Ketamine versus ECT for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression
This open-label, randomised trial (n=403) compared the effectiveness of iv ketamine (35mg/70kg, 6x, 3w) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in treating treatment-resistant major depression (TRD). The results showed that 55.4% of patients in the ketamine group and 41.2% in the ECT group responded to the treatment, indicating ketamine was noninferior to ECT. ECT was associated with a temporary decrease in memory recall, while ketamine was associated with dissociation. Both treatments had similar improvements in patient-reported quality of life, with ECT having musculoskeletal adverse effects.
Authors
- Sanjay Mathew
- Gerard Sanacora
- James Murrough
Published
Abstract
Background
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and subanesthetic intravenous ketamine are both currently used for treatment-resistant major depression, but the comparative effectiveness of the two treatments remains uncertain.
Methods
We conducted an open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial involving patients referred to ECT clinics for treatment-resistant major depression. Patients with treatment-resistant major depression without psychosis were recruited and assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ketamine or ECT. During an initial 3-week treatment phase, patients received either ECT three times per week or ketamine (0.5 mg per kilogram of body weight over 40 minutes) twice per week. The primary outcome was a response to treatment (i.e., a decrease of ≥50% from baseline in the score on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report; scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depression). The noninferiority margin was −10 percentage points. Secondary outcomes included scores on memory tests and patient-reported quality of life. After the initial treatment phase, the patients who had a response were followed over a 6-month period.
Results
A total of 403 patients underwent randomization at five clinical sites; 200 patients were assigned to the ketamine group and 203 to the ECT group. After 38 patients had withdrawn before initiation of the assigned treatment, ketamine was administered to 195 patients and ECT to 170 patients. A total of 55.4% of the patients in the ketamine group and 41.2% of those in the ECT group had a response (difference, 14.2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 3.9 to 24.2; P<0.001 for the noninferiority of ketamine to ECT). ECT appeared to be associated with a decrease in memory recall after 3 weeks of treatment (mean [±SE] decrease in the T-score for delayed recall on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, −0.9±1.1 in the ketamine group vs. −9.7±1.2 in the ECT group; scores range from −300 to 200, with higher scores indicating better function) with gradual recovery during follow-up. Improvement in patient-reported quality-of-life was similar in the two trial groups. ECT was associated with musculoskeletal adverse effects, whereas ketamine was associated with dissociation.
Conclusions
Ketamine was noninferior to ECT as therapy for treatment-resistant major depression without psychosis.
Research Summary of 'Ketamine versus ECT for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression'
Introduction
Major depressive disorder is a leading cause of disability and a substantial proportion of patients do not respond adequately to antidepressant medications; treatment-resistant major depression is commonly defined as failure to respond to two or more adequate antidepressant trials. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has a long-established record of effectiveness for treatment-resistant depression but is underused because of limited availability, stigma and concerns about cognitive adverse effects. Intravenous subanesthetic ketamine (commonly 0.5 mg/kg) has emerged over the past two decades as a rapidly acting antidepressant option that does not require general anaesthesia, but its comparative effectiveness versus ECT and its cognitive safety profile remain uncertain, especially in patients without psychotic features and in outpatient settings. Anand and colleagues therefore designed a pragmatic, multisite randomized noninferiority trial (the ELEKT-D trial) to determine whether twice-weekly intravenous ketamine over 3 weeks was noninferior to thrice-weekly ECT over 3 weeks for adults with nonpsychotic treatment-resistant major depression. The principal aim was to compare response rates on a patient-rated depression scale at the end of the initial treatment phase, with secondary assessments of clinician-rated depression scales, remission rates, cognitive outcomes and patient-reported quality of life, and a 6-month follow-up of responders receiving clinically prescribed maintenance treatments.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Anand, A., Mathew, S. J., Sanacora, G., Murrough, J. W., Goes, F. S., Altinay, M., Aloysi, A. S., Asghar-Ali, A. A., Barnett, B. S., Chang, L. C., Collins, K. A., Costi, S., Iqbal, S., Jha, M. K., Krishnan, K., Malone, D. A., Nikayin, S., Nissen, S. E., Ostroff, R. B., . . . Hu, B. (2023). Ketamine versus ECT for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression. New England Journal of Medicine, 388(25), 2315-2325. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2302399
References (2)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Berman, R. M., Cappiello, A., Anand, A. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2000)
Rhee, T. G., Shim, S. R., Forester, B. P. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2022)
Cited By (5)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Cubała, W. J., Bajbouj, M., Bauer, M. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2026)
Lu, T., D'angelo, S., Tayebali, Z. et al. · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research (2025)
Aepfelbacher, J., Panny, B., Price, R. · Biological Psychiatry (2024)
De Filippo, R., Schmitz, D. · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (2024)
Rodgers, A., Bahceci, D., Davey, C. G. et al. · Australian and new-zealand Journal of Psychiatry (2023)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.