An estimate of the number of people with clinical depression eligible for psilocybin-assisted therapy in the United States
The authors estimate that 24% (lower bound), 56% (mid-range) and 62% (upper bound) of US patients with major depressive disorder or treatment-resistant depression would be eligible for psilocybin-assisted therapy under different exclusion scenarios. They find that exclusionary comorbidities—particularly substance and alcohol use disorders and overlapping psychiatric or cardiovascular conditions—drive most ineligibility, and that real demand will hinge on insurance, state regulation and provider availability.
Authors
- Charles Raison
- Elliot Marseille
Published
Abstract
This study aims to estimate the lower, middle, and upper bounds of potential demand for psilocybin-assisted therapy (PSIL-AT) for major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in the United States. We calculated potential PSIL-AT demand for MDD and TRD by estimating the number of U.S. patients with MDD, identifying those in treatment, and determining who qualifies as having TRD. We established a range of estimates using the exclusion criteria from the largest trials to date on PSIL-AT for MDD or TRD. Estimates ranged from lower-bound through stringent criteria, mid-range by focusing on likely real-world scenarios, to upper-bound by accounting for double counting for patients with multiple comorbidities. A significant portion of patients with MDD and TRD is ineligible for PSIL-AT due to disqualifying conditions. Percentage of patients who are eligible are 24% (lower-bound), 56% (mid-range), and 62% (upper-bound). Variance was largely influenced by the removal of alcohol and substance use disorders as exclusion criteria, as well as removing the double counting from comorbid psychiatric and cardiovascular conditions. The analysis outlines the public health implications of providing PSIL-AT for MDD and TRD, emphasizing that the effective demand will be shaped by insurance coverage, state-level regulations, and the availability of trained providers. These findings suggest the need for careful policy planning and resource allocation to ensure equitable access and effective implementation of PSIL-AT across diverse populations and regions.
Research Summary of 'An estimate of the number of people with clinical depression eligible for psilocybin-assisted therapy in the United States'
Introduction
Psilocybin-assisted therapy (PSIL-AT) has been designated by the FDA as a breakthrough therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD). TRD is defined in the paper as failure to have significant symptom relief after at least two adequate antidepressant trials during the current episode. With potential FDA approval and medical legalisation under consideration, understanding the prospective public health impact of PSIL-AT in the United States requires an estimate of demand among people with clinical depression. This study sets out to produce conservative lower-bound, mid-range and upper-bound estimates of the number of patients with MDD and TRD who would be clinically eligible for PSIL-AT. The authors frame these bounds by applying exclusion criteria drawn from the largest PSIL-AT trials, then relaxing or adjusting those criteria to reflect likely real-world practice and to account for comorbidity-driven double counting. The intent is to provide policymakers, payers and providers with a range of plausible demand scenarios to inform resource planning and regulation.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Rab, S. F., Raison, C. L., & Marseille, E. (2024). An estimate of the number of people with clinical depression eligible for psilocybin-assisted therapy in the United States. Psychedelics, 1(2), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.61373/pp024r.0025
References (6)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2022)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)
Raison, C. L., Sanacora, G., Woolley, J. D. et al. · JAMA (2023)
Gattuso, J. J., Perkins, D., Ruffell, S. G. D. et al. · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (2022)
Madsen, M. K., Fisher, P. M., Burmester, D. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2019)
Bogenschutz, M. P., Ross, S., Bhatt, S. R. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2022)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.