrough? A History of European Research into Drugs and Creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33(4), 257-276. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1999.tb01406.x
References (1)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Krippner, S. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (1985)
Cited By (3)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Baggot, M. J. · Preprints (2015)
Humphrey, D. E., Mckay, A. S., Primi, R. et al. · Imagination Cognition and Personality (2014)
Jones, J. A., Blagrove, M., Parrott, A. C. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2009)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.