Safety pharmacology of acute psilocybin administration in healthy participants
This pooled analysis (n=85; doses=113) of three randomised crossover studies evaluates the safety pharmacology of psilocybin (15-30mg). Psilocybin induced stronger effects at higher doses, with 25 mg and 30 mg doses showing increased anxiety. However, overall, psilocybin was found to be safe in terms of acute psychological and physical harm, with no serious adverse reactions reported, suggesting its potential safety for controlled research settings.
Authors
- Becker, A. M.
- Halter, N.
- Holze, F.
Published
Abstract
Psilocybin is being studied for its therapeutic potential in various mental health disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and addiction. Initial studies suggested that psilocybin is generally safe when used under controlled conditions, but more research is needed to better understand its safety profile. We report safety pharmacology data from a pooled analysis of three randomized crossover studies that included 85 healthy participants and 113 single-dose administrations of psilocybin. Single oral doses included 15 mg, 20 mg, 25 mg, and 30 mg psilocybin dihydrate. We investigated subjective effects, blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, acute and subacute adverse effects, reports of flashbacks, and liver and kidney function before and after the studies. The 20, 25, and 30 mg doses of psilocybin produced stronger effects than the 15 mg dose. Psilocybin at all doses induced higher “good drug effects” than “bad drug effects.” Only the 25 and 30 mg doses increased anxiety. Psilocybin elevated autonomic effects only moderately. Tachycardia (>100 beats/min) was observed with 7% of all psilocybin administrations. Body temperature >38° was reached in 7%, 9%, 17%, and 32% of the participants with the 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg doses, respectively. Kidney and liver function parameters were unaltered at the end of the study. Five participants (6%) reported transient flashback phenomena. No serious adverse reactions occurred. These findings suggest that a single administration of psilocybin is safe with regard to acute psychological and physical harm in healthy participants in a controlled research setting.
Research Summary of 'Safety pharmacology of acute psilocybin administration in healthy participants'
Introduction
Classic psychedelic psilocybin is under investigation for multiple clinical indications including depression, anxiety, addiction and certain headache disorders. Earlier controlled trials have generally reported tolerable and transient adverse effects, but uncertainties remain about the detailed safety pharmacology profile—particularly the incidence of challenging psychological reactions ("bad trips"), acute anxiety, flashbacks or hallucinogen persisting perception disorder (HPPD), and cardiovascular and thermoregulatory effects. The authors note that many patient studies lack frequent, standardised vital-sign monitoring, creating a need for more granular safety data collected under highly controlled conditions. Straumann and colleagues therefore performed a pooled analysis of three Phase I, randomised crossover trials conducted in the same laboratory to describe the acute subjective, autonomic and adverse-effect profile, and to examine kidney and liver function before and after study participation. The pooled dataset spans a representative clinical dose range (15–30 mg single oral doses of psilocybin dihydrate) in psychiatrically and physically screened healthy adults with no or minimal prior psychedelic use, with the goal of informing safety considerations for single-dose, infrequent psilocybin administration in a clinical research setting.
Methods
The analysis pooled data from three double-blind, placebo-controlled, random-order crossover studies carried out at the University Hospital Basel, comprising 85 healthy participants and 113 single psilocybin administrations. Washout periods between sessions were at least 10 days. Study 1 contributed 25 mg administrations (with placebo pretreatment sessions included in this analysis), Study 2 included 15 mg and 30 mg psilocybin doses among other arms, and Study 3 included a 20 mg psilocybin arm; only psilocybin-alone and placebo conditions were used here. Participants were psychiatrically and physically screened; exclusion criteria (reported elsewhere) included a history of psychiatric disorder, significant physical illness and limits on lifetime illicit drug use. The sample was 43 men and 42 women, aged 25–55 years, with 64% reporting some prior drug use and 48% indicating prior psychedelic exposure (mostly 1–10 uses). Psilocybin (analytically characterised, administered in opaque capsules containing nominal 5 mg psilocybin dihydrate; measured content 4.61 ± 0.09 mg per capsule) and matched placebo were produced under GMP conditions. Study 1 participants were aware they would receive psilocybin; Studies 2 and 3 were double-blind and included other psychoactive comparators. Sessions took place in a calm hospital room with one participant and one or two investigators; participants were monitored continuously for 7–12 h and had investigator access for up to 24 h. Primary pharmacodynamic measures included repeated Visual Analogue Scales (VAS; 0–100 mm) for "any drug effect", "good drug effect", "bad drug effect", "anxiety" and "ego dissolution" at baseline and multiple post-dose time points (including 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5–? and 24 h, with some variations between