Developing an Ethics and Policy Framework for Psychedelic Clinical Care: A Consensus Statement
A multidisciplinary group produced a consensus ethics and policy framework for integrating government‑approved psychedelic medicines into clinical care, articulating 20 consensus points across five core ethical domains. The statement assigns responsible actors for implementation and identifies areas for further research and policy deliberation to promote equitable, safe adoption in mainstream medicine.
Authors
- Michael Mithoefer
- David Yaden
- Charles Grob
Published
Abstract
Importance
As government agencies around the globe contemplate approval of the first psychedelic medicines, many questions remain about their ethical integration into mainstream medical practice.
Objective
To identify key ethics and policy issues related to the eventual integration of psychedelic therapies into clinical practice.
Evidence Review
From June 9 to 12, 2023, 27 individuals representing the perspectives of clinicians, researchers, Indigenous groups, industry, philanthropy, veterans, retreat facilitators, training programs, and bioethicists convened at the Banbury Center at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Prior to the meeting, attendees submitted key ethics and policy issues for psychedelic medicine. Responses were categorized into 6 broad topics: research ethics issues; managing expectations and informed consent; therapeutic ethics; training, education, and licensure of practitioners; equity and access; and appropriate role of gatekeeping. Attendees with relevant expertise presented on each topic, followed by group discussion. Meeting organizers (A.L.M., I.G.C., D.S.) drafted a summary of the discussion and recommendations, noting points of consensus and disagreement, which were discussed and revised as a group.
Findings
This consensus statement reports 20 points of consensus across 5 ethical issues (reparations and reciprocity, equity, and respect; informed consent; professional boundaries and physical touch; personal experience; and gatekeeping), with corresponding relevant actors who will be responsible for implementation. Areas for further research and deliberation are also identified.
Conclusions and Relevance
This consensus statement focuses on the future of government-approved medical use of psychedelic medicines in the US and abroad. This is an incredibly exciting and hopeful moment, but it is critical that policymakers take seriously the challenges ahead.
Research Summary of 'Developing an Ethics and Policy Framework for Psychedelic Clinical Care: A Consensus Statement'
Introduction
Psilocybin and MDMA are moving from largely underground and criminalised use toward authorised medical treatments: Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration has approved psilocybin and MDMA has advanced toward FDA approval in the US, with other regulators likely to follow. This emergence builds on long Indigenous histories of sacramental use and 20th century scientific research, and it raises questions about whether Western health care systems are ethically prepared to integrate psychedelic medicines in ways that respect their cultural origins and manage the distinctive clinical challenges these agents pose. Mcguire and colleagues convened a multidisciplinary workshop to identify key ethics and policy issues that will arise as psychedelic therapies enter mainstream clinical practice. The meeting aimed to generate consensus recommendations to guide clinicians, regulators, training programmes, payers, and other stakeholders about topics such as reparations and reciprocity, informed consent, professional boundaries (including physical touch), practitioner personal experience, and gatekeeping mechanisms for access and safety.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
McGuire, A. L., Cohen, I. G., Sisti, D., Baggott, M., Celidwen, Y., Devenot, N., Gracias, S., Grob, C., Harvey, I., Kious, B., Marks, M., Mithoefer, M., Nielson, E., Öngür, D., Pallas, A., Peterson, A., Schenberg, E. E., Summergrad, P., Waters, B., . . . Yaden, D. B. (2024). Developing an Ethics and Policy Framework for Psychedelic Clinical Care: A Consensus Statement. JAMA Network Open, 7(6), e2414650. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14650
References (8)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Gerber, K., Flores, I. G., Ruiz, A. C. et al. · ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science (2021)
Marks, M., Cohen, I. G. · SSRN (2021)
Smith, D., Faber, S., Buchanan, N. T. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2022)
Erritzoe, D., Roseman, L., Nour, M. R. et al. · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (2018)
Evans, J., Robinson, O., Ketzitzidou-Argyri, E. et al. · PLOS ONE (2023)
Hartogsohn, I. · Drug Science Policy and Law (2017)
Nielson, E. M., Tai, S. J., Lennard-Jones, M. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2021)
Aday, J. S., Skiles, Z., Eaton, N. et al. · Psychedelic Medicine (2023)
Cited By (1)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Luquiens, A., Belahda, D., Graux, C. et al. · Addiction (2025)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.