Three Decades of Research on the Development of Ibogaine Treatment of Substance Use Disorders: A Scientometric Analysis
This review (2023) examines the interest in ibogaine's therapeutic potential for substance use disorders over three decades (1993-2022). The study identifies a linear growth of publications in the first and third decades, with academic research centers in the United States and Canada being the most productive. Major keywords shifted from cocaine, tobacco, morphine, and alcohol in the first two decades to opioids and psychedelics in the third decade, indicating evolving research trends.
Authors
- Fernandes-Nascimento, M. H.
- Negrão, A. B.
- Viana-Ferreira, K.
Published
Abstract
Ibogaine is a natural psychoactive drug that has been investigated for its potential role in the treatment of substance use disorders since the mid-1960s. To evaluate the interest in ibogaine’s use as a therapeutic agent, we performed a scientometric analysis covering the last three decades (1993-2002, 2003-2012, and 2013-2022). A complementary analysis was performed to select and describe published clinical trials and meta-analyses. A total of 1523 references were found. Linear growth of publications in the first and third decades were identified, and the average number of publications from 1993 to 2002 was lower than that in the other two decades. Researchers from five continents were identified. Globally, academic research centers in the United States and Canada were the most productive. Cocaine, tobacco, morphine, and alcohol prevailed as major keywords in the first two decades and opioids and psychedelics were included in the third decade. A few key authors were the most co-referenced. One preclinical meta-analysis and no meta-analysis in humans were found. Research trends for ibogaine are widespread, growing, and consonant with current attentiveness in drug abuse. Our findings support the pressing need for rigorous clinical research on ibogaine to evaluate its efficacy and safety.
Research Summary of 'Three Decades of Research on the Development of Ibogaine Treatment of Substance Use Disorders: A Scientometric Analysis'
Introduction
Worldwide burden from substance use disorders (SUDs) remains substantial: earlier estimates cited in the paper put global users at 5.5% of the population and around 271 million people with SUDs, with cocaine, tobacco, heroin, alcohol and other opioids among the most common substances. Existing pharmacotherapies do not fully address morbidity, mortality and economic costs, prompting interest in alternative or adjunctive approaches. Ibogaine, an indole alkaloid derived from African plants, was identified in the mid-1960s as having anti‑addictive properties and has been investigated for opioid and stimulant addiction; a synthetic congener, 18‑methoxycoronaridine (18‑MC), has been evaluated in animal work. Safety concerns—most notably toxicity, hallucinogenic effects, risk of cardiac arrhythmias and reported fatalities—have limited clinical development and sustained debate about therapeutic use. Fernandes‑Nascimento and colleagues set out to map the scientific literature on ibogaine for SUD treatment over the last three decades (1993–2022) using a scientometric approach. The stated aim was to quantify publication trends, identify influential authors, organisations and countries, and characterise topical shifts (for example, keywords) across three ten‑year periods. A complementary screening was performed to select and describe any human randomised clinical trials and systematic reviews with meta‑analyses indexed in SCOPUS.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- APA Citation
Fernandes-Nascimento, M. H., Negrão, A. B., Viana-Ferreira, K., Chaves, B. D. R., & Wang, Y. (2024). Three Decades of Research on the Development of Ibogaine Treatment of Substance Use Disorders: A Scientometric Analysis. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 56(5), 670-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2023.2276230
References (8)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Breeksema, J. J., Niemeijer, A. R., Krediet, E. et al. · CNS Drugs (2020)
Cameron, L. P., Tombari, R. J., Lu, J. et al. · Nature (2020)
Cappendijk, S. L. T., Dzoljic, M. R. · European Journal of Pharmacology (1993)
Ly, C., Greb, A. C., Cameron, L. P. et al. · Cell Reports (2018)
Mash, D. C., Ameer, B., Prou, D. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Logrip, M. L., Mash, D. C., Duque, L. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Frampton, C. M., Yazar-Klosinski, B., Nollar, G. E. · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (2017)
Pilecki, B., Luoma, J. B., Bathje, G. J. et al. · Harm Reduction Journal (2021)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.