studies). The 5 Dimensions of Altered States of Consciousness (5D-ASC) instrument was administered to capture Oceanic Boundlessness (OB) and Anxious Ego-Dissolution (AED). Vital signs (systolic/diastolic blood pressure, heart rate) were measured in duplicate after ≥10 min rest and tympanic temperature was recorded. Predefined thresholds were used to classify hypertension, tachycardia and hyperthermia. Acute and subacute adverse effects were assessed with a 66-item List of Complaints administered before, ~12 h (7 h in Study 1) and 24 h after dosing; subacute effects were not recorded in Study 1. QTc intervals were measured in Study 1 at −1 h and +2.5 h around 25 mg dosing. Blood chemistry and cell counts were measured at screening and at an end-of-study visit (screening to end-of-study interval 161 ± 85 days; end-of-study blood sampling occurred at a median 28 ± 18 days after the last administration). Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated using Cockcroft–Gault. Participants were asked at the end-of-study visit about flashbacks, perceived overall valence of the experience and willingness to use psilocybin again. Statistical analyses used ANOVAs with dose as factor and Tukey post hoc tests, Fisher's exact tests for proportions, paired t-tests for before–after laboratory measures, and order (psilocybin-first vs psilocybin-second) was examined; significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
Subjective effects: All doses (15, 20, 25 and 30 mg) produced increases in general drug effects, "good drug effect" (VAS) and OB (5D-ASC) versus placebo. The 20–30 mg doses produced larger increases in "any drug effect" and "good drug effect" than the 15 mg dose. Proportions reporting "good drug effect" >50% were 79%, 91%, 88% and 96% at 15, 20, 25 and 30 mg respectively. Mean OB ratings were 24%, 31%, 41% and 37% across the dose range, and OB >50% occurred in 14%, 27%, 42% and 25% of participants at the respective doses. Negative experiences ("bad drug effect" and AED) increased at all doses versus placebo; "bad drug effect" >50% was reported by 14%, 18%, 42% and 32% at 15, 20, 25 and 30 mg, respectively. Anxiety (VAS) increased significantly only at 25 and 30 mg, with anxiety >50% reported in 7%, 6%, 17% and 11% for 15–30 mg. "Ego dissolution" increased dose-dependently; VAS >50% occurred in 46%, 67%, 75% and 89% at 15, 20, 25 and 30 mg. Mean onset, time to peak and duration of "any drug effect" across doses were 0.6 ± 0.4 h, 2.1 ± 0.8 h and 5.5 ± 2.1 h, respectively. No relevant order effects were detected. Cardiovascular and thermoregulatory effects: Psilocybin produced transient increases in blood pressure, heart rate and body temperature without clear dose dependence for blood pressure. Among all 113 psilocybin administrations, systolic blood pressure exceeded 140 mmHg in 50% of administrations and exceeded 160 mmHg in 6%; no instances above 180 mmHg were observed. Maximal recorded systolic and diastolic pressures were 180 mmHg and 115 mmHg, respectively. Tachycardia (>100 beats/min) occurred in 7% of administrations overall (by dose: 7% at 15 mg, 3% at 20 mg, 4% at 25 mg, 11% at 30 mg); the highest recorded heart rate was 140 beats/min. Tympanic temperature >38°C occurred in 16% of administrations overall (7%, 9%, 17% and 32% for 15, 20, 25 and 30 mg); the highest recorded temperature was 39.0°C and no hyperpyrexia (>40°C) occurred. QTc interval did not increase at peak response in Study 1; the longest single QTc observed was 481 ms at 2.5 h post-dose. Adverse events and follow-up laboratory tests: The List of Complaints showed significantly greater acute and subacute adverse-effect scores after psilocybin than after placebo, with similar overall counts across the four doses. Common acute complaints included fatigue, poor concentration, headache, lethargy, vertigo, weakness, decreased appetite and nausea; common subacute complaints at 24 h included tiredness, headache, lack of energy and neck pain. Acute anxiety on the List was reported by 7%, 6%, 38% and 21% at 15, 20, 25 and 30 mg respectively. Five participants (6%) reported transient flashbacks; four experienced a single episode approximately 10–72 h post-dose (mean 30 ± 29 h) and one reported recurring, non-disruptive visual flashbacks over several months. No cases meeting criteria for HPPD were identified and no serious adverse reactions occurred. Spontaneously reported events within 48 h included headache (10% after psilocybin, 7% after placebo), depressive mood (4% vs 0%), nausea (3% vs 0%) and several other low-frequency events. Laboratory measures: Creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, alanine aminotransferase and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase were unchanged at the end-of-study visit (mean 28 ± 18 days after last administration) compared with screening. Haemoglobin decreased consistent with cumulative blood loss during study sampling; red and white cell counts were unchanged. Peak plasma psilocin concentrations and AUCs are reported in tables but the detailed pharmacokinetics are described elsewhere. Participant experience and willingness to repeat: At study end, 87% of participants rated the overall psilocybin experience as positive, 11% neutral and 2% negative. Eighty-two percent stated they would consider taking psilocybin again, 15% said they might, and 2% would probably not take it again. Preferences about setting varied (clinical study, recreational with friends, in nature), and about half reported prior psychedelic experience influenced their study session.
