Predicting the Intensity of Psychedelic-Induced Mystical and Challenging Experience in a Healthy Population: An Exploratory Post-Hoc Analysis
This re-analysis of a Phase I randomised controlled trial (n=89) investigated predictors of mystical and challenging experiences in healthy volunteers receiving psilocybin. It finds that dosage was the strongest predictor of intensity for both experience types, while older age was associated with fewer challenging experiences and neuroticism correlated with challenging experiences only at the higher dose.
Authors
- James Rucker
Published
Abstract
Introduction
In psychedelic therapy, mystical as well as challenging experience may influence therapeutic outcome. However, predictors of such experience have not been sufficiently established. Determining predictors of their intensity is, therefore, potentially beneficial in targeting psilocybin therapy for depression.
Methods
In a post hoc data analysis of a Phase 1, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-groups clinical trial, dosage, personality traits, affect, and individual data were analysed as possible clinical predictors. Eighty-nine healthy volunteers were randomised to receive a single dose of placebo, 10 mg of psilocybin, or 25 mg of psilocybin. ANOVA was used to analyse the relationship between dosage and mystical and/or challenging experience, and correlation analysis for all other variables.
Results
The intensity of both mystical and challenging experience was strongly associated with higher dosage. Age was negatively correlated with intensity of challenging experience. Correlation between identified personality traits and either mystical or challenging experience was minimal, with the exception of positive correlation between neuroticism and challenging experience at higher dose. Neither positive nor negative affect indicated correlation with the intensity of either type of experience.
Discussion
A limitation of this study is its post hoc, exploratory design; recommendations for further research are provided.
Research Summary of 'Predicting the Intensity of Psychedelic-Induced Mystical and Challenging Experience in a Healthy Population: An Exploratory Post-Hoc Analysis'
Introduction
Psychedelics are being actively investigated in clinical research, and during acute administration users commonly report profound subjective effects that investigators label as mystical and/or challenging experiences. Mystical experience (ME) is characterised by features such as ineffability, deeply felt positive mood, sacredness and a sense of unity; oceanic boundlessness (OBN) on the 5D-ASC is a quantitative measure closely related to ME. Challenging experiences include physiological arousal and psychological distress, and the dread of ego dissolution (DED) subscale of the 5D-ASC captures aspects of this domain. Previous studies and systematic reviews have linked ME to therapeutic benefit in multiple psychiatric contexts, but evidence around how ME and challenging experience predict clinical outcomes is mixed and the predictors of the intensity of these acute states remain incompletely established. Ko and colleagues set out to explore clinical predictors of the intensity of psilocybin-induced mystical and challenging experiences by analysing data from an existing Phase I randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The investigators examined dosage, five-factor personality traits, baseline affect, and individual variables (age, biological sex, prior psilocybin exposure) as potential predictors of OBN (mystical-like experience) and DED (challenging experience). A set of directional hypotheses was specified for dose, age, prior experience, sex, personality dimensions (notably openness and neuroticism), and positive/negative affect.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Author
- APA Citation
Ko, K., Carter, B., Cleare, A., & Rucker, J. (2023). Predicting the Intensity of Psychedelic-Induced Mystical and Challenging Experience in a Healthy Population: An Exploratory Post-Hoc Analysis. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Volume 19, 2105-2113. https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s426193
References (29)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Goodwin, G. M. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2023)
Kopra, E., Cleare, A. J., Rucker, J. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2022)
Holze, F., Vizeli, P., Müller, F. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2019)
Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., Mccann, U. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2006)
Andersen, K. A. A., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Nutt, D. J. et al. · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (2020)
Romeo, B., Hermand, M., Pétillion, A. et al. · Journal of Psychiatric Research (2021)
Knight, G., Rucker, J., Cleare, A. J. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2022)
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2008)
Show all 29 referencesShow fewer
Schmid, Y., Liechti, M. E. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Liechti, M. E., Dolder, P. C., Schmid, Y. · Psychopharmacology (2016)
Johnstad, P. G. · Journal of Psychedelic Studies (2021)
Neil, J. C., Nutt, D. J. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Carbonaro, T. M., Bradstreet, M. P., Barrett, F. S. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L., Haijen, E. C. H. M. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2018)
Smigielski, L., Kometer, M., Scheidegger, M. et al. · Scientific Reports (2019)
Maclean, K. A., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2011)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2011)
Haijen, E. C. H. M., Kaelen, M., Roseman, L. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Barrett, F. S., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Personality and Individual Differences (2017)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Kometer, M. et al. · PLOS ONE (2012)
Carbonaro, T. M., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Psychopharmacology (2020)
Garcia-Romeu, A., Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W. · Current Drug Abuse Reviews (2015)
Russ, S. L., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Maruyama, G. et al. · Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice (2019)
Kopra, E., Ferris, J. A., Winstock, A. R. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2023)
Aday, J. S., Davis, A. K., Mitzkovitz, C. M. et al. · ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science (2021)
Rucker, J. J., Marwood, L., Ajantaival, R. L. J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Szigeti, B., Kartner, L., Blemings, A. et al. · eLife (2021)
Cited By (8)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Gregorio, G. D., Basset, S., Manmohan, H. et al. · Research Square (2026)
Kirlić, N., Atli, M., Mistry, S. et al. · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (2025)
Roseby, W., Kettner, H., Roseman, L. et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2025)
Evans, J., Aixalà, M., Anderson, B. T. et al. · Psychiatric Research & Clinical Practice (2025)
Modzelewski, S., Waszkiewicz, N., Lukasiewicz, K. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2025)
Mathai, D. S., Roberts, D. E., Nayak, S. M. et al. · Journal of Psychedelic Drugs (2025)
Nicholas, C. R., Banks, M. I., Lennertz, R. L. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2024)
Kettner, H., Roseman, L., Gazzaley, A. et al. · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (2024)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.