Comparative Effectiveness Study of Two Forms of Ketamine for Treatment-resistant Depression (TREK)
This interventional trial, led by The George Institute, aims to compare the effectiveness of two formulations of ketamine (esketamine (Spravato®) and racemic ketamine), in treating treatment-resistant depression (TRD).
Detailed Description
Randomised, prospective, rater-blinded (outcome assessors) parallel-group comparative effectiveness trial comparing racemic IV ketamine and intranasal esketamine (Spravato®) in people with treatment-resistant depression.
Primary outcomes include comparative effectiveness on depressive symptoms after initial treatment; secondary outcomes include acceptability, safety, quality of life, function and health-economic endpoints with follow-up from 4 weeks to 6 months. Treatments are delivered in participating ketamine clinics following clinic protocols with randomisation to one of the two modalities.
Study Protocol
Preparation
Dosing
Integration
Study Arms & Interventions
Racemic ketamine
experimentalIV racemic ketamine with clinic-guided dose optimisation and titration.
Interventions
- Ketamine0.5 - 1.5 mg/kgvia IV• twice weekly then per clinic• 8 doses total
Typical starting 0.5 mg/kg; titration to max 1.5 mg/kg as needed.
Esketamine (Spravato)
active comparatorIntranasal esketamine dosing per Spravato® product information with clinic-guided adjustments.
Interventions
- Esketamine56 - 84 mgvia Other• twice weekly then weekly then maintenance
Intranasal Spravato®: starting dose 28 or 56 mg (≥65 start 28 mg); options 28/56/84 mg; Weeks1–4 twice weekly, Weeks5–8 weekly, then maintenance.
Participants
Inclusion Criteria
- Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult with treatment-resistant depression (TRD: not responded adequately to at least two different antidepressants of adequate dose and duration) who has a current depressive episode (DSM-5)
- Assessed and attested by clinic psychiatrist as appropriate to receive either racemic ketamine or Spravato® ketamine treatment for TRD
- Aged ≥18 years
- Written informed consent for research study obtained
Exclusion Criteria
- Exclusion Criteria:
- Not able to give informed consent
- Any physical or mental condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with study participation including outcome assessments
- Patients who require an interpreter/translator for the clinic consent process, due to the infeasibility of obtaining an interpreter for research assessments, including self-rated scales
Study Details
- StatusRecruiting
- PhasePhase IV
- Typeinterventional
- DesignRandomizedsingle Blind
- Target Enrollment162 participants
- TimelineStart: 2024-04-01End: 2027-04-30
- Compounds
- Topic