Discussion
Straumann and colleagues interpret the pooled findings as indicating that single oral doses of psilocybin up to 30 mg produce predominantly positive acute subjective effects in healthy, screened adults, with transient and generally manageable physiological activation. The 20–30 mg doses produced stronger positive subjective effects than 15 mg, while appreciable anxiety occurred primarily at 25 and 30 mg. "Ego dissolution" increased with dose and correlated more with positive than negative valence. Pharmacodynamically, onset and total duration corroborated previous reports (onset ~20–40 min; duration <6 h) though time-to-peak was longer in this pooled dataset (~2 h) than some prior accounts. Cardiovascular activation was mild compared with stimulants such as MDMA and comparable to LSD at psychoactive doses; no instances of extreme hypertension or hyperpyrexia occurred and QTc prolongation was not observed in Study 1. The authors emphasise that acute adverse effects—fatigue, headache, nausea and transient anxiety—were common but typically transient and did not require benzodiazepine rescue in these sessions. Flashbacks occurred in a small minority (6%), were mostly single and transient, and no cases of HPPD were detected within the follow-up period. Liver and kidney function tests showed no clinically relevant changes at an average of about one month after dosing. Key limitations acknowledged include pooling studies with different participants and protocols (Study 1 lacked placebo control and assessed fewer late time points), the inclusion of sessions with other psychoactive compounds in the original trials (though order effects were not detected), a predominantly young and physically healthy sample, limited prior psychedelic exposure in participants, modest overall sample size (85 participants, 113 administrations) that is insufficient to detect rare adverse events (incidence 0.1–1% or <0.1%), lack of long-term follow-up, and absence of analyses of individual pharmacokinetic variability or detailed risk-factor modelling. The investigators note that risks might differ in more heterogeneous or clinical populations and recommend further research to characterise safety in patients and to identify predictors of adverse responses (previous work suggests pre-session emotional excitability may predict unpleasant reactions). Concluding, the pooled data support that single-dose, infrequent psilocybin administration in a controlled clinical setting appears to be safe with respect to acute psychological and physical harm in healthy participants, but the authors caution that additional study is required to define risks and benefits in patient populations and to detect rare adverse events.
Conclusion
Single-dose administrations of psilocybin up to 30 mg were judged by the study team to be safe regarding acute psychological and physical harm in psychiatrically and physically healthy participants when delivered in a controlled clinical research setting. Psilocybin induced mostly positive subjective effects, mild cardiovascular stimulation and transient adverse effects including fatigue, headache and occasional anxiety; flashbacks were infrequent and typically transient. The authors state that these safety data do not raise concerns for single, infrequent doses in controlled conditions but emphasise that further research is needed to evaluate risks and benefits in clinical populations and to identify rare or longer-term adverse outcomes.
View full paper sections
INTRODUCTION
Psilocybin is a classic psychedelic that is used recreationally and has been investigated clinically as a medication for patients with depression, anxiety, addiction, cluster headache, and migraine. Additional indications are under investigation. The future medical use of psilocybin will depend on its safety and efficacy. Initial studies suggested that psilocybin is generally safe when used under controlled conditions. Although various recent Phase 2 clinical trials showed mostly mild and transient adverse effects, more information on clinical safety is needed. Safety concerns include challenging experiences (i.e., "bad trips"), acute anxiety, flashbacks, and hallucinogen perception disorder (HPPD). Cardiovascular stimulation has been reported in both healthy participants and patients, but studies in patients do not typically allow frequent and well-standardized assessments of vital signs. The present analysis provided additional highly controlled data on the safety pharmacology of single-dose administrations of psilocybin. The aim of the present study was to describe acute subjective, autonomic, and adverse effects during the acute and subacute psilocybin response and blood laboratory markers of kidney and liver function at both the start and end of the study. These data were collected from a series of clinical Phase 1 trials in healthy participants that were conducted in the same laboratory and used the same highly standardized data recording methods. The studies used a representative dose range of psilocybin from moderate-low (15 mg) to moderate (20 mg) to moderate-high (25 mg) to high (30 mg) experiential doses as used in psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o fand in people with no or minimal prior psilocybin use, which is also likely the case when psilocybin is used in patients.
STUDY DESIGN
This was a pooled analysis of three double-blind, placebo-controlled, random-order, crossover studies in healthy participants. All trials were previously published in detail. All studies were conducted at the University Hospital Basel and included a total of 85 participants who were all psychiatrically and physically screened and healthy. The aim of the present analysis was to assess the safety pharmacology of single-dose administrations of psilocybin in healthy participants with no regular psychedelic use and no or minimal prior use. The first study (Study 1)included 24 healthy participants who received two single administrations of 25 mg psilocybin with placebo or escitalopram pretreatment. Only the administration of placebo as a pretreatment was used in the present analysis. The second study (Study 2)included 28 healthy participants who received two administrations of psilocybin (15 and 30 mg), two administrations of LSD, and placebo. Study 3included 33 healthy participants who received a single dose each of LSD, mescaline, 20 mg psilocybin, and placebo. Only the psilocybin alone and placebo conditions were used for the present analysis. Overall, all three studies encompassed a total of 113 psilocybin administrations. In all studies, the washout periods between single-dose administrations were at least 10 days to reduce possible carryover effects. The studies were all registered at ClinicalTrials.gov from all participants who were included in the studies. All participants were paid for their participation.
