Optimizing real-world benefit and risk of new psychedelic medications: the need for innovative postmarket surveillance
This commentary (2024) highlights the promising results from late-phase clinical trials on psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy, suggesting imminent FDA approval and wider adoption in the USA. However, it emphasizes the crucial need for postmarket surveillance to ensure real-world benefits are maximized, and potential risks are mitigated. Without proper surveillance, there's a risk of incorrect conclusions, such as attributing adverse events to illicit psychedelics. Effective surveillance programs should monitor access, safety, and effectiveness across various domains, but current data systems are inadequate, necessitating intentionally designed surveillance mechanisms.
Authors
- Black, J. C.
- Monte, A. A.
- Dasgupta, N.
Published
Abstract
The encouraging results of late-phase clinical trials investigating psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy suggests that US Food and Drug Administration approval and subsequent expansion of use is imminent in the USA. Without fit-for-purpose postmarket surveillance to proactively monitor utilization by patients and providers, there is a risk that the real-world benefits of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy will not be realized. Incorrect conclusions, such as misattribution of adverse events to illicit psychedelics, may result from ill-designed surveillance programs. A successful surveillance program should monitor appropriate, equitable access for patients and inform reasonable limitations to improve patient safety. Multiple domains, including environmental factors, personal factors and relevant effectiveness and safety outcomes, should be incorporated. Current data systems that monitor drug use are generally ill-suited to address the unique needs for psychedelic surveillance. An intentionally designed mosaic of data systems is required to monitor the safety and effectiveness of psychedelic surveillance.
Research Summary of 'Optimizing real-world benefit and risk of new psychedelic medications: the need for innovative postmarket surveillance'
Introduction
Psychedelic drugs constitute a chemically heterogeneous group that alter behaviour, mood, thought and perception; the term is used in this Perspective to encompass serotonergic, entactogenic and dissociative substances. Black and colleagues note that while some compounds have long historical use and others are newly developed by industry or illicit synthesis, regulatory classifications (for example US Schedule 1) have been shifting alongside a growing international research effort. Late-stage clinical trials have reported positive results for indications such as major depressive disorder, treatment-resistant depression (psilocybin) and post-traumatic stress disorder (MDMA), and an MDMA new drug application has been submitted to the US FDA, but the FDA has issued draft trial guidance without parallel guidance for postmarket surveillance. This paper sets out to define the surveillance needs specific to psychedelic medications as they move into real-world clinical use. The authors argue that existing surveillance systems are poorly matched to the distinctive pharmacology, care models and socio-environmental influences surrounding psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy, and they propose a purpose-built, multi-component ‘‘mosaic’’ of data systems and measurement approaches to monitor real-world effectiveness, safety and equitable access.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Topics
- APA Citation
Black, J. C., Monte, A. A., Dasgupta, N., Jewell, J. S., Rockhill, K. M., Olson, R. A., & Dart, R. C. (2024). Optimizing real-world benefit and risk of new psychedelic medications: the need for innovative postmarket surveillance. Nature Mental Health, 2(5), 469-477. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00233-1
References (18)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Raison, C. L., Sanacora, G., Woolley, J. D. et al. · JAMA (2023)
Mitchell, J., Bogenschutz, M. P., Lilienstein, A. et al. · Nature Medicine (2021)
Mitchell, J., Ot’alora G, M., van der Kolk, B. et al. · Nature Medicine (2023)
Gastaldon, C., Raschi, E., Kane, J. M. et al. · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (2020)
Rucker, J. J., Marwood, L., Ajantaival, R. L. J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Müller, F., Holze, F., Becker, A. M. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2022)
Breeksema, J. J., Kuin, B. W., Kamphuis, J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Ching, T. H., Williams, M. T., Wang, J. B. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Simonsson, O., Hendricks, P. S., Chambers, R. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2023)
Rocha, J. M., Rossi, G. N., de Lima Osório, F. et al. · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (2021)
Show all 18 referencesShow fewer
Malcolm, B., Thomas, K. · Psychopharmacology (2021)
Vizeli, P., Schmid, Y., Prestin, K. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2017)
Vizeli, P., Straumann, I., Holze, F. et al. · Scientific Reports (2021)
Shen, H. W., Jiang, X. L., Winter, J. C. et al. · Current Drug Metabolism (2010)
Neitzke-Spruill, L., Glasser, C. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2018)
Golden, T. L., Magsamen, S., Sandu, C. C. et al. · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences (2022)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L., Haijen, E. C. H. M. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2018)
Morton, E., Sakai, K., Ashtari, A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.