Efficacy of intravenous ketamine treatment in anxious versus nonanxious unipolar treatment-resistant depression
This multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (n=99) evaluated the effect of ketamine (3.5 -; 35 mg/70kg) versus midazolam (3.15 mg/70kg) in anxious versus non-anxious unipolar treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The pilot results concluded that there was no significant effect found between both groups. In contrast to traditional antidepressants, the effects of ketamine may be similar in both anxious and non-anxious TRD subjects.
Authors
- Sanjay Mathew
- Gerard Sanacora
- Daniel Ionescu
Published
Abstract
Objective
To examine the effect of high baseline anxiety on response to ketamine versus midazolam (active placebo) in treatment-resistant depression (TRD).
Methods
In a multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 99 subjects with TRD were randomized to one of five arms: a single dose of intravenous ketamine 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 mg/kg, or midazolam 0.045 mg/kg. The primary outcome measure was change in the six-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD6). A linear mixed effects model was used to examine the effect of anxious depression baseline status (defined by a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Anxiety-Somatization score ≥7) on response to ketamine versus midazolam at 1 and 3 days postinfusion.
Results
N = 45 subjects had anxious TRD, compared to N = 54 subjects without high anxiety at baseline. No statistically significant interaction effect was found between treatment group assignment (combined ketamine treatment groups versus midazolam) and anxious/nonanxious status on HAMD6 score at either days 1 or 3 postinfusion (Day 1: F(1, 84) = 0.02, P = 0.88; Day 3: F(1, 82) = 0.12, P = 0.73).
Conclusion
In contrast with what is observed with traditional antidepressants, response to ketamine may be similar in both anxious and nonanxious TRD subjects. These pilot results suggest the potential utility of ketamine in the treatment of anxious TRD.
Research Summary of 'Efficacy of intravenous ketamine treatment in anxious versus nonanxious unipolar treatment-resistant depression'
Introduction
Anxious depression—major depressive disorder (MDD) accompanied by high levels of anxiety—is a common clinical subtype present in roughly half of people with MDD and appears particularly prevalent and difficult to treat in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Previous antidepressant trials, including large multisite studies, have reported lower remission and response rates in anxious versus nonanxious depression and greater suicidal ideation and side-effect burden in the anxious subgroup. Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist with glutamatergic effects, has demonstrated rapid antidepressant activity in TRD in multiple controlled trials, but evidence specifically addressing its efficacy in anxious depression has been limited to a few post hoc analyses with mixed signals. Salloum and colleagues therefore used data from a multisite, randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled trial of single-dose intravenous ketamine (four dose levels) versus midazolam to examine whether high baseline anxiety moderated ketamine's acute antidepressant effects. The authors hypothesised, based on prior post hoc reports, that subjects with anxious depression would show greater response to ketamine than those without high anxiety at baseline. The present paper reports secondary analyses testing that hypothesis, focusing on early outcome time points up to 72 hours postinfusion.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Salloum, N. C., Fava, M., Freeman, M. P., Flynn, M., Hoeppner, B., Hock, R. S., Cusin, C., Iosifescu, D. V., Trivedi, M. H., Sanacora, G., Mathew, S. J., Debattista, C., Ionescu, D. F., & Papakostas, G. I. (2019). Efficacy of intravenous ketamine treatment in anxious versus nonanxious unipolar treatment-resistant depression. Depression and Anxiety, 36(3), 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22875
References (5)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Berman, R. M., Cappiello, A., Anand, A. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2000)
Ionescu, D. F., Luckenbaugh, D. A., Niciu, M. J. et al. · Bipolar Disorders (2014)
Murrough, J. W., Iosifescu, D. V., Chang, L. C. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2013)
Sanacora, G., Frye, M. A., McDonald, W. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2017)
Singh, J. B., Fedgchin, M., Daly, E. J. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2016)
Cited By (6)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Mills, N. T., Nikolin, S., Glozier, N. et al. · British Journal of Psychiatry (2025)
Hietamies, T. M., Mcinnes, L. A., Klise, A. J. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2023)
Zheng, W., Yang, X. H., Gu, L. M. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2022)
Daly, E. J., Turkoz, I., Salvadore, G. et al. · Depression and Anxiety (2021)
Mcintyre, R. S., Rosenblat, J. D., Nemeroff, C. B. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2021)
Sartori, S. B., Singewald, N. · Pharmacology and Therapeutics (2019)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.