PARTICIPANTS
The characteristics of the study participants are shown in Table. A total of 85 healthy participants (43 men, 42 women), 25-55 years old (mean ± SD = 32 ± 8 years; range: 25-55 years), were mostly recruited from the University of Basel campus and included in the studies. The mean ± SD (range) ages were 34 ± 10 (25-55) years, 35 ± 9 (25-52) years, and 29 ± 4 (25-44) years for Study 1, Study 2, and Study 3, respectively. The mean ± SD body weight was 71 ± 11 kg (range: 50-112 kg). Thirty-three participants received a single dose of psilocybin only, and 52 participants received two single-dose administrations of psilocybin (28 at two different doses, 15 and 30 mg; 24 at the same dose, 25 mg; only the session with placebo as the pretreatment was used). Exclusion criteria were reported in detail elsewhereand included a history of psychiatric disorders, physical illness, a lifetime history of using illicit drugs more than 10 times (with the exception of past cannabis use) for Studies 1 and 2, a lifetime history of using psychedelic drugs more than 20 times for Study 3, illicit drug use within the last 2 months, and illicit drug use during the study, determined by urine tests that were conducted before the test sessions. Fifty-four participants (64%) had prior drug experience (1-100 times), of which 41 participants (48%) had previously used a psychedelic (1-10 times). Further substance experiences included methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; 42 participants [49%], 1-30 times), amphetamine (23 participants [27%], 1-50 times), cocaine (18 participants [21%], 1-100 times), methylphenidate (four participants [5%], 1-2 times), 4-Bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine (2C-B; three participants [4%], 1-2 times), ketamine (five participants [6%], 1-5 times), and nitrous oxide (11 participants [13%], 1-20 times).
STUDY DRUG
J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Psilocybin (99.7% purity, determined by high-performance liquid chromatography; ReseaChem GmbH, Burgdorf, Switzerland) was administered as opaque capsules that contained 5 mg psilocybin dihydrate and an exact analytically confirmed psilocybin content of 4.61 ± 0.09 mg (mean ± SD, n = 10 samples). Placebo consisted of identical opaque capsules that were filled with mannitol. All drug products were produced according to good manufacturing practice (GMP) by a licensed GMP facility (Apotheke Dr.. Stability of the psilocybin formulation was confirmed for the study durations. In Study 1, the participants knew they would receive psilocybin. Studies 2 and 3 were doubleblind and included inactive placebo and other psychoactive substances. At the end of the study, blinding was assessed.
STUDY PROCEDURES
All studies included a screening visit, two to five test sessions (each separated by at least 10 days), and an end-of-study visit. The sessions were conducted in a calm standard hospital room that was equipped with a hospital bed for the participant and a desk and chair for the investigator. The room had an adjoining balcony that participants were allowed to access after peak effects had subsided in company of the investigator. Only one research participant and one or two investigators were present during each test session. Participants were allowed to bring their own music and occupy their time for when effects had subsided or for days in which placebo was administered (e.g., book, laptop, games, etc.). Blindfolds were provided upon request. The test sessions began at approximately 8:00 AM. Individual emotional states were assessed before drug administration to exclude risk factors for emotional disturbances. This procedure consisted of several questions, including "Did anything unusual happen lately?," "Do you feel stressed for any reason (personal or professional)?," "Did you have any sleep disturbances lately?," "Do you have any expectations or fear regarding today's session?," and "Are you feeling ready to participate today?" If any of these questions were answered with "yes" (or "no" for the last question), J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f then the reason was discussed. If the investigator had any doubt, then the session was rescheduled to ensure that none of the participants were in an unfavorable state of mind when taking psilocybin. The participants then underwent baseline measurements, including vital signs. Psilocybin or placebo was administered at approximately 9:00 AM. The participants were never alone during the next 7-12 h after drug administration, and an investigator was in a room next to the participant for up to 24 h (except for Study 1, in which participants were sent home after 7 h, accompanied by a friend or family member).
