Real-World Data & Evidence Collection
Organisations building registries, outcome platforms, and data infrastructure to capture real-world evidence on psychedelic therapies.
Clinical trials answer whether a treatment can work under controlled conditions. What happens once psychedelics are used in the real world (in Oregon service centres, Australian clinics, or ceremonial settings) is a different evidence problem, and these are the organisations building the registries, outcome platforms, and safety-monitoring systems to answer it.
The organisations here differ on the questions that matter to a researcher or sponsor: what kind of data they hold (registry data, patient self-report, safety surveillance), whether you can access it, how current it is, and how their methods hold up. The profiles record each of these, with verification and freshness signals shown directly on the cards.
- Organisations
- 31
- Countries
- 1
Specific Groups
By country
Registry and data source comparison
| Organisation | Data Type | Access Model | Update Cadence |
|---|---|---|---|
| America's Poison Centers | Safety surveillance data | Case-by-case access | Real-time / continuous |
| Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry | Registry data | Open access | Daily |
| Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry | Registry data | Open access | Daily |
| CTIS (Clinical Trials Information System) | Registry data | Open access | Daily |
| Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) | Registry data | Open access | Daily |
| Clarivate Cortellis | Mixed evidence | Paid / licensed access | Monthly |
| ClinicalTrials.gov | Registry data | Open access | Daily |
| EMA EudraVigilance | Safety surveillance data | Open access | Weekly |
| Erowid Center | Patient self-report data | Open access | Ad-hoc / irregular |
| EudraCT (EU Clinical Trials Register, legacy) | Registry data | Open access | Ad-hoc / irregular |
| FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS) | Safety surveillance data | Open access | Weekly |
| FDA MedWatch | Safety surveillance data | Open access | Weekly |
| German Clinical Trials Register | Registry data | Open access | Daily |
| Global Drug Survey | Patient self-report data | Registration required | Ad-hoc / irregular |
| HMA-EMA Catalogues of Real-World Data Sources and Studies | Mixed evidence | Open access | Weekly |
| Health Canada Canada Vigilance | Safety surveillance data | Open access | Weekly |
| IQVIA Real World Data | Mixed evidence | Paid / licensed access | Monthly |
| ISRCTN Registry | Registry data | Open access | Daily |
| MHRA Yellow Card | Safety surveillance data | Open access | Weekly |
| Medsafe & CARM Pharmacovigilance | Safety surveillance data | Open access | Weekly |
| Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb | Safety surveillance data | Open access | Weekly |
| PatientsLikeMe | Patient self-report data | Registration required | Daily |
| Quantified Citizen | Patient self-report data | Registration required | Ad-hoc / irregular |
| Rocky Mountain Poison & Drug Safety | Safety surveillance data | Case-by-case access | Daily |
| Singapore HSA Adverse Event Reporting | Safety surveillance data | Open access | Weekly |
| Swissmedic ElViS | Safety surveillance data | Registration required | Weekly |
| TGA DAEN | Safety surveillance data | Open access | Weekly |
| Uppsala Monitoring Centre | Safety surveillance data | Case-by-case access | Daily |
| WHO ICTRP | Registry data | Open access | Weekly |
Showing the first 40 organisations with profile data; use the filters below to narrow the full list.
All Organisations
America's Poison Centers
US network of poison centers and national data system (NPDS) for toxicology and pharmacovigilance surveillance.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry
WHO primary clinical trial registry for Australia and New Zealand, used for trial discovery and protocol metadata. Psychedelic relevance: registry infrastructure includes psychedelic trial records via search, but no dedicated psychedelic evidence vertical.
Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry
Brazil's public clinical trial registry platform for experimental and non-experimental studies in humans. Psychedelic-specific indexing is not offered as a dedicated registry surface.
CTIS (Clinical Trials Information System)
EU clinical trial public portal with explicit psilocybin trial records currently visible.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR)
WHO primary trial registry for China with broad trial metadata coverage. Psychedelic-specific datasets are not presented as a dedicated public vertical.
Citeline
Citeline (formerly Informa Pharma Intelligence) is a global pharmaceutical data and clinical intelligence platform providing AI-driven drug pipeline tracking, trial monitoring, and R&D analytics to life sciences organisations. It is referenced as a data source in the Department of Defense PTSD Adaptive Platform Trial involving SLS-002 (esketamine intranasal spray).
Clarivate Cortellis
Commercial intelligence platform with clinical, regulatory, and real-world evidence datasets for biopharma decision support.
ClinicalTrials.gov
US National Library of Medicine registry and results database with broad global trial coverage, including many psychedelic studies.
EMA EudraVigilance
European pharmacovigilance system for suspected adverse drug reaction reporting. Psychedelic relevance: EMA has hosted a multi-stakeholder psychedelics regulatory workshop and EudraVigilance is the key EU safety channel.
Erowid Center
Erowid Center is a nonprofit educational organization and public information resource on psychoactive substances, including the Erowid Experience Vaults user-report archive and broader harm reduction materials.
