Psilocybin

Predicting the Intensity of Psychedelic-Induced Mystical and Challenging Experience in a Healthy Population: An Exploratory Post-Hoc Analysis

This re-analysis of a Phase I randomised controlled trial (n=89) investigated predictors of mystical and challenging experiences in healthy volunteers receiving psilocybin. It finds that dosage was the strongest predictor of intensity for both experience types, while older age was associated with fewer challenging experiences and neuroticism correlated with challenging experiences only at the higher dose.

Authors

  • James Rucker

Published

Neuropsychiatric Disease And Treatment
individual Study

Abstract

Introduction In psychedelic therapy, mystical as well as challenging experience may influence therapeutic outcome. However, predictors of such experience have not been sufficiently established. Determining predictors of their intensity is, therefore, potentially beneficial in targeting psilocybin therapy for depression.Methods In a post hoc data analysis of a Phase 1, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-groups clinical trial, dosage, personality traits, affect, and individual data were analysed as possible clinical predictors. Eighty-nine healthy volunteers were randomised to receive a single dose of placebo, 10 mg of psilocybin, or 25 mg of psilocybin. ANOVA was used to analyse the relationship between dosage and mystical and/or challenging experience, and correlation analysis for all other variables.Results The intensity of both mystical and challenging experience was strongly associated with higher dosage. Age was negatively correlated with intensity of challenging experience. Correlation between identified personality traits and either mystical or challenging experience was minimal, with the exception of positive correlation between neuroticism and challenging experience at higher dose. Neither positive nor negative affect indicated correlation with the intensity of either type of experience.Discussion A limitation of this study is its post hoc, exploratory design; recommendations for further research are provided.

Unlocked with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'Predicting the Intensity of Psychedelic-Induced Mystical and Challenging Experience in a Healthy Population: An Exploratory Post-Hoc Analysis'

Introduction

Psychedelics are being actively investigated in clinical research, and during acute administration users commonly report profound subjective effects that investigators label as mystical and/or challenging experiences. Mystical experience (ME) is characterised by features such as ineffability, deeply felt positive mood, sacredness and a sense of unity; oceanic boundlessness (OBN) on the 5D-ASC is a quantitative measure closely related to ME. Challenging experiences include physiological arousal and psychological distress, and the dread of ego dissolution (DED) subscale of the 5D-ASC captures aspects of this domain. Previous studies and systematic reviews have linked ME to therapeutic benefit in multiple psychiatric contexts, but evidence around how ME and challenging experience predict clinical outcomes is mixed and the predictors of the intensity of these acute states remain incompletely established. Ko and colleagues set out to explore clinical predictors of the intensity of psilocybin-induced mystical and challenging experiences by analysing data from an existing Phase I randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The investigators examined dosage, five-factor personality traits, baseline affect, and individual variables (age, biological sex, prior psilocybin exposure) as potential predictors of OBN (mystical-like experience) and DED (challenging experience). A set of directional hypotheses was specified for dose, age, prior experience, sex, personality dimensions (notably openness and neuroticism), and positive/negative affect.

Methods

This was a post hoc exploratory analysis of data from a Phase I, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-groups clinical trial (EudraCT 2018-000978-30). Eighty-nine healthy volunteers were randomised to a single oral dose of placebo, 10 mg psilocybin, or 25 mg psilocybin (COMP360, a proprietary pharmaceutical-grade synthetic psilocybin formulation), with 12 weeks of follow-up in the parent trial. The present analysis used data collected before and immediately after the dosing session. Inclusion criteria allowed adults aged 18–65 who could complete study instruments in English; exclusion criteria included current or past psychiatric disorder (or first‑degree family history), recent psychiatric medication, substance dependence (excluding nicotine), specified medical conditions (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, seizure disorder), pregnancy, or concurrent trial participation. The extracted text indicates four withdrawals occurred, all from the placebo arm; the analysis sample comprised the 85 participants who completed the trial. Predictor variables were personality (NEO‑FFI; five‑factor model: openness, neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness), affect (PANAS: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule), individual characteristics (age, biological sex, prior psilocybin experience) and psilocybin dose. Outcome variables were the oceanic boundlessness (OBN) and dread of ego dissolution (DED) subdimensions of the 5D‑ASC, administered immediately after the 6–8 hour dosing session. Baseline PANAS and NEO‑FFI were completed one day prior to dosing. Statistical analyses were exploratory and conducted in IBM SPSS Statistics v28. Pearson correlations were used to assess associations between personality/affect and OBN/DED, stratified by dose group. The same correlation approach was applied to individual variables within control and treatment groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) tested the relationship between dose and the continuous outcomes OBN and DED with pairwise comparisons between placebo and 10 mg and between placebo and 25 mg; mean differences were to be presented with 95% confidence intervals. The investigators stated the study was not powered for definitive hypothesis testing and did not correct for multiple testing due to its exploratory post‑hoc nature.