PHARMACODYNAMIC MEASURES
Visual Analog Scales (VASs) were repeatedly used to assess subjective effects over time. The VASs included "any drug effect," "good drug effect," "bad drug effect," "anxiety," and "ego dissolution". The VASs were presented as 100-mm horizontal lines (0-100%), marked from "not at all" on the left to "extremely" on the right. The VASs were applied before and 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1., and 24 h after psilocybin or placebo administration. In Study 1, the 3.5 h time point and all time points after 7 h were not assessed. Severe anxiety was defined as > 75% on the "anxiety" VAS. The 5 Dimensions of Altered States of Consciousness (5D-ASC) scalewas administered 24 h (or 7 h in Study 1) after drug administration to retrospectively rate peak drug effects. The "Oceanic Boundlessness" (OB) and "Anxious Ego-Dissolution" (AED) dimensions are reported herein and serve to describe overall rather positive and negative alterations of mind, respectively. Blood pressure, heart rate, and body temperature were assessed repeatedly at the same time points when the VASs were administered. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were measured using an automatic oscillometric device (OMRON Healthcare Europe NA, Hoofddorp, Netherlands). The measurements were performed in duplicate at an interval of 1 min and after a resting time of at least 10 min. Averages were used for further J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f analysis. Core (tympanic) temperature was measured using a Braun ThermoScan ear thermometer (Welch Allyn, Skaneateles Falls, NY, USA). Criteria for grouping participants into proportions with a certain degree of autonomic stimulation were diastolic blood pressure > 90 and > 100 mmHg and systolic blood pressure > 140, > 160, and > 180 mmHg. Tachycardia was defined as > 100 beats/min. Hyperthermia and hyperpyrexia were defined as tympanic body temperature > 38C and 40°C, respectively. Acute and subacute adverse effects were assessed using the List of Complaints. The scale consists of 66 items, yielding a total adverse effects score (non-weighted sum of all items) that reliably measures physical and general discomfort. The List of Complaints was administered before and 12 h (7 h for Study 1; acute adverse effects) and 24 h (subacute adverse effects) after psilocybin or placebo administration. Subacute adverse effects were not recorded in Study 1. Additionally, participants were asked at the beginning of each study session and at the end of study visit to report any adverse events from 24 h after drug administration until the next study visit. Adverse events were evaluated with a study physician. In Study 1, QT times were measured, and QTc times were calculated and compared 1 h before and 2.5 h after the administration of 25 mg psilocybin.
BLOOD SAMPLING AND END-OF-STUDY VISIT
Blood chemistry and blood cell count tests were performed at the screening visit at the start of the study and at the end-of-study visit, which were separated by 161 ± 85 days (mean ± SD). The end-of-study visit, including blood sampling, occurred at variable time intervals (28 ± 18 days) after the last substance administration. The analyses were performed using standard assays according to Good Laboratory Practice by the Laboratory Medicine Department of the hospital. The glomerular filtration rate was determined by the Cockcroft-Gault Equation using plasma creatinine concentrations, age, and sex of the participant. At the end-of-study visit, the participants were asked to retrospectively rate J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f whether the experience was positive or negative, whether earlier experiences with substances had an influence on the psilocybin experience, and whether they considered taking psilocybin again and in what setting. The participants were also asked whether they experienced "flashbacks" or any other change in perception (e.g., alterations of spatial perception, color vision, or patterns) and how long they lasted. "Flashbacks" were defined as temporary reoccurrence of the altered state of consciousness. Persistent changes in perception would have led to further assessments of possible hallucinogen perception disorder. This was assessed in a structured manner only at the end-of-study visit; therefore, we only report "flashback" phenomena that occurred until the end-of-study visit. "Flashbacks" that occurred outside this time period were not assessed.
STATISTICAL ANALYSES
The statistical analyses were performed using R 4.2.1 software (RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA, USA) and Statistica 12 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA). We conducted analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with dose as a factor, followed by Tukey post hoc tests. Fisher's exact tests were used to compare proportions. To assess order effects of the substance administration, order (psilocybin-first vs. psilocybin-second) was incorporated as an additional factor in the ANOVAs. Differences in kidney and liver function and blood cell counts between the screening and end-of-study visit measures were analyzed using paired t-tests. The level of significance was set to p < 0.05.
ACUTE SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF PSILOCYBIN
Characteristics of the study participants are shown in Table. Positive subjective effects. All doses from 15 to 30 mg psilocybin increased "any drug effect" and "good drug effect" on the VAS and OB ratings on the 5D-ASC compared with placebo (Table). The 20, 25, and 30 mg doses induced greater increases in "any drug J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f effects" and "good drug effects" compared with the lower 15 mg dose (Table). Ratings of subjective "good drug effects" that were higher than 50% of the scale maximum occurred in 79%, 91%, 88%, and 96% of the participants at the 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg doses of psilocybin, respectively. Mean ratings of OB were 24%, 31%, 41%, and 37% with 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg psilocybin, respectively. Ratings of OB that were higher than 50% of the scale maximum occurred in 14%, 27%, 42%, and 25% of the participants at the 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg doses of psilocybin, respectively. Negative subjective effects. "Bad drug effects" on the VAS and AED ratings on the 5D-ASC increased with all doses from 15 to 30 mg compared with placebo (Table). Subjective "bad drug