Psychedelic trials are unusually hard to run. Sessions last hours, sites need adapted rooms and specially trained staff, blinding is compromised by the drug’s obvious effects, and recruitment draws from populations mainstream psychiatry often fails. The organisations here supply the machinery: CROs (contract research organisations) that run trials, site networks that host them, recruitment platforms, and specialist services from rater training to session monitoring.
This category carries our deepest comparison tooling: a capability matrix mapping who does what across the trial lifecycle, and a market map showing where the infrastructure physically sits. The question map is simple: who can run, host, staff, or fill a psychedelic trial, and what evidence backs their claim to experience.