Taking Psychedelics Seriously
This paper (2018) reviews the history of psychedelics as a therapeutic agent and suggests that it is time to revisit this class of drugs as a possible option to alleviate suffering.
Abstract
Background
Psychiatric research in the 1950s and 1960s showed potential for psychedelic medications to markedly alleviate depression and suffering associated with terminal illness. More recent published studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of psilocybin, MDMA, and ketamine when administered in a medically supervised and monitored approach. A single or brief series of sessions often results in substantial and sustained improvement among people with treatment-resistant depression and anxiety, including those with serious medical conditions.Need and Clinical Considerations: Palliative care clinicians occasionally encounter patients with emotional, existential, or spiritual suffering, which persists despite optimal existing treatments. Such suffering may rob people of a sense that life is worth living. Data from Oregon show that most terminally people who obtain prescriptions to intentionally end their lives are motivated by non-physical suffering. This paper overviews the history of this class of drugs and their therapeutic potential. Clinical cautions, adverse reactions, and important steps related to safe administration of psychedelics are presented, emphasizing careful patient screening, preparation, setting and supervision.
Conclusion
Even with an expanding evidence base confirming safety and benefits, political, regulatory, and industry issues impose challenges to the legitimate use of psychedelics. The federal expanded access program and right-to-try laws in multiple states provide precendents for giving terminally ill patients access to medications that have not yet earned FDA approval. Given the prevalence of persistent suffering and growing acceptance of physician-hastened death as a medical response, it is time to revisit the legitimate therapeutic use of psychedelics.
Research Summary of 'Taking Psychedelics Seriously'
Introduction
Recent high-profile articles and peer-reviewed studies have renewed interest in psychedelic drugs for psychiatric use, particularly for severe depression, demoralisation in terminal illness, and PTSD. Earlier mid-twentieth century clinical work suggested these agents could markedly reduce existential distress in people with cancer, but political backlash and Schedule I classification curtailed research for decades. More recent, carefully controlled trials and small clinical series have reported promising safety and efficacy when psychedelics are administered with psychotherapy, close medical supervision, and attention to ‘‘set and setting’’. At the same time, clinicians are urged to remain sceptical because these substances carry real acute risks and remain illegal at the federal level in the United States. Byock sets out to provide an overview of the history, therapeutic potential, clinical cautions, and regulatory and business considerations surrounding clinical use of psychedelics. The paper aims to inform palliative care clinicians about situations in which persistent emotional, existential, or spiritual suffering may justify reconsidering these treatments, and to argue for renewed, cautious research and access pathways for seriously ill patients when standard approaches fail.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Topics
- APA Citation
Byock, I. (2018). Taking Psychedelics Seriously. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 21(4), 417-421. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2017.0684
References (6)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Neurotherapeutics (2017)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L., Bolstridge, M. et al. · Scientific Reports (2017)
Grob, C. S., Mithoefer, M. C., Brewerton, T. D. · Lancet Psychiatry (2016)
Sessa, B. · Neuroscience Letters (2016)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Erritzoe, D., Haijen, E. C. H. M. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Wagner, M. T., Mithoefer, M. C., Mithoefer, A. T. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
Cited By (15)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Barta, S., Brooker, J., O’Callaghan, C. · Journal of Palliative Medicine (2025)
Marrocu, A., Kettner, H., Weiss, B. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2024)
Wall, M. B., Harding, R., Zafar, R. et al. · Molecular Psychiatry (2023)
Stoliker, D., Egan, G. F., Friston, K. J. et al. · Pharmacological Reviews (2022)
Hipólito, I., Mago, J., Rosas, F. E. et al. · Psyarxiv (2022)
Niles, H., Fogg, C., Kelmendi, B. et al. · BMC Palliative Care (2021)
Kuc, J., Kettner, H., Rosas, F. E. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2021)
Nichols, C. D., Wiatr, K., Figiel, M. et al. · Journal of Neurochemistry (2021)
Beaussant, Y., Tulsky, J., Guérin, B. et al. · Journal of Palliative Medicine (2021)
Kaertner, L. S., Steinborn, M. B., Kettner, H. et al. · Scientific Reports (2021)
Show all 15 papersShow fewer
Ortiz, M. I., Gómez-Busto, F. J. · Clinical Neuropsychiatry (2020)
Morgan, L. · Annals of General Psychiatry (2020)
Greif, A., Šurkala, M. · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy (2020)
Castellanos, J. P., Woolley, C., Bruno, K. A. et al. · Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (2020)
Bahji, A., Forsyth, A., Groll, D. et al. · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (2020)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.