effects" with a rating higher than 50% of the scale maximum were reported by 14%, 18%, 42%, and 32% of the participants at the 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg doses, respectively (Table). Ratings of "anxiety" on the VAS moderately increased at the 25 and 30 mg doses but not at 15 or 20 mg dose compared with placebo (Table). Ratings of "anxiety" that were higher than 50% of the scale maximum were reached in 7%, 6%, 17%, and 11% of the participants at the 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg doses, respectively (Table). Mean AED ratings were 9%, 10%, 25%, and 17% at the 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg doses, respectively. Ratings of AED that were higher than 50% of the scale maximum occurred in 4%, 0%, 13%, and 7% of the participants at the 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg doses of psilocybin, respectively (Table). Mean ratings of "ego dissolution" on the VAS increased dose-dependently with higher doses (Table). Ratings of more than 50% of the scale maximum for the VAS "ego dissolution" were reached in 46%, 67%, 75%, and 89% of the participants at 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg psilocybin, respectively (Table). Effect onset and time to maximal effect of the subjective "any drug effect" (mean ± SD) were 0.6 ± 0.4 h and 2.1 ± 0.8 h for all doses, respectively. The effect duration was 5.5 ± 2.1 h for all doses. Respective values for each dose are shown in Table. Values did not differ relevantly across the dose range tested. Subjective effects of psilocybin did not differ if psilocybin was administered first or after another treatment. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
ACUTE EFFECTS OF PSILOCYBIN ON VITAL SIGNS
Psilocybin produced significant acute and transient increases in blood pressure and body temperature. Clear dose dependence was not observed. Systolic blood pressure values > 140, > 160, and > 180 mmHg were observed in 50%, 6%, and 0% of all psilocybin administrations, respectively (Table). No severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg) was observed. Maximal diastolic and systolic blood pressure values among the 113 psilocybin administrations were 115 and 180 mmHg, respectively. A peak heart rate > 100 beats/min was reached in 7%, 3%, 4%, and 11% of the administrations of 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg psilocybin, respectively. Over all 113 psilocybin administrations, tachycardia (< 100 beats/min) was observed in 7%. The highest heart rate of any participant was 140 beats/min. Body temperature increased dose-dependently with values > 38°C reached in 7%, 9%, 17%, and 32% of administrations of 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg psilocybin. Overall, psilocybin increased body temperature to > 38°C in 16% of all psilocybin administrations. The highest body temperature was 39.0°C. No hyperpyrexia (> 40°C) occurred (Table). Vital sign changes did not differ if psilocybin was administered first or after another treatment. Over all participants in Study 1, psilocybin did not increase the QTc time 2.5 h after administration compared with the QTc time that was measured 1 h prior. The longest QTc interval that was observed in any participant was 481 ms 2.5 h after psilocybin administration.
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF PSILOCYBIN
Psilocybin produced significant acute and subacute adverse effects on the List of Complaints compared with placebo (Table). Adverse effects were comparable at the 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg doses and greater than with placebo (Table). Specific acute and subacute complaints are listed in Table. The most frequent acute adverse effects included fatigue, lack of concentration, headache, lethargy, vertigo, feeling of physical or emotional J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f weakness, decreased appetite, nausea, feeling dull, and being easily exhausted (Table). The most frequent subacute adverse effects included tiredness, headache, lack of energy, neck pain, and feeling dull (Table). Acute anxiety on the List of Complaints was reported by 7%, 6%, 38%, and 21% of the participants at 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg psilocybin, respectively, and in one participant after placebo administration (Table). The number of adverse effects was unchanged if psilocybin was administered first or after another treatment. Five participants (6%) reported flashbacks after psilocybin. In four of the participants, flashbacks reportedly occurred once 30 ± 29 h (mean ± SD; range: 10-72 h) after psilocybin administration. One participant reported reoccurring visual flashbacks that were not disruptive or frightening but were occurring over several months. Flashbacks of Study 1 and Study 2 are also described in detail elsewhere. No serious adverse reactions occurred. Additional possibly treatment-related adverse events that were spontaneously reported within the first 48 h after discharge from the study visits included headache (10% after psilocybin, 7% after placebo), depressive mood (4% after psilocybin, 0% after placebo), nausea (3% after psilocybin, 0% after placebo), restlessness (2% after psilocybin, 0% after placebo), insomnia/nightmares (2% after psilocybin, 0% after placebo), circulatory collapse (1% after psilocybin, 0% after placebo), paranoid thoughts (1% after psilocybin, 0% after placebo), tendency to cry (1% after psilocybin, 0% after placebo), nosebleed (1% after psilocybin, 0% after placebo), and muscle twitches (1% after psilocybin, 0% after placebo).
PLASMA PSILOCIN CONCENTRATIONS
Peak plasma psilocin (active metabolite of psilocybin) concentrations and areas under the plasma concentration curve for all dose groups are shown in Table. The full pharmacokinetics of psilocybin of the studies are reported in detail elsewhere. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
EFFECTS OF PSILOCYBIN ON KIDNEY AND LIVER FUNCTION AND CHANGES IN BLOOD CELL COUNTS
At the end of the study, 28 ± 18 days (mean ± SD) after the last substance administration, plasma creatinine levels and the estimated glomerular filtration rate were unchanged compared with the start of the study (Table). Similarly, plasma levels of alanine aminotransferase and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase were similar at the screening visit and endof-study visit. Hemoglobin levels decreased during the study because of the blood sampling. Red and white blood cell counts remained unchanged.
