Safety pharmacology of acute psilocybin administration in healthy participants
This pooled analysis (n=85; doses=113) of three randomised crossover studies evaluates the safety pharmacology of psilocybin (15-30mg). Psilocybin induced stronger effects at higher doses, with 25 mg and 30 mg doses showing increased anxiety. However, overall, psilocybin was found to be safe in terms of acute psychological and physical harm, with no serious adverse reactions reported, suggesting its potential safety for controlled research settings.
Authors
- Matthias Liechti
- Friederike Holze
- Lukas Ley
Published
Abstract
Psilocybin is being studied for its therapeutic potential in various mental health disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and addiction. Initial studies suggested that psilocybin is generally safe when used under controlled conditions, but more research is needed to better understand its safety profile. We report safety pharmacology data from a pooled analysis of three randomized crossover studies that included 85 healthy participants and 113 single-dose administrations of psilocybin. Single oral doses included 15 mg, 20 mg, 25 mg, and 30 mg psilocybin dihydrate. We investigated subjective effects, blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, acute and subacute adverse effects, reports of flashbacks, and liver and kidney function before and after the studies. The 20, 25, and 30 mg doses of psilocybin produced stronger effects than the 15 mg dose. Psilocybin at all doses induced higher “good drug effects” than “bad drug effects.” Only the 25 and 30 mg doses increased anxiety. Psilocybin elevated autonomic effects only moderately. Tachycardia (>100 beats/min) was observed with 7% of all psilocybin administrations. Body temperature >38° was reached in 7%, 9%, 17%, and 32% of the participants with the 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg doses, respectively. Kidney and liver function parameters were unaltered at the end of the study. Five participants (6%) reported transient flashback phenomena. No serious adverse reactions occurred. These findings suggest that a single administration of psilocybin is safe with regard to acute psychological and physical harm in healthy participants in a controlled research setting.
Research Summary of 'Safety pharmacology of acute psilocybin administration in healthy participants'
Introduction
Classic psychedelic psilocybin is under investigation for multiple clinical indications including depression, anxiety, addiction and certain headache disorders. Earlier controlled trials have generally reported tolerable and transient adverse effects, but uncertainties remain about the detailed safety pharmacology profile—particularly the incidence of challenging psychological reactions ("bad trips"), acute anxiety, flashbacks or hallucinogen persisting perception disorder (HPPD), and cardiovascular and thermoregulatory effects. The authors note that many patient studies lack frequent, standardised vital-sign monitoring, creating a need for more granular safety data collected under highly controlled conditions. Straumann and colleagues therefore performed a pooled analysis of three Phase I, randomised crossover trials conducted in the same laboratory to describe the acute subjective, autonomic and adverse-effect profile, and to examine kidney and liver function before and after study participation. The pooled dataset spans a representative clinical dose range (15–30 mg single oral doses of psilocybin dihydrate) in psychiatrically and physically screened healthy adults with no or minimal prior psychedelic use, with the goal of informing safety considerations for single-dose, infrequent psilocybin administration in a clinical research setting.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Straumann, I., Holze, F., Becker, A. M., Ley, L., Halter, N., & Liechti, M. E. (2024). Safety pharmacology of acute psilocybin administration in healthy participants. Neuroscience Applied, 3, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104060
References (31)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Andersen, K. A. A., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Nutt, D. J. et al. · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (2020)
Barrett, F. S., Bradstreet, M. P., Leoutsakos, J. M. S. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Breeksema, J. J., Kuin, B. W., Kamphuis, J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Carbonaro, T. M., Bradstreet, M. P., Barrett, F. S. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Carbonaro, T. M., Hurwitz, E., Johnson, M. W. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, M., Rucker, J. et al. · Lancet Psychiatry (2016)
Garcia-Romeu, A., Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W. · Current Drug Abuse Reviews (2015)
Gashi, L., Sandberg, S., Pedersen, W. · International Journal of Drug Policy (2021)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2011)
Show all 31 referencesShow fewer
Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., Mccann, U. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2006)
Hasler, F., Grimberg, U., Benz, M. A. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2004)
Holze, F., Becker, A. M., Kolaczynska, K. E. et al. · Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (2022)
Holze, F., Caluori, T. V., Vizeli, P. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2021)
Holze, F., Gasser, P., Müller, F. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2023)
Holze, F., Ley, L., Müller, F. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2022)
Holze, F., Vizeli, P., Ley, L. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2020)
´dric, C., Hysek, M., Schmid, Y. et al. · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (2013)
Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2008)
Johnson, M. W., Sewell, R. A., Griffiths, R. R. · Drug and Alcohol Dependence (2012)
Ley, L., Holze, F., Arikci, D. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2023)
Martinotti, G., Santacroce, R., Pettorruso, M. et al. · Brain Sciences (2018)
McCulloch, D. E-W., Madsen, M. K., Jensen, P. S. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2022)
Müller, F., Holze, F., Becker, A. M. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2022)
Raison, C. L., Sanacora, G., Woolley, J. D. et al. · JAMA (2023)
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Schmid, Y., Gasser, P., Oehen, P. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2020)
Schmid, Y., Liechti, M. E. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Kometer, M. et al. · PLOS ONE (2012)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Vollenweider, F. X. · PLOS ONE (2010)
Vizeli, P., Liechti, M. E. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
Cited By (5)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Erne, L., Mueller, L., Straumann, I. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2026)
Cheng, M., Aboulafia-Brakha, T., Buchard, A. et al. · Psychology International (2025)
Becker, A. M., Humbert-Droz, M., Mueller, L. et al. · Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (2025)
Mueller, F., Hawrot, T., Schmid, Y. · Neuroscience Applied (2025)
Klaiber, A., Humbert‐Droz, M., Ley, L. et al. · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (2024)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.