Compass Psychological Support Model for COMP360 Psilocybin Treatment of Serious Mental Health Conditions
This article describes the Compass Psychological Support Model (CPSM) used to support participants with treatment-resistant depression undergoing investigational psilocybin treatment. The CPSM aims to ensure a safe and meaningful psychedelic experience, complemented by therapist training, mentoring, and fidelity assessment to maintain delivery quality and consistency.
Authors
- Atli, M.
- Gaillard, R.
- Goodwin, G. M.
Published
Abstract
The psychedelic experience can be challenging. There is a need for a structured framework for providing psychological support to individuals with mental health conditions receiving investigational psilocybin treatment. The primary benefit of such a framework is to support a safe and meaningful psilocybin experience. It also enables future research on the facets of psychological support and/or psychotherapy that most optimally complement psilocybin treatment. The authors describe the Compass Psychological Support Model (CPSM), currently used to support participants with treatment-resistant depression in Compass-sponsored clinical trials of investigational COMP360 psilocybin treatment. The authors also outline the therapist training, mentoring, and fidelity assessment programs they have developed to ensure the quality and consistency of the CPSM delivery.
Research Summary of 'Compass Psychological Support Model for COMP360 Psilocybin Treatment of Serious Mental Health Conditions'
Introduction
Patient safeguarding during high-dose psilocybin treatment is presented as a central ethical and clinical priority because the drug commonly produces intense alterations in cognition, perception, affect, and suggestibility that can be therapeutic but also distressing or destabilising. Earlier research and contemporary trials indicate that psychoeducation, preparation, and psychological support are important to promote safety and allow participants to derive therapeutic benefit. However, the field lacks standardised, manualised approaches to psychological support, which complicates comparisons across studies and raises regulatory concerns about consistent delivery and minimising bias in trials of investigational medicinal products. Kirlic and colleagues set out to describe the Compass Psychological Support Model (CPSM), a manualised framework developed to support participants receiving COMP360, Compass Pathfinder Ltd’s proprietary synthetic psilocybin formulation, within Compass-sponsored clinical trials. The paper explains the CPSM’s principles and three-stage structure (preparation, administration, integration), and outlines the therapist selection, training, mentoring, and fidelity-assessment procedures devised to ensure consistent, high-quality delivery in the Phase 3 multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind programme for treatment-resistant depression across Europe and North America.
Methods
The CPSM is delivered by licensed mental health professionals with relevant training or experience and is explicitly designed to accompany investigational COMP360 psilocybin administration rather than to function as a standalone psychotherapy. The intervention is structured across three stages: preparation (psychoeducation, expectation-setting, development of support strategies), administration (therapist presence with minimal intervention, safeguarding and use of agreed support strategies), and integration (participant-led reflection and consolidation while monitoring for persistent risk states). Psychoeducation is provided both through preparatory materials on a dedicated platform and in therapist sessions. Materials cover psilocybin’s putative mechanism of action, subjective effects, safety profile, the procedural flow of sessions, and practical skills (for example breath and body-awareness exercises) that participants practise in preparation. Therapists review participants’ understanding, clarify misconceptions, and co-create a plan for support strategies to be used during administration. The psychological-support component is organised around three key principles: trust and psychological safety, present-moment focus, and self-direction and autonomy. Trust is established by exploring personal history, trauma, cultural factors, and current mental-state to foster empathy and confidence in the therapeutic team. Present-moment focus is practised via open-ended inquiry about moment-to-moment experience and exercises to reduce experiential avoidance, which the authors link to worse outcomes in psychedelic sessions. Self-direction is emphasised to protect participants from undue suggestibility; therapists are trained to avoid giving advice, interpreting experiences, or steering outcomes, while helping participants set and revisit intentions for the session. Methods of support are individualised and rehearsed in preparation. Agreed strategies include experiential practices, proximity adjustments (therapist sitting closer without physical contact), pre-consented simple touch limited to non-sexual contact to arm or shoulder when explicitly agreed, and brief verbal cues. Therapists are trained to distinguish manageable emotional processing from intolerable distress and to implement support strategies sequentially. In rare extreme cases, psychiatrist evaluation and rescue medication (for example benzodiazepines or antipsychotics) may be used; the authors note that such interventions were uncommon in prior trials (<1.5% of participants receiving 25 mg). To ensure fidelity across sites, the CPSM is manualised and therapists undergo a multicomponent training programme including online self-study, review of prior-session recordings, experiential role-play, group discussion, competency benchmarking, ongoing group consultation with Compass-trained mentors, and independent fidelity ratings by expert raters to avoid unblinding. The phase 3 fidelity-assessment results were not available at the time of writing.