PARTICIPANTS' INTEREST IN USING PSILOCYBIN AGAIN
Seventy-two percent of the participants were psilocybin-naive at the start of the study, and the other 28% had limited experience with psilocybin (i.e., maximum ≤ 5 exposures). Eighty-five participants were asked at the end of the study whether they would consider taking psilocybin again. Two participants (2%) reported that they would probably not take psilocybin again under any circumstances. Seventy participants (82%) reported that they would consider taking psilocybin again. Thirteen participants (15%) reported that they might consider taking psilocybin again. Thirty-eight participants (45%) would only take psilocybin in another clinical study or safe environment. Fifty-two participants (61%) indicated that they would take psilocybin together with friends in a recreational setting. Twenty-six participants (31%) indicated that they would take psilocybin in nature rather than in a hospital setting. Seventy-four participants (87%; 34 women, 41 men) reported a positive overall psilocybin experience, nine participants (11%; seven women, one man) reported a neutral experience, and two participants (2%; one woman and one man) reported a disappointing or bad experience. Forty-two participants (49%) reported that a past drug experience with a psychedelic compound had an influence on their experience during the study, whereas 24 participants (28%) reported that their earlier experiences did not have an impact.
DISCUSSION
The present study analyzed pooled data from three randomized controlled Phase 1 studies of psilocybin and characterized acute subjective, autonomic, and adverse effects of different doses in healthy participants. In contrast to the primary reports of each study, the present pooled analysis focused on reporting proportions of participants who exhibited extreme values rather than population means. Overall, positive subjective effects, including "good drug effect" and OB, were reached already at the lower doses and to a higher extent than negative subjective drug effects, including "bad drug effect," "anxiety," and AED. These data may help identify a therapeutic dose to be used in psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy that induces strong and primarily positive acute effects and no or only minimal negative subjective effects. Several clinical studies have shown that a positive acute psychedelic experience predicted long-term therapeutic outcomes in patients with depression, anxiety, or tobacco dependenceand long-term positive mood effects in healthy participants. Therefore, inducing mostly positive effects is desirable, although challenging experiences may also have therapeutic potential. The 20, 25, and 30 mg doses of psilocybin appear to be comparable when considering the magnitude of their positive subjective effects and stronger than the 15 mg dose. All four doses induced greater negative subjective effects ("bad drug effect") compared with placebo, but significant "anxiety" occurred only with the 25 and 30 mg doses. The subjective "bad drug effect" was not defined exclusively as a psychological effect but could also mean that the participants were feeling physical discomfort, such as nausea or headache. "Oceanic Boundlessness" and AED ratings were comparable over all doses of psilocybin. "Ego dissolution" assessed over time increased with the dose and exhibited a stronger association with "good drug effect" than with "bad drug effect", suggesting a rather positive than negative valence.
J O U R N A L P R E -P R O O F
The average onset time, time to peak effect, and effect duration (mean ± SD) over all doses of psilocybin were 0.6 ± 0.4 h, 2.1 ± 0.8 h, and 5.5 ± 2.1 h, respectively. Previously, the onset time of psilocybin was reported to be 20-40 min, and the duration was reported to be shorter than 6 h, which was confirmed by our analysis. However, the time to peak effects in the present analysis was 2 h and longer than the previously reported 60-90 min. With regard to cardiovascular risks, psilocybin induced mild sympathomimetic activation in most participants. Tachycardia (> 100 beats/min) was observed in 7% of psilocybin administrations, and hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg) was observed in 50% of psilocybin administrations. Tachycardia occurred in 3% and 20% of the participants, and hypertension occurred in 52% and 53% after the administration of equivalent doses of 20 mg psilocybin and 0.1 mg LSD, respectively. In contrast, MDMA, which is also used in substance-assisted therapy, induced tachycardia in 33% of the participants and hypertension in 90% of the participants in a similar analysis of pooled studies. Thus, MDMA produces overall clearly greater cardiovascular stimulation than the psychedelics psilocybin and LSD at commonly used doses. Psilocybin may thus be an alternative to MDMA in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. The data confirmed the overall comparable cardiovascular stimulation of psilocybin and LSD at equivalent psychoactive doses. In another previous study, psilocybin also produced comparable sympathomimetic activation at doses of 10, 20, and 30 mg/70 kg body weightas reported in the present study. The present analysis also showed that psilocybin increased body temperature dose-dependently. Psilocybin increased body temperature to > 38°C in 16% of all psilocybin administrations and comparably to LSD. Only in one participant did body temperature increase above 38.8°C (to 39.0°C), which was presumably because of a beginning COVID-19 infection. No hyperpyrexia (< 40°C) occurred. We did not find significant QTc interval J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f prolongation during the peak response to psilocybin compared with the QTc interval before psilocybin administration in Study 1. Acute negative psychological effects are considered the main risk of psychedelic substance use in humans. However, psilocybin also induces physical discomfort. Frequent acute adverse events were general exhaustion, including fatigue, lack of concentration, lethargy, vertigo, feeling of weakness, and decreased appetite. The reported subacute adverse effects up to 24 h suggest a state of "exhaustion" akin to fatigue that is experienced after intense mental or physical activity. In contrast, between-session adverse events were equally frequent after psilocybin and placebo administration, indicating no prolonged after-effects of psilocybin beyond 24 h. Notably, adverse effects, such as fatigue and headache, could also be seen in participants after placebo administration, so lying in a hospital bed for most of the day and not being able to consume caffeine could have exacerbated these symptoms. Headache and nausea are two adverse events that have been typically described in other clinical studies after psilocybin administration. In