Efficacy and safety of low- versus high-dose-LSD-assisted therapy in patients with major depression: A randomized trial
This double-blind controlled trial (n=61) found that high-dose LSD-assisted therapy (100μg + 200μg) reduced depression symptoms more than low-dose LSD (25μg + 25μg) in patients with moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder (MDD), with benefits lasting up to 12 weeks and similar side effects between groups.
Authors
- Matthias Liechti
- Stefan Borgwardt
- Felix Müller
Published
Abstract
Background
This trial aimed to assess the efficacy of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)-assisted therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder.
Methods
This was a randomized, parallel, double-blind, low-dose controlled trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03866252). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive supportive psychotherapy and either 100 μg + 200 μg LSD or 25 μg + 25 μg LSD in two dosing sessions. The primary endpoints were the changes in scores on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, in the Clinician-Rated (IDS-C) version (assessed by the treating therapist) and the Self-Rated (IDS-SR) version, from baseline to 2 weeks after the second administration. The IDS scores were also assessed 6 and 12 weeks after the second administration.
Findings
Thirty-one patients were randomized to the low-dose group, and 30 were randomized to the high-dose group. At the primary endpoint, least-squares mean change (LSM) in IDS-SR scores was −3.9 in the low-dose and −11.8 in the high-dose group (difference: −7.9; 95% CI, −16.0 to 0.3; effect size: −0.5; p = 0.059). LSM in IDS-C scores was −3.6 in the low-dose and −12.9 in the high-dose group (difference: −9.2; CI, −17.1 to −1.3; effect size: −0.6; p = 0.023; corrected <0.05). However, significance was not reached after adjusting for baseline depression scores (p = 0.086). Both outcomes remained numerically consistent up to the final follow-up at 12 weeks. Adverse events were comparable between groups.
Conclusions
The findings of this exploratory study support further investigation of LSD-assisted therapy in depression in a larger phase 3 trial.
Research Summary of 'Efficacy and safety of low- versus high-dose-LSD-assisted therapy in patients with major depression: A randomized trial'
Introduction
LSD (lysergic acid diethylamide) is a classic hallucinogen that primarily acts as a serotonin-2A receptor agonist. Early uncontrolled studies from the mid-20th century suggested that a small number of LSD administrations could produce sustained antidepressant effects, but those studies had substantial methodological limitations. More recent controlled trials with related compounds such as psilocybin have shown antidepressant and anxiolytic effects after one or two high-dose administrations, and a previous trial reported lasting decreases in anxiety and associated depressive symptoms following two high doses of LSD in a palliative population. The precise mechanisms mediating these effects remain uncertain, and blinding has been a recurrent challenge in trials of hallucinogens.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Müller, F., Zaczek, H., Becker, A. M., Ley, L., Borgwardt, S., Santos de Jesus, J., Loh, N., Kohut, J., Auernig, M., Boehlke, C., & Liechti, M. E. (2025). Efficacy and safety of low- versus high-dose-LSD-assisted therapy in patients with major depression: A randomized trial. Med, 6(9), 100725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2025.100725
References (16)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
van Elk, M., Yaden, D. B. · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (2022)
Holze, F., Vizeli, P., Ley, L. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2020)
Rucker, J., Young, A. H., Jelen, L. A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2022)
Schindowski, E. M., Jungwirth, J., Schuldt, A. et al. · EClinicalMedicine (2023)
Davis, A. K., Barrett, F. S., May, D. G. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2021)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, M., Rucker, J. et al. · Lancet Psychiatry (2016)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Ross, S., Bossis, A. P., Guss, J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Holze, F., Gasser, P., Müller, F. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2023)
Show all 16 referencesShow fewer
Holze, F., Gasser, P., Müller, F. et al. · BJPsych Open (2024)
Raison, C. L., Sanacora, G., Woolley, J. D. et al. · JAMA (2023)
Grob, C. S., Danforth, A. L., Chopra, G. S. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2011)
Holze, F., Ley, L., Müller, F. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2022)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Vollenweider, F. X. · PLOS ONE (2010)
Bonson, K. R. · Neuropsychopharmacology (1996)
Cited By (1)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Erne, L., Mueller, L., Straumann, I. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2026)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.