Conclusion
The authors conclude that the CPSM was designed to provide a baseline standard of psychological support for participants in COMP360 psilocybin clinical trials that both safeguards participant welfare and aligns with regulatory expectations for clearly specified, consistently delivered non-drug components of an investigational treatment. They emphasise that the CPSM is compatible with many evidence-based psychotherapeutic approaches but is not intended to be a standalone treatment for treatment-resistant depression or other psychiatric disorders. Finally, the authors call for future research to identify which elements of psychological support or adjunctive psychotherapy most effectively complement psilocybin, with a view to improving, personalising, and widening access to care.
View full paper sections
METHODS
Establishing support strategies for the administration session. In preparation, the therapist and the participant discuss possible support strategies to be implemented by the participant independently or with the therapist's support when navigating challenging emotional shifts during the administration session. As described earlier, these may include experiential practices (e.g., breath and body awareness, visualization, and self-compassion) but also physical proximity (e.g., the therapist sits closer to the participant for a period of time, without the involvement of physical touch) or the use of verbal cues (e.g., "let go," "be open," "go in and through"). The use of physical touch for the purpose of reassurance and grounding is another option that the therapist discusses during preparation. Simple touch can reduce anxiety, but it can also, in an altered state of consciousness, be misinterpreted or trigger memories of abuse. Therapists are trained to approach this topic ethically and openly, first explicitly stating that physical touch will never be sexual in nature and will only include physical contact on the arm, shoulder, or non-interlocking hands. If the participant is open to physical touch as a support strategy, asking for and relinquishing physical support is practiced during preparation. During the administration session, physical touch is only employed in the manner that has been agreed upon and consented to during preparation. Here again, encouraging the participant's sense of autonomy is essential in enabling them to confidently decline support that may, under the influence of psilocybin, be perceived as crossing their personal boundaries. Following their discussion of possible support strategies, the therapist and participant collaboratively select and practice those that best fit the participant, as informed by their history, clinical presentation, and preferences. This support plan is reviewed and re-consented to by the participant at the beginning of the administration session, during which the therapist refrains from introducing new strategies. Supporting challenging emotional shifts and emerging trauma during the administration session. Emotions can shift quickly during the administration session. Additionally, participants can have traumatic memories emerge. Distress that the participant can process without unreasonable struggle should be allowed to unfold naturally. Therapists are trained to differentiate these normative emotional shifts from intolerable, dissociative, or otherwise overwhelming emotional reactions, and determine whether active support is necessary. If so, they implement support strategies one at a time in accordance with the plan and boundaries established in preparation. In extreme cases in which psychological safety is at risk (i.e., presence of acute unmanageable anxiety, psychotic symptoms), evaluation by a psychiatrist and the administration of rescue medication (i.e., benzodiazepine anxiolytics [e.g., lorazepam], antipsychotic medications [e.g., risperidone]) might be required. Nevertheless, data suggest that with proper support, participants are often able to navigate intense emotionally or psychologically challenging phenomena, and the use of such intervention is rare (<1.5% of the sample that received the 25-mg dose in previous clinical trials). Managing low-intensity experiences and disappointment. Some participants may report low-intensity administration experiences or notice little improvement in their symptoms following the administration session, irrespective of the dose received (which may include placebo or subperceptual, medium, or high doses of investigational COMP360 psilocybin). Subsequently, they may be at risk for experiencing despair or hopelessness due to unmet expectations. Therefore, in preparation, the therapist explores the participant's expectations regarding administration and outcomes and discusses plans if those expectations are not met. In particular, the therapist emphasizes that the relationship between the perceived intensity of the experience and clinical outcomes is still being investigated. Even when expectations are managed appropriately in preparation, participants having a low-intensity experience are more likely to be interactive during the administration session and thereafter express disappointment or anger. Therapists are trained to validate and make space for these experiences in ways consistent with the key principles of the CPSM and while maintaining clinical equipoise. This ensures that the delivery of the psychological support is consistent across all participants, regardless of the intensity of the experience and the assumptions the therapist or participant may have made about the dose received.
CONCLUSION
The CPSM was designed to support participant safety in clinical trials involving COMP360 psilocybin treatment and to address the requisite criteria for potential regulatory approval of this promising treatment modality. Compatible with most evidence-based psychotherapeutic approaches and based on clearly delineated elements, the CPSM is intended to serve as a baseline standard of care in this setting. It is not a standalone treatment for treatment-resistant depression or any other psychiatric condition. Future research on the facets of psychological support and/or psychotherapy that most optimally complement psilocybin treatment could inform new pathways toward improved, personalized, and accessible mental health care.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Populationhumans
- Journal
- Compound