Predicting the outcome of psilocybin treatment for depression from baseline fMRI functional connectivity
This machine learning study (n=16) examines baseline resting-state functional connectivity (FC) measured with fMRI as a predictor of symptom severity in psilocybin-assisted therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Results show that FC of visual, default mode, and executive networks predicted early symptom improvement, with the salience network predicting responders up to 24 weeks after treatment.
Authors
- Robin Carhart-Harris
- David Nutt
- David Erritzoe
Published
Abstract
Background
Psilocybin is a serotonergic psychedelic drug under assessment as a potential therapy for treatment-resistant and major depression. Heterogeneous treatment responses raise interest in predicting the outcome from baseline data.
Methods
A machine learning pipeline was implemented to investigate baseline resting-state functional connectivity measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as a predictor of symptom severity in psilocybin monotherapy for treatment-resistant depression (16 patients administered two 5 mg capsules followed by 25 mg, separated by one week). Generalizability was tested in a sample of 22 patients who participated in a psilocybin vs. escitalopram trial for moderate-to-severe major depression (two separate doses of 25 mg of psilocybin 3 weeks apart plus 6 weeks of daily placebo vs. two separate doses of 1 mg of psilocybin 3 weeks apart plus 6 weeks of daily oral escitalopram). The analysis was repeated using both samples combined.
Results
Functional connectivity of visual, default mode and executive networks predicted early symptom improvement, while the salience network predicted responders up to 24 weeks after treatment (accuracy≈0.9). Generalization performance was borderline significant. Consistent results were obtained from the combined sample analysis. Fronto-occipital and fronto-temporal coupling predicted early and late symptom reduction, respectively.
Limitations
The number of participants and differences between the two datasets limit the generalizability of the findings, while the lack of a placebo arm limits their specificity.
Conclusions
Baseline neurophysiological measurements can predict the outcome of psilocybin treatment for depression. Future research based on larger datasets should strive to assess the generalizability of these predictions.
Research Summary of 'Predicting the outcome of psilocybin treatment for depression from baseline fMRI functional connectivity'
Introduction
Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide and many patients fail to respond to first-line treatments; those who do not improve after at least two adequate antidepressant trials are commonly labelled as having treatment‑resistant depression (TRD). Psilocybin, administered with psychological support in controlled settings, is under active investigation as a novel treatment for TRD and major depressive disorder. Although prior trials indicate clinically meaningful antidepressant effects and an association between certain acute subjective experiences (for example, mystical-type and emotional breakthrough experiences) and clinical improvement, treatment responses are heterogeneous and it remains important to identify baseline markers that predict who will benefit. This study set out to test whether baseline resting‑state functional connectivity (FC) measured with fMRI can predict subsequent symptomatic outcome after psilocybin treatment. Copa and colleagues applied a machine learning pipeline to whole‑brain FC features derived from an open‑label TRD sample (n=16) who received two psilocybin doses (10 mg then 25 mg, one week apart) and tested generalizability in an independent sample (n=22) from a separate psilocybin trial. The investigators aimed to classify responders versus non‑responders up to 24 weeks after treatment and to identify the FC patterns most predictive of early and late clinical improvements.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Copa, D., Erritzoe, D., Giribaldi, B., Nutt, D., Carhart-Harris, R., & Tagliazucchi, E. (2024). Predicting the outcome of psilocybin treatment for depression from baseline fMRI functional connectivity. Journal of Affective Disorders, 353, 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.02.089
References (23)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Aday, J. S., Davis, A. K., Mitzkovitz, C. M. et al. · ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science (2021)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Erritzoe, D., Williams, T. et al. · PNAS (2012)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, M., Rucker, J. et al. · Lancet Psychiatry (2016)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, &. M., Day, C. M. J. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Chandaria, S., Erritzoe, D. E. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2023)
Carrillo, F., Sigman, M., Fernández Slezak, D. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2018)
Daws, R. E., Timmermann, C., Giribaldi, B. et al. · Nature Medicine (2022)
Dos Santos, R. G., Hallak, J. E., Baker, G. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2021)
Garcia-Romeu, A., Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W. · Current Drug Abuse Reviews (2015)
Show all 23 referencesShow fewer
Horton, D. M., Morrison, B., Schmidt, J. · American Journal of Psychotherapy (2021)
King, C., Nichols, D. E. · Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2013)
Olson, D. E. · ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science (2020)
Palhano-Fontes, F., Barreto, D., Onias, H. et al. · Psychological Medicine (2018)
Pasquini, L., Palhano-Fontes, F., Araújo, D. B. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2020)
Peill, J. M., Trinci, K. E., Kettner, H. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Raison, C. L., Sanacora, G., Woolley, J. D. et al. · JAMA (2023)
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Roseman, L., Haijen, E. C. H. M., Idialu-Ikato, K. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2019)
Schindowski, E. M., Jungwirth, J., Schuldt, A. et al. · EClinicalMedicine (2023)
Sloshower, J. A., Skosnik, P. D., Safi-Aghdam, H. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2023)
Tagliazucchi, E., Zamberlan, F., Cavanna, F. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2021)
Walpola, I. C., Nest, T., Leor, R. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2017)
Cited By (5)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Thuery, G., Crossen, F., Mc Loone, D. et al. · Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology (2026)
Jacobs, E., Zahid, Z., Hinkle, J. et al. · BMJ (2026)
Silva-Costa, N., Pessoa, J. A., Andrade, K. C. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2025)
Rego Ramos, L., Fernandes Jr, O., Arruda Sanchez, T. · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (2025)
Coleman, J. A., Shinozuka, K., Tromm, R. et al. · Human Brain Mapping (2025)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.