Results

Eighty-nine participants were randomised to 25 mg (n=30), 10 mg (n=30) or placebo (n=29). Four participants withdrew (all from placebo) and were excluded from the modified intent‑to‑treat population, leaving 85 completers. Participants were aged 20–59 (mean 36.1, SD 9.06); 48 (53.9%) were male and 41 (46.1%) female. Thirty‑three participants (37.1%) reported prior psilocybin experience, distributed unevenly across arms (placebo 24.1%, 25 mg 36.7%, 10 mg 50%). Dose was associated with both mystical and challenging experience: ANOVA indicated higher psilocybin dose corresponded to greater OBN and greater DED. The extracted text states the intensity of both OBN and DED was strongly associated with higher dosage, and that residuals approximated normality, but the specific mean differences and full test statistics for OBN and DED pairwise comparisons are not clearly reported in the extracted material. Among individual variables, age showed a nominally significant negative correlation with DED when data from the 10 mg and 25 mg groups were analysed together (Pearson r = -0.28, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.03, p = 0.03), indicating higher age was associated with lower intensity of challenging experience. Biological sex did not correlate with either OBN or DED. Personality findings were largely null. Openness showed no correlation with OBN or DED. Extraversion, agreeableness and conscientiousness were not significant predictors of either outcome. Neuroticism demonstrated a positive correlation with intensity of challenging experience at the higher dose (25 mg) according to the authors, but the extracted text does not provide the exact correlation coefficient or p‑value for this subgroup finding. Baseline affect, measured by PANAS (positive and negative affect), did not predict OBN or DED in the analyses presented. Prior psilocybin experience was not significantly associated with intensity of mystical or challenging experience; the authors note that very recent prior use was an exclusion criterion and may have influenced this result.

Discussion

Ko and colleagues interpret their findings as evidence that psilocybin dose predicts the intensity of both mystical‑like (OBN) and challenging (DED) acute experiences in healthy volunteers, which aligns with several prior studies. They emphasise, however, that the escalation in intensity with dose appeared greater for challenging experience than for mystical experience, suggesting higher doses may disproportionately increase acute difficulty without a commensurate increase in mystical phenomena. The authors note that duration of a challenging episode may be clinically important, but their dataset captured intensity rather than duration and therefore cannot address this point. The negative association of age with intensity of challenging experience is presented as consistent with earlier work and interpreted as possibly reflecting psychological or biological changes with age (for example, improved coping skills) rather than a direct causal effect of age per se. Biological sex showed no relationship with the outcomes, in line with previous reviews. Regarding personality, the authors report no association for openness but a dose‑specific positive association between neuroticism and challenging experience at 25 mg, suggesting neuroticism might help identify individuals at greater risk of an intense acute challenge; the extracted text does not provide detailed subgroup statistics for this effect. Limitations are acknowledged: this was a post hoc, exploratory analysis that was not pre-registered and for which the parent trial was not designed; therefore the study may be underpowered and susceptible to both false‑positive and false‑negative findings. Selective analysis and lack of multiple testing correction are noted; the authors recommend replication in larger datasets. They propose alternative, economical data sources such as national surveys and citizen science projects to examine these relationships, and recommend future studies assess duration as well as intensity, include measures such as emotional excitability, and directly compare healthy and clinical populations. The authors caution that these findings have limited clinical applicability at present and cannot be straightforwardly extrapolated to patient populations; even if age or personality predicted adverse acute responses, ethical considerations would affect any policy about excluding patients from treatment.

Conclusion

In this post hoc analysis of a Phase I trial, the investigators found that higher psilocybin dose was associated with greater intensity of both mystical‑like and challenging acute experiences in healthy volunteers. Additional indications were observed for age (older participants experienced less intense challenging effects) and for neuroticism (higher trait neuroticism associated with greater challenging experience at the higher dose). The authors conclude that replication using larger samples—potentially via national surveys or citizen science—is warranted, and that while these findings are primarily of relevance to healthy populations at present, further study including clinical groups is needed before any clinical implications can be drawn.

View full paper sections

METHODS

Data were extracted from the clinical trial of Rucker et al(EudraCT number: 2018-000978-30). The authors of this analysis were granted access to relevant data by the Sponsor of the trial (COMPASS Pathfinder Ltd, a subsidiary of COMPASS Pathways Plc.). This was a phase 1, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-groups clinical trial in which 89 healthy volunteers were randomised to receive a single dose of placebo, 10 mg of psilocybin, or 25 mg of psilocybin, with 12 weeks of follow-up. The psilocybin used in this study was "COMP360", which is a proprietary pharmaceutical-grade synthetic psilocybin formulation, optimised for stability and purity, developed by the sponsor, COMPASS Pathfinder Ltd. The primary objectives of the trial were to assess the effects of psilocybin on emotional and cognitive processing in an exploratory design.

