Evidence for tolerance in psychedelic microdosing from the self-blinding microdose trial
A placebo-controlled self-blinding trial (n=240) found that the probability of correctly guessing a microdose decreased with the number of prior microdoses (β = −.017±.007; p = .009), indicating tolerance development; this effect was significant for LSD/LSD-analogues (β = −.026±.007; p < .001) but not for psilocybin (β = .013±.014; p = .36), suggesting microdosers may need dosing breaks and that psilocybin could be better suited for long-term use.
Authors
- Robin Carhart-Harris
- David Nutt
- David Erritzoe
Published
Abstract
Microdosing is the practice of regularly using very low doses of psychedelic drugs. Anecdotal reports suggest that it may enhance well-being, creativity and cognition. Here, we use data from a self-blinding microdose trial, a large (n=240) placebo-controlled citizen science trial of microdosing to investigate whether tolerance develops during microdosing. We conceptualized tolerance as the relationship between correct microdose guess probability and the number of previous microdoses taken within the trial’s timeframe: if tolerance develops then, correct microdose guess probability should decrease with more microdoses taken. Mixed linear regression models show that correct microdose guess probability decreases with number of microdoses taken (mean±se: -.017±.007; p=.009**), suggesting that tolerance developed. Secondary post-hoc analysis revealed that this tolerance was present with LSD/LSD-analogue microdoses (mean±se: -.026±.007; p<.001**), but not with psilocybin microdoses (mean±se: .013±.014; p=.36). These results suggest that microdosers may need to periodically suspend their microdosing routine to avoid tolerance and that psilocybin may be better suited for long-term microdosing protocols.
Research Summary of 'Evidence for tolerance in psychedelic microdosing from the self-blinding microdose trial'
Introduction
Interest in therapeutic applications of classic psychedelics has grown sharply, with the best‑established model being psychedelic‑assisted therapy that pairs one or two supervised, moderate-to-high dose drug sessions with psychotherapy. A distinct and less-regulated practice, microdosing, has also become popular; although definitions vary, typical regimens involve very low doses taken 2–4 times per week (for example 5–20 µg LSD or 0.1–0.3 g dried psilocybin mushroom). Anecdotal reports and some observational studies claim benefits for mood, creativity and cognition, but placebo‑controlled trials have generally failed to find robust support for such effects, raising the possibility that reported benefits are driven by placebo or expectancy effects. Baumann and colleagues used data from their self‑blinding microdose trial to test whether tolerance develops during microdosing. The self‑blinding design is a citizen‑science, at‑home placebo‑controlled approach that allowed a large real‑world sample. The study specifically examined whether the probability of correctly guessing a microdose (used here as a proxy for noticeable subjective drug effects) declined as participants accumulated previous microdoses during the trial, and whether any tolerance effect differed between LSD/LSD‑analogues and psilocybin microdosing.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Baumann, S., Carhart-Harris, R., Nutt, D., Erritzoe, D., & Szigeti, B. (2022). Evidence for tolerance in psychedelic microdosing from the self-blinding microdose trial. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/s4qhf
References (17)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Anderson, T., Petranker, R., Rosenbaum, D. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2019)
Cavanna, F., Muller, S., de la Fuente, L. A. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2021)
de Wit, H., Molla, H. M., Bershad, A. K. et al. · Addiction Biology (2022)
Fadiman, J., Korb, S. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2019)
Richards, W. A., Garcia-Romeu, A. · International Review of Psychiatry (2018)
Holze, F., Ley, L., Müller, F. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2022)
Hutten, N. R. P. W., Mason, N. L., Dolder, P. C. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2020)
Kuypers, K. P. C., Erritzoe, D., Knudsen, G. M. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2019)
Madsen, M. K., Fisher, P. M., Burmester, D. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2019)
Nichols, D. E. · Pharmacology and Therapeutics (2004)
Show all 17 referencesShow fewer
Nutt, D. J., Erritzoe, D., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Cell (2020)
Polito, V., Stevenson, R. J. · PLOS ONE (2019)
Ray, T. S. · PLOS ONE (2010)
Rootman, J. M., Kiraga, M., Kryskow, P. et al. · Scientific Reports (2022)
Szigeti, B., Kartner, L., Blemings, A. et al. · eLife (2021)
Tupper, K. W., Wood, E., Yensen, R. et al. · Canadian Medical Association Journal (2015)
Yanakieva, S., Polychroni, N., Family, N. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2018)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.