Clinical trials for rapid changes in suicidal ideation: Lessons from ketamine
This review synthesises methodological lessons from ketamine studies to recommend how clinical trials can be adapted to evaluate rapid reductions in suicidal ideation, emphasising rapid outcome measurement and embedding psychological and neurobiological markers. The authors propose these approaches as a blueprint for testing rapid‑acting pharmacological or psychotherapeutic interventions for suicidal thoughts.
Authors
- Carlos Zarate
- Evan Ballard
Published
Abstract
Rapid‐acting treatments for suicidal thoughts are critically needed. Consequently, there is a burgeoning literature exploring psychotherapeutic, pharmacologic, or device‐based brief interventions for suicidal thoughts characterized by a rapid onset of action. Not only do these innovative treatments have potentially important clinical benefits to patient populations, they also highlight a number of methodological considerations for suicide research. First, while most clinical trials related to suicide risk focus on suicide attempts, new clinical trials that use suicidal thoughts as the primary outcome require a number of slight modifications to their clinical trial design. Second, the rapid onset of these new interventions permits an experimental therapeutics approach to suicide research, in which psychological and neurobiological markers are embedded into clinical trials to better understand the underlying pathophysiology of suicidal thoughts. The following review discusses these methodological innovations in light of recent research using the N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist ketamine, which has been associated with rapid effects on suicidal thoughts. We hope that “lessons learned” from the ketamine literature will provide a blueprint for all researchers evaluating rapid‐acting treatments for suicidal thoughts, whether pharmacologic or psychotherapeutic.
Research Summary of 'Clinical trials for rapid changes in suicidal ideation: Lessons from ketamine'
Introduction
Ballard and colleagues frame a pressing clinical gap: suicide risk is common and current treatments that reduce suicidal behaviour typically take weeks to months to show effects, while clinicians often need interventions that act within hours or days. The authors note that psychotherapies and most pharmacologic or device-based treatments are limited by slow onset, and that there is only one FDA-approved medication specifically linked to reduced suicidal behaviour, with other interventions (lithium, ECT) taking substantial time to act. In response to this gap, the paper uses the literature on ketamine — an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist and glutamatergic modulator with rapid antidepressant effects — as an illustrative model to examine how clinical trials should be designed when the primary outcome is rapid changes in suicidal ideation (SI). The review sets out to identify methodological considerations and recommend design features for “next‑generation” randomised clinical trials (RCTs) focused on rapid-acting interventions for SI. Using ketamine studies as a blueprint, the authors address participant selection, outcome measurement, and approaches for probing mechanisms of change, with the broader aim of encouraging standardised methods across disciplines for evaluating interventions that can alter suicide risk within hours to days.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Ballard, E. D., Fields, J., Farmer, C. A., & Zarate, C. A. (2021). Clinical trials for rapid changes in suicidal ideation: Lessons from ketamine. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 51(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12663
References (14)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Ionescu, D. F., Vande Voort, J. L., Niciu, M. J. et al. · Journal of Psychiatric Research (2014)
Ballard, E. D., Luckenbaugh, D. A., Walls, T. S. et al. · Journal of Psychiatric Research (2015)
Diazgranados, N., Ibrahim, L., Brutsche, N. E. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2010)
Grunebaum, M. F., Ellis, S. P., Keilp, J. G. et al. · Bipolar Disorders (2017)
Grunebaum, M. F., Galfalvy, H. C., Choo, T. H. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2018)
Ionescu, D. F., Bentley, K. H., Eikermann, M. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2019)
Murrough, J. W., Iosifescu, D. V., Chang, L. C. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2013)
Murrough, J. W., Perez, A. M., Pillemer, S. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2012)
Niciu, M. J., Shovestul, B. J., Jaso, B. A. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2018)
Nugent, A. C., Ballard, E. D., Gould, T. D. et al. · Molecular Psychiatry (2018)
Show all 14 referencesShow fewer
Vande Voort, J. L., Ballard, E. D., Luckenbaugh, D. A. et al. · Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (2017)
Wilkinson, S. T., Ballard, E. D., Bloch, M. H. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2017)
Zanos, P., Moaddel, P. J., Morris, P. J. et al. · Nature (2016)
Zarate, C. A., Brutsche, N. E., Ibrahim, L. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2012)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.