Updated cost-effectiveness of MDMA-assisted therapy for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in the United States: Findings from a phase 3 trial
Using phase 3 trial data and a Markov model, MDMA-assisted therapy for severe or extreme chronic PTSD costs US$11,537 per patient and is cost-saving from a US payer perspective—producing discounted net health‑care savings of US$132.9 million per 1,000 patients, accruing 4,856 QALYs and averting 61.4 premature deaths over 30 years with a 3.8‑year payback. The more intensive three‑session phase 3 regimen yields greater medical savings and health benefits than shorter two‑session regimens.
Abstract
Background
Severe posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent and debilitating condition in the United States. and globally. Using pooled efficacy data from six phase 2 trials, therapy using 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) appeared cost-saving from a payer’s perspective. This study updates the cost-effectiveness analysis of this novel therapy using data from a new phase 3 trial, including the incremental cost-effectiveness of the more intensive phase 3 regimen compared with the shorter phase 2 regimen.
Methods
We adapted a previously-published Markov model to portray the costs and health benefits of providing MDMA-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT) to patients with chronic, severe, or extreme PTSD in a recent phase 3 trial, compared with standard care. Inputs were based on trial results and published literature. The trial treated 90 patients with a clinician administered PTSD scale (CAPS-5) total severity score of 35 or greater at baseline, and duration of PTSD symptoms of 6 months or longer. The primary outcome was assessed 8 weeks after the final experimental session. Patients received three 90-minute preparatory psychotherapy sessions, three 8-hour active MDMA or placebo sessions, and nine 90-minute integrative psychotherapy sessions. Our model calculates the per-patient cost of MDMA-AT, net all-cause medical costs, mortality, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We reported results from the U.S. health care payer’s perspective for multiple analytic time horizons, (base-case is 30 years), and conducted extensive sensitivity analyses. Costs and QALYs were discounted by 3% annually. Costs were adjusted to 2020 U.S. dollars according to the medical component of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index (CPI).
Results
MDMA-AT as conducted in the phase 3 trial costs $11,537 per patient. Compared to standard of care for 1,000 patients, MDMA-AT generates discounted net health care savings of $132.9 million over 30 years, accruing 4,856 QALYs, and averting 61.4 premature deaths. MDMA-AT breaks even on cost at 3.8 years while delivering 887 QALYs. A third MDMA session generates additional medical savings and health benefits compared with a two-session regimen. Hypothetically assuming no savings in health care costs, MDMA-AT has an ICER of $2,384 per QALY gained.
Conclusions
MDMA-AT provided to patients with severe or extreme chronic PTSD is cost-saving from a payer’s perspective, while delivering substantial clinical benefit.
Research Summary of 'Updated cost-effectiveness of MDMA-assisted therapy for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in the United States: Findings from a phase 3 trial'
Introduction
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common and often chronic in the United States, producing substantial human suffering and higher rates of comorbid illness, reduced productivity and increased health care use. Earlier randomized Phase II trials of MDMA-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT), pooled across six studies, suggested large clinical benefits and an earlier cost-effectiveness analysis using those pooled data indicated the intervention could be cost-saving to third-party payers over a 30-year horizon. Despite promising Phase II results, important uncertainties remained about the magnitude and durability of benefit using the more intensive Phase III regimen and about the economic consequences when newer trial data are employed. This study updates a previously published decision-analytic Markov model using individual patient-level and trial-derived inputs from a MAPS-sponsored Phase III randomised, placebo-controlled, multi-site trial of MDMA-AT. Marseille and colleagues set out to estimate per-patient intervention costs, net medical costs to a US health care payer, mortality effects, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness, comparing the Phase III three-session MDMA-AT protocol with standard care and, in scenario analysis, with the less intensive two-session Phase II regimen. A 30-year analytic horizon with 3% discounting is the base case, and extensive sensitivity and scenario analyses explore key uncertainties such as durability of effect and treatment intensity.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Author
- APA Citation
Marseille, E., Mitchell, J. M., & Kahn, J. G. (2022). Updated cost-effectiveness of MDMA-assisted therapy for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in the United States: Findings from a phase 3 trial. PLOS ONE, 17(2), e0263252. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263252
References (5)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Marseille, E., Kahn, J. G., Yazar-Klosinski, B. et al. · PLOS ONE (2020)
Mitchell, J., Bogenschutz, M. P., Lilienstein, A. et al. · Nature Medicine (2021)
Mithoefer, M. C., Wagner, M. T., Mithoefer, A. T. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2012)
Mithoefer, M. C., Feduccia, A. A., Jerome, L. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2019)
Oehen, P., Traber, R., Widmer, V. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2012)
Cited By (6)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Jacobs, E., Zahid, Z., Hinkle, J. et al. · BMJ (2026)
Marseille, E., Chernoloz, O., Orlov, |. O. · World Medical & Health Policy (2025)
Stanghellini, G. · PLOS ONE (2024)
Marseille, E., Stauffer, C., Agrawal, M. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2023)
Rodgers, A., Bahceci, D., Davey, C. G. et al. · Australian and new-zealand Journal of Psychiatry (2023)
Heifets, B. D., Olson, D. E. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2023)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.