Health Care Resource Use and Medical Costs Among Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Acute Suicidal Ideation or Behavior Initiated on Esketamine Nasal Spray or Traditional Treatments in the United States
This retrospective cohort study (n=14,912) examines healthcare resource use (HRU) and costs among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and acute suicidal ideation or behaviour (SI) initiated on esketamine nasal spray, ECT, SGA augmentation, or antidepressant monotherapy in the U.S. Esketamine-treated patients (n=122) had lower acute care HRU (0.59 days) and costs ($1869/month) compared to ECT (3.17 days, $4624) and SGA augmentation (0.92 days, $2163), but higher than monotherapy (0.32 days, $863). Esketamine reduced HRU (58%) and costs (50%) most significantly from baseline.
Authors
- Kruti Joshi
- Maryia Zhdanava
- Dominic Pilon
Published
Abstract
Purpose
Major depressive disorder with acute suicidal ideation or behavior (MDSI) is a substantial humanistic, economic, and clinical burden on patients. Data on health care resource use (HRU) and costs among patients with MDSI initiated on esketamine nasal spray relative to traditional treatments are limited. This study sought to describe HRU and medical costs of patients with MDSI initiated on esketamine, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), antidepressant with second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) augmentation, and antidepressant monotherapy in the United States.
Methods
Adults with MDSI from Merative® MarketScan® Commercial Databases (January 2016 to January 2022) were categorized into esketamine, ECT, SGA augmentation, and antidepressant monotherapy cohorts based on treatments initiated on or after August 5, 2020 (index date). Baseline period spanned 12 months before index date; follow-up period spanned from the index date till the end of data/health plan eligibility. Acute care HRU (inpatient and emergency department days) and medical costs excluding index treatment costs were described per-patient-per-month among all cohorts.
Findings
The number of patients in the respective cohorts was 122 for esketamine, 336 for ECT, 9958 for SGA augmentation, and 4496 for antidepressant monotherapy. Across cohorts, mean patient age ranged from 29.1 to 41.2 years, and the majority of patients were female (range, 57.2%-65.6%). During the follow-up period, mean all-cause acute care HRU was 0.59 days in the esketamine cohort, which trended lower than in the ECT (3.17 days) and SGA augmentation (0.92 days) cohorts, and higher than in the antidepressant monotherapy cohort (0.32 days). Mean acute care HRU decreased from baseline in the esketamine, SGA augmentation, and antidepressant monotherapy cohorts by 58%, 21%, and 37% and increased in the ECT cohort by 44%. Mean follow-up medical costs per-patient-per-month were $1869 in the esketamine cohort, which trended lower than in the ECT ($4624) and SGA augmentation ($2163) cohorts, and higher than in the antidepressant monotherapy ($863) cohort. Relative to baseline, medical costs decreased in all cohorts (esketamine, 50%; ECT, 22%; SGA augmentation, 17%; antidepressant monotherapy, 32%).
Implications
Acute care HRU and medical costs trended lower among patients with MDSI initiated on esketamine nasal spray versus ECT or SGA augmentation; HRU and costs reduced most from pretreatment levels among patients treated with esketamine nasal spray versus patients treated with ECT, SGA augmentation, and antidepressant monotherapy. Results of this study may aid physicians in determining optimal treatments for the vulnerable MDSI population.
Research Summary of 'Health Care Resource Use and Medical Costs Among Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Acute Suicidal Ideation or Behavior Initiated on Esketamine Nasal Spray or Traditional Treatments in the United States'
Introduction
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is common in US adults and is associated with an increased risk of suicide, particularly during major depressive episodes. Harding and colleagues note that nearly 50% of adults who experienced a major depressive episode in the past year reported serious suicidal ideation or made suicide plans or attempts. Patients with MDD who have acute suicidal ideation or behaviour (MDSI) carry a substantial humanistic burden and, compared with patients with MDD without suicidal ideation or behaviour, exhibit higher health care resource use (HRU) and costs. Recommended interventions for MDSI after disposition assessment include psychosocial measures and somatic treatments such as antidepressants (monotherapy or with augmentation, for example with second‑generation antipsychotics [SGAs]) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Esketamine nasal spray, in combination with an oral antidepressant, was approved in the United States on 5 August 2020 for depressive symptoms in adults with MDSI; phase 3 trials demonstrated a rapid reduction in depressive symptoms within 24 hours in this population. To address a gap in real‑world evidence comparing esketamine with more traditional treatments, the investigators conducted a retrospective claims‑based study to describe treatment patterns, acute care HRU, outpatient HRU, and medical costs among patients with MDSI who were newly initiated on esketamine, ECT, antidepressant with SGA augmentation, or antidepressant monotherapy, using a large US commercial insurance database. The intent was descriptive: to characterise HRU and payer costs after initiation of these index treatments and to compare post‑initiation outcomes with patients’ own pre‑index (baseline) period.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Harding, L., Zhdanava, M., Teeple, A., Shah, A., Boonmak, P., Pilon, D., & Joshi, K. (2025). Health Care Resource Use and Medical Costs Among Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Acute Suicidal Ideation or Behavior Initiated on Esketamine Nasal Spray or Traditional Treatments in the United States. Clinical Therapeutics, 47(3), 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.12.006
References (4)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Reif, A., Bitter, I., Buyze, J. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2023)
Brendle, M., Ahuja, S., Della Valle, M. et al. · Future Medicine (2022)
Canuso, C. M., Ionescu, D. F., Li, X. et al. · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (2021)
Zhdanava, M., Teeple, A., Pilon, D. et al. · Journal of Medical Economics (2023)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.