RESULTS

This study was exploratory and not powered to formally detect statistical significance. IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 28)was used to run the statistical analysis. A Pearson correlation was fitted to investigate the potential association between personality traits and affect, and outcome variables of OBN and DED, stratified by dosage group. For individual data, the same analysis was applied, but they were analysed according to control and treatment groups. Analysis of Variance [ANOVA] was used to investigate the relationship between predictor variable of dosage and outcome variables of OBN and DED, comparing the two mean difference [MD] of OBN and DED score between placebo and both 10mg and 25mg pairwise comparison. The MD will be presented alongside the 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]. Due to the exploratory post-hoc nature of the study, no correlation was made for multiple testing for the two pairwise comparisons.

CONCLUSION

The original hypotheses of this post hoc analysis predicted that in a healthy adult trial population, personality traits, affect, individual factors of age and prior psilocybin experience, and dosage would be associated with intensity of psilocybin-induced mystical and/or challenging experience, while the individual factor of biological sex would show no correlation with either. For the variable of dosage, data indicated that the intensity of both mystical and challenging experience is associated with higher dosage, supporting the hypothesis. This is in keeping with previous studies of this nature.However, the increase in intensity of mystical experience between dosage levels is less than that of challenging experience. This implies that higher dosages of psilocybin may correspond with increasingly challenging experience, without necessarily implying a corresponding increase in mystical experience. Duration rather than intensity of challenging experience may be a more clinically meaningful measure,although this was not captured in our data; for example, if a challenging experience is intense but of short duration, it is likely to be more easily tolerated. Challenging experience may provide a catalyst for new insights and/or emotional breakthrough that leads to clinical benefits, however more granular data about the nature and degree of individual challenging experiences than was available here is likely needed to unpick this hypothesis further. The results supported hypotheses for both biological sex and age. Biological sex was not correlated with mystical or challenging experience, similar to the findings in the systematic review of Aday et al.Age was negatively correlated with intensity of challenging experience, similar to the finding of Studerus et al,Kopra et al,and Russ et al,as we had hypothesised. This suggests that age may be a protective factor against psilocybin-induced challenging experience in healthy subjects. This likely reflects the influence of psychological or biological factors associated with increasing age, such as the development of better coping skills for negative or challenging experience, rather than age itself. Whilst this may have some relevance to recreational use of psilocybin mushrooms in a healthy population, the clinical implications are minimal. We cannot extrapolate these findings to patients and, even if age was found to be a useful clinical predictor, it would be difficult ethically to justify the exclusion of patients from a treatment on the basis of age, unless a serious safety signal was found in future trials. In contradiction to our hypothesis and studies of psychedelic naïveté by Studerus et aland McCartney et al,prior psilocybin experience did not show significant correlation with intensity of mystical or challenging experience. Our analysis may have been affected by the fact that those with psilocybin experience within one year prior to the study were excluded from participation. The hypothesis for neuroticism was partially supported; at higher dosage (25mg), a positive correlation with intensity of challenging experience was demonstrated, similar to the findings of Barrett et albut in contrast to the study of Studerus et al.Neuroticism, as measured by the NEO-FFI, may be a useful measure to identify those individuals at higher risk of challenging experience, although we cannot reasonably extrapolate from this sample into a clinical patient population. The personality trait of openness showed no correlation with either mystical or challenging experience, in keeping with the findings of Haijen et al,but in contrast to the findings of MacLean et aland Smigielski et al.The evidence in this area remains inconclusive and still warrants further study. The other personality traits -extraversion, conscientiousness, and agreeableness -were not significant predictors of mystical or challenging experience, thus supporting the hypothesis. The hypotheses regarding affect were unsupported. We find no evidence that affect as measured by the PANAS predicts the experience of OBN or DED.While the data available for this study did not include the factor of emotional excitability as referenced by Studerus et al,this would be an area for future study. As this was a post hoc analysis, our hypotheses were not pre-registered, and we may reasonably be criticised for selective analysis. Similarly, since the original trial was not designed to meet the needs of our analysis, we may have been underpowered to explore our hypotheses. Excessive variance may, in this case, lead to false-positive or false-negative findings. However, the advantage of this exploratory analysis is that it does allow an estimation of numbers needed for a more statistically robust study. Since repeating a clinical study specifically to explore these hypotheses is likely not to be cost-efficient, we might seek to explore these ideas more economically using national surveys on drug use and health data, as in Kopra et al.Another option is citizen science initiatives, by which data concerning psychedelic use under participants' own supervision can be collected for analysis with results being shared with these participants.This also provides an opportunity to explore duration of both mystical and challenging experience as a criterion variable, in comparison to intensity. Additionally, re-examination of personality traits and affect variables, as well as replication of the findings on dosage and age, with larger data sets might provide further insight. A study of these variables with both healthy and clinical population for comparison is also recommended as it could provide new insight for therapeutic application.

Study Details

Your Library