Distinct trajectories of antidepressant response to intravenous ketamine
This open-label study (n=328) found that people who were depressed, for those with childhood physical abuse responded best to ketamine (48mg/70kg) treatment. This analysis was done retrospectively and the analysis consisted of breaking the group in three parts (responders, non-responders, responders with lower initial depression scores).
4 cited-by links indexed in Blossom
Authors
- Sanjay Mathew
- Brittany O'Brien
- Jaehoon Lee
Published
Abstract
Background
The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine is potentially effective in treatment resistant depression. However, its antidepressant efficacy is highly variable, and there is little information about predictors of response.
Methods
We employed growth mixture modeling (GMM) analysis to examine specific response trajectories to intravenous (IV) ketamine (three infusions; mean dose 0.63 mg/kg, SD 0.28, range 0.30 - 2.98 mg/kg over 40 min) in 328 depressed adult outpatients referred to a community clinic. The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR) assessed depression severity at baseline and before each infusion, up to three infusions for four total observations.
Results
GMM revealed three QIDS-SR response trajectories. There were two groups of severely depressed patients, with contrasting responses to ketamine. One group (n=135, baseline QIDS-SR=18.8) had a robust antidepressant response (final QIDS-SR=7.3); the other group (n=97, QIDS-SR=19.8) was less responsive (final QIDS-SR=15.6). A third group (n=96) was less severely depressed at baseline (QIDS-SR=11.7), with intermediate antidepressant response (final QIDS-SR=6.6). Comparisons of demographic and clinical characteristics between groups with severe baseline depression revealed higher childhood physical abuse in the group with robust ketamine response (p=0.01).
Limitations
This was a retrospective analysis on a naturalistic sample. Patients were unblinded and more heterogenous than those included in most controlled clinical trial samples. Information pertaining to traumatic events occurring after childhood and pre-existing or concurrent medical conditions that may have affected outcomes was not available.
Conclusions
Overall, ketamine’s effect in patients with severe baseline depression and history of childhood maltreatment may be consistent with ketamine-induced blockade of behavioral sensitization.
Research Summary of 'Distinct trajectories of antidepressant response to intravenous ketamine'
βBlossom's Take
IV ketamine response split into three distinct depression trajectories
SourcedWhich patients improved most after three ketamine infusions, and did childhood physical abuse differ between the severe depression groups?
- 328
- depressed adult outpatients analysed
- 3
- response trajectories identified
- 18.8 to 7.3
- baseline to final QIDS-SR, robust response group
- 19.8 to 15.6
- baseline to final QIDS-SR, less responsive severe group
- 11.7 to 6.6
- baseline to final QIDS-SR, lower severity group
Retrospective naturalistic study of depressed adult outpatients receiving three open-label IV ketamine infusions, analysed with growth mixture modelling. The figures summarise group-level trajectories and baseline scores, they do not prove causation, and the abuse finding is a between-group comparison within the severe baseline depression groups, not a randomised effect estimate.
Expert Research Summary
Go Pro to unlock section-by-section summaries, Blossom's editorial take, and the complete research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Populationhumans
- Characteristicsopen labelre analysis
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
- Citation FormatsExport citation
Cited By (4)
Papers indexed in Blossom that reference this study.
Shah, K., Herzog, R., Swann, A. C. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2026)
O'Brien, B., Lee, J., Kim, S. et al. · Psychiatry Research (2024)
Price, R., Kissel, N., Baumeister, A. et al. · Molecular Psychiatry (2022)
Medeiros, G. C., Gould, T. D., Prueitt, W. L. et al. · Molecular Psychiatry (2022)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate research, and organize custom shelves.