This randomized Bayesian adaptive dose-finding trial compared single-infusion IV ketamine 0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/kg with active-control midazolam in 33 veterans with late-life treatment-resistant depression. Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg had the strongest day-7 MADRS response signal and better day-28 response durability among day-7 responders.
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Singh, J. B., Fedgchin, M., Daly, E. J. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2016)
Evidence supporting specific therapies for late-life treatment-resistant depression (LL-TRD) is necessary. This study used Bayesian adaptive randomization to determine the optimal dose for the probability of treatment response (≥50% improvement from baseline on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) 7 days after a 40 min intravenous (IV) infusion of ketamine 0.1 mg/kg (KET 0.1), 0.25 mg/kg (KET 0.25), or 0.5 mg/kg (KET 0.5), compared to midazolam 0.03 mg/kg (MID) as an active placebo. The goal of this study was to identify the best dose to carry forward into a larger clinical trial. Response durability at day 28, safety and tolerability, and effects on cortical excitation/inhibition (E/I) ratio using resting electroencephalography gamma and alpha power, were also determined. Thirty-three medication-free US military veterans (mean age 62; range: 55-72; 10 female) with LL-TRD were randomized double-blind. The trial was terminated when dose superiority was established. All interventions were safe and well-tolerated. Pre-specified decision rules terminated KET 0.1 (N = 4) and KET 0.25 (N = 5) for inferiority. Posterior probability was 0.89 that day-seven treatment response was superior for KET 0.5 (N = 11; response rate = 70%) compared to MID (N = 13; response rate = 46%). Persistent treatment response at day 28 was superior for KET 0.5 (response rate = 82%) compared to MID (response rate = 37%). KET 0.5 had high posterior probability of increased frontal gamma power (posterior probability = 0.99) and decreased posterior alpha power (0.89) during infusion, suggesting an acute increase in E/I ratio. These results suggest that 0.5 mg/kg is an effective initial IV ketamine dose in LL-TRD, although further studies in individuals older than 75 are required.
This paper addresses the need for dose-finding evidence in late-life treatment-resistant depression, where ketamine response and tolerability may differ from younger adult TRD populations.
Randomized, quadruple-masked Bayesian adaptive dose-finding trial in 33 medication-free veterans aged at least 55 years with late-life treatment-resistant depression. Participants received a single 40-minute IV infusion of ketamine 0.1, 0.25, or 0.5 mg/kg, or midazolam 0.03 mg/kg. The primary endpoint was MADRS treatment response at day 7; day-7 responders were followed to day 28 for durability.
Bayesian adaptive randomization stopped the trial after 33 participants. Day-7 MADRS response favored ketamine 0.5 mg/kg over midazolam: posterior response probability 0.70 versus 0.46, with posterior probability 0.89 that ketamine 0.5 was superior. Day-28 durability among day-7 responders also favored ketamine 0.5 mg/kg: posterior probability 0.82 versus 0.37 for midazolam.
The authors conclude that 0.5 mg/kg is the best initial IV ketamine dose to carry forward for late-life TRD, while emphasizing small sample size, predominantly male veteran population, lack of participants older than 75, and exploratory biomarker limitations.
A single 0.5 mg/kg IV ketamine infusion outperformed lower ketamine doses and active-control midazolam for day-7 MADRS response and day-28 response durability in this Bayesian adaptive late-life TRD trial.
Zhang, J., Hashimoto, K., Li, S. · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (2014)
Zanos, P., Moaddel, P. J., Morris, P. J. et al. · Nature (2016)
Yang, C., Shirayama, Y., Zhang, J-C. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2020)
Murrough, J. W., Wan, L., Levitch, C. F. et al. · Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (2015)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Murphy, N., Tamman, A. J. F., Lijffijt, M. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2023)
Price, R., Kissel, N., Baumeister, A. et al. · Molecular Psychiatry (2022)