Trial PaperDepressive DisordersMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD)Nitrous OxidePlacebo

A phase 2 trial of inhaled nitrous oxide for treatment-resistant major depression

In a phase 2 trial, inhaled nitrous oxide at 25% concentration improved symptoms of treatment‑resistant major depression and produced fewer adverse effects than the 50% concentration.

1 linked clinical trial·2 references indexed in Blossom·3 cited-by links indexed in Blossom

Authors

  • Nagele, P.
  • Palanca, B. J.
  • Gott, B.

Published

Science Translational Medicine
individual Study

Abstract

Twenty-five percent inhaled nitrous oxide improves symptoms of treatment-resistant major depression with fewer adverse effects than the 50% concentration.

Unlocked with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'A phase 2 trial of inhaled nitrous oxide for treatment-resistant major depression'

Editorial

βBlossom's Take

This is a useful early clinical signal for a non-classic rapid-acting intervention that looks mechanistically adjacent to ketamine but uses a very different delivery route. The comparison between 25% and 50% nitrous oxide also makes the tolerability question concrete, which matters for whether any antidepressant effect can be translated into repeated use.

Half the gas, most of the effect

Sourced

This crossover trial gave the same patients a strong dose of nitrous oxide, a weaker one, and placebo air. You might expect a clean dose ladder, but two weeks on, the lower dose had captured most of the benefit, and the two active doses were not statistically distinguishable from each other.

Improvement over placebo — 2 weeks

Placebo
25% N₂O
-5.19
50% N₂O
-7.00

HDRS-21 points below placebo →

At two weeks, 50% gas beat placebo by 7.0 points and 25% by 5.2, but the gap betweenthe two doses wasn’t significant (P = 0.58). A weaker dose with fewer side effects did most of the work.

Don't read this as a finished efficacy verdict. This was a 24-person crossover pilot; the bars are estimated between-group differences on a clinician score, and the confidence intervals are wide. The takeaway is about side-effect trade-offs, not a licensed dose. Rebuilt from Nagele et al. (2021), Science Translational Medicine; estimated difference vs placebo on HDRS-21.

Conclusion

In this randomized, controlled Phase II crossover trial, L. and colleagues reported several key observations about single 1-hour inhalations of nitrous oxide for severe treatment-resistant major depression. The trial compared inhaled nitrous oxide at 50% and 25% concentrations against placebo and assessed antidepressant effects and adverse events over time. First, both 50% and 25% nitrous oxide produced rapid antidepressant effects in this severely treatment-resistant population. The authors further observed that the magnitude of antidepressant benefit increased over time in some patients and persisted for up to 4 weeks in certain cases. Adverse events were substantially less common at the lower (25%) concentration. Second, categorical clinical outcomes measured three months after study initiation showed a high overall rate of improvement in this sample: 85% of patients had improved, 55% met criteria for treatment response, and 40% were in remission at study completion. By treatment arm, after placebo one of nine patients had a treatment response (11.1%) and one of nine was in remission (11.1%). After 25% nitrous oxide, three of nine patients had a treatment response (33.3%; relative risk (RR) 2.50; 95% CI, 0.43 to 16.30) and two of nine were in remission (22.2%; RR 1.82; 95% CI, 0.27 to 12.84). After 50% nitrous oxide, 5 of 12 patients had a treatment response (41.7%; RR 2.94; 95% CI, 0.57 to 18.02) and 5 of 12 were in remission (41.7%; RR 2.94; 95% CI, 0.57 to 18.02). Third, although 25% and 50% nitrous oxide showed roughly equivalent antidepressant efficacy overall, there was evidence of a dose–response relationship at the 2-week follow-up, and the lower dose had a markedly reduced rate of adverse side effects. The authors also note considerable interindividual variability in time courses of response; incorporating this variability into their statistical models did not eliminate the significance of treatment-related effects. Differences between categorical outcomes were assessed by Fisher's exact test, and RRs with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Koopman asymptotic score.

Expert Research Summary

Go Pro to unlock section-by-section summaries, Blossom's editorial take, and the complete research toolkit.

See Pro Plans

Study Details

References (2)

References cited by this study and indexed in Blossom.

Nitrous Oxide for Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: a Proof-of-Concept Trial

Nagele, P., Duma, A., Kopec, M. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2015)

231 cited
Ketamine and Rapid-Acting Antidepressants: A Window into a New Neurobiology for Mood Disorder Therapeutics

Ari, A., Abdallah, C. G., Sanacora, G. et al. · Annual Review of Medicine (2014)

413 cited

Cited By (3)

Papers indexed in Blossom that reference this study.

Synthetic surprise as the foundation of the psychedelic experience

De Filippo, R., Schmitz, D. · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (2024)

13 cited
Trial of Ketamine Masked by Surgical Anesthesia in Depressed Patients

Lii, T. R., Smith, A. E., Flohr, J. R. et al. · Nature Mental Health (2023)

91 cited
Classical and non-classical psychedelic drugs induce common network changes in human cortex

Dai, R., Larkin, T. E., Huang, Z. et al. · NeuroImage (2023)

48 cited

Your Personal Research Library

Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate research, and organize custom shelves.