EudraCT (EU Clinical Trials Register, legacy)
Legacy EU clinical trials register still relevant for historical records and legacy IDs linked from CTIS; includes trial history relevant to psychedelic development tracking.
FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS)
US FDA adverse-event monitoring infrastructure for regulated products. Psychedelic relevance: FDA has issued draft clinical trial guidance for psychedelic drugs and AEMS is the active public safety-monitoring surface.
FDA MedWatch
US FDA adverse-event and product-problem reporting program with public safety communications and reporting channels.
German Clinical Trials Register
Primary registry for clinical trials in Germany, recognized by WHO as the national primary registry. Psychedelic-specific data is not provided as a dedicated public vertical.
Global Drug Survey
Global anonymous survey platform with explicit psychedelic-use and microdosing self-report outputs in periodic reports.
HMA-EMA Catalogues of Real-World Data Sources and Studies
European catalogues that centralize metadata on real-world data sources and RWD studies for regulatory and research discoverability. These catalogues replaced older ENCePP/EU PAS register-era database surfaces.
Health Canada Canada Vigilance
National adverse reaction reporting and access database for marketed health products in Canada. Psychedelic relevance: Health Canada publishes psilocybin-specific clinical-trial and special-access policy notices.
IQVIA Real World Data
Commercial real-world data products and linked evidence assets used in life sciences research and regulatory support.
ISRCTN Registry
Primary clinical trial registry with global participation and searchable records including psychedelic-related studies; no dedicated psychedelic-specific product surface.
MHRA Yellow Card
UK safety reporting program for medicine and device adverse events. Psychedelic relevance: UK has active policy and trial activity, while public MHRA records indicate no authorized psilocybin medicinal product yet.
Maya Health
Maya Health is a software platform, founded in 2019, that helps psychedelic-therapy practitioners track, measure and visualise client outcomes while building a real-world-data resource for the field. Growing out of academic work linked to Johns Hopkins and Unlimited Sciences, it connects practitioners, participants and researchers and offers analytics dashboards, validated outcome scales and structured session notes.
Medsafe & CARM Pharmacovigilance
New Zealand pharmacovigilance infrastructure operated through Medsafe and CARM for adverse-reaction reporting, analysis, and signal monitoring. Public psychedelic-specific dashboards are limited; this profile is included as core safety infrastructure.
Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb
National pharmacovigilance centre for the Netherlands supporting adverse drug reaction reporting, signal detection, and patient-reporting channels. Public psychedelic-specific evidence views are limited; this profile is included as core safety infrastructure.
PatientsLikeMe
Patient network platform with treatment and condition self-reporting, including explicit psilocybin treatment pages and community-reported outcomes context.
Quantified Citizen
Digital research platform running psychedelic self-report and behavioral studies through app-based participation, including Microdose.me cohorts.
Rocky Mountain Poison & Drug Safety
US poison center and toxicology surveillance organization supporting data collection and safety monitoring operations.
Singapore HSA Adverse Event Reporting
Singapore Health Sciences Authority adverse-event reporting framework for therapeutic products and clinical trials. Included as core safety-monitoring infrastructure; no dedicated psychedelic public reporting surface identified.
Swissmedic ElViS
Swissmedic electronic vigilance infrastructure for adverse drug reaction reporting by healthcare professionals and companies in Switzerland. Included as core safety infrastructure; psychedelic-specific public slices are limited.
TGA DAEN
Australian adverse-event notification database and safety-monitoring framework. Psychedelic relevance: TGA publishes dedicated policy and access guidance for MDMA and psilocybin use.
Uppsala Monitoring Centre
WHO collaborating centre for international drug safety monitoring, stewarding VigiBase and global pharmacovigilance methods.
WHO ICTRP
WHO global trial-search aggregator across multiple primary registries. Psychedelic records are present via source registries, but ICTRP does not provide a dedicated psychedelic evidence vertical.
Frequently asked questions
- What kinds of real-world data exist for psychedelics?
Three broad kinds. Centralised registries and data repositories aggregate structured records across sites. Patient-reported outcome platforms collect experiences and symptom measures directly from individuals. Post-market safety registries track adverse events once treatments reach practice. Each organisation here is classified into one of these groups.
- Can I get access to these datasets for research?
Sometimes. Each profile records an access model, from open access through registration to paid licences and case-by-case agreements. The primary data link on each profile goes to the organisation’s own access point, which is where terms are stated authoritatively.
- How trustworthy are these data sources?
We verify each profile against public sources and record a verification status, the date we last checked, and the number of source links, all visible on the category cards. A stale badge means the record has not been re-verified in over a year. None of this substitutes for reading the organisation’s own methodology notes, which the profiles summarise where available.
- Why does real-world evidence matter if we have clinical trials?
Trials select their participants and control their settings; real-world use does neither. Regulators and payers (insurance companies) increasingly ask for evidence that effects and safety hold outside trial conditions, and state programmes such as Oregon’s generate exactly the naturalistic data trials cannot.