the present analysis, headache up to 12 h after psilocybin administration occurred in 55% of the participants and up to 24 h in 42% of the participants. Nausea up to 12 h after administration occurred in 39% of the participations and up to 24 h in 4% of the participations. There was no clear dose dependence for headache or nausea. Anxiety on the List of Complaints was indicated by 38% of the participants who ingested the 25 mg psilocybin. During the study sessions, anxiety could be reduced by verbal support in all participants, and benzodiazepines were not used. No cases of severe anxiety, panic attacks, or acute suicidality occurred. Overall acute adverse effects were quite common and mostly not dose-dependent within the 15-30 mg dose range. Adverse effects of psilocybin were transient and not sufficiently disabling or severe to require medical intervention. As subacute adverse events, flashbacks and hallucinogen persisting perception disorder have been previously described following the use of psychedelics. However, the frequency and J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f nature of flashbacks and risk factors are still unidentified. A pooled analysis of several studies was published in 2022, which also included Studies 1 and 2 in the present pooled analysis. Together with the present analysis, the findings indicate that even in controlled studies, flashbacks are possible but mostly transient and not frightening. One participant reported reoccurring visual flashbacks after psilocybin and LSD administration, which were not disruptive or frightening but were occurring over several months as already described previously. Hallucinogen persisting perception disorderwas not observed in the present pooled analysis. Similar to the present analysis, flashbacks were reported by 7% of the participants within 24-86 h after LSD administration. In the present study, psilocybin did not influence average levels of liver enzymes 1 month after psilocybin administration. An expected decrease in hemoglobin levels was observed at the end-of-study visit. These findings were attributable to the overall blood loss of 250-800 ml through blood sampling during the test sessions as observed previously in similar studiesor after blood donation. Retrospectively, 87% of the participants in the present analysis reported an overall positive subjective experience, whereas only 2% reported a disappointing or bad psilocybin experience. The results of this study indicate that psilocybin appears to be safe in a controlled setting with transient adverse effects. The safety data can partially be applied to the use of psilocybin in patients. The study participants typically had no or very little previous psilocybin experience, similar to most patients. Furthermore, psilocybin-assisted therapy is typically used sporadically 2-3 times and spaced several weeks apart in addition to conventional non-substance-assisted psychotherapy. Consistent with the present data, there are no reports of acute serious adverse reactions to psilocybin or other serotonergic psychedelics in modern clinical studies. However, these data were collected from mostly young and physically and psychiatrically healthy people. The results may also differ in patients with J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f psychiatric or cardiovascular disorders. The present study has several strengths. We used data from three randomized controlled trials that were conducted within the same highly controlled laboratory setting. All studies included similar numbers of male and female participants and used psilocybin capsules from the same batch that was well-characterized pharmaceutically with a known exact drug content. The doses in this pooled analysis were in the typical range that is used in clinical research with psilocybin in patients. Additionally, the doses of psilocybin were well defined. Drug dose is the most important known predictor of the psilocybin experience. The present study also has limitations. We pooled three studies that included different people. Only the 15 and 30 mg doses in Study 2 were administered in the same participants. Study 1 that included the 25 mg dose was not a placebo-controlled study, and measures were only assessed up to 7 h after psilocybin administration. In Studies 2 and 3, participants also ingested other substances (LSD and mescaline), which might have partially affected the psilocybin experience or changed expectations when administered before psilocybin. However, no significant main effect of order of the substance sessions was detected, and there was no interaction with dose when order was incorporated as an additional factor in the ANOVAs. Additionally, previous substance use has not been shown to affect the acute subjective effects in a previous smaller study including partly the same data. Another important caveat poses that although the unpleasant effects in our study were modest and transient, we only included psychiatrically healthy participants. Therefore, the risks of psilocybin use might be different in a more heterogeneous population and in patients in a therapeutic setting and need to be further investigated. Moreover, the participants were mostly young and physically healthy, but older patients or patients with cardiovascular risk factors may also be treated with psilocybin. Furthermore, we included 85 participants who received psilocybin a total of 113 times. This sample size is too small to detect infrequent (0.1-1%) or rare (< 0.1%) adverse events.
J O U R N A L P R E -P R O O F
Additionally, there was no long-term follow-up. Although doses of psilocybin were well defined, individual differences in the bioavailability or metabolism of psilocybin were not included in this study. In this analysis we have outlined acute safety concerns related to psilocybin administration but have not examined potential risk factors for adverse events. Previous analyses indicated that "emotional excitability" prior to drug intake predicts unpleasant or anxious reactions to psilocybin, whereas factors such as drug use, sex, and body weight do not relevantly alter acute effects or safety of psilocybin.
CONCLUSION
Single-dose administrations of psilocybin up to 30 mg were safe with regard to acute psychological and physical harm in healthy participants in a controlled clinical setting. Psilocybin induced mild cardiovascular stimulation. Acute subjective effects were predominantly positive, but transient anxiety and "bad drug effects" occurred. These safety data do not raise any concerns about single-dose, infrequent psilocybin administration in a controlled clinical setting. However, risks and benefits of using psilocybin in patients need further study.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Populationhumans
- Characteristicsmeta analysis
- Journal
- Compound