Trial PaperDepressive DisordersOlder AdultsMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD)Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD)Bipolar DisorderSafety & Risk ManagementEsketamineKetamine

Esketamine vs Midazolam in Boosting the Efficacy of Oral Antidepressants for Major Depressive Disorder

In this single-centre pilot randomised, double-blind trial of 30 adults with major depressive disorder and fluctuating antidepressant response, a single subanaesthetic intravenous dose of esketamine (0.2 mg/kg) added to ongoing oral antidepressants produced markedly higher 2-week response rates (66.7% vs 6.7%) and greater reductions in MADRS scores than midazolam. No serious adverse events, psychotomimetic effects, or clinically significant manic symptoms were observed.

Authors

  • Xiao, C.
  • Zhou, J.
  • Zhu, X.

Published

JAMA Network Open
individual Study

Abstract

Importance

Loss of a previously effective response while still using adequate antidepressant treatment occurs in a relatively high proportion of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD); therefore, there is a need to develop novel effective treatment strategies.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of a single subanesthetic dose of esketamine in boosting the efficacy of oral antidepressants for treating fluctuating antidepressant response in MDD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-center, double-blind, midazolam-controlled pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted at Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University in China. The study enrolled participants aged 18 years and older with fluctuating antidepressant response, defined as patients with MDD experiencing fluctuating symptoms after symptom relief and stabilization. Patient recruitment was conducted from August 2021 to January 2022, and participants were followed-up for 6 weeks. Data were analyzed as intention-to-treat from July to September 2022.

Interventions

All participants in the esketamine-treated group received intravenous esketamine at 0.2 mg/kg in 40 minutes. Participants in the midazolam control group received intravenous midazolam at 0.045 mg/kg in 40 minutes.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the response rate at 2 weeks, defined as a 50% reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Secondary outcomes included response rate at 6 weeks, remission rates at 2 and 6 weeks, and change in MADRS and Clinical Global Impression–Severity score from baseline to 6 weeks; remission was defined by a MADRS score of 10 or lower.

Results

A total of 30 patients (median [IQR] age, 28.0 [24.0-40.0] years; 17 [56.7%] female) were randomized, including 15 patients randomized to midazolam and 15 patients randomized to esketamine; 29 patients completed the study. Response rates at 2 weeks were significantly higher in the esketamine-treated group than in the midazolam control group (10 patients [66.7%] vs 1 patient [6.7%]; P < .001). Participants treated with esketamine experienced significantly greater reduction in MADRS score from baseline to 2 weeks compared with those treated with midazolam (mean [SD] reduction, 15.7 [1.5] vs 3.1 [1.3]; P < .001). No serious adverse events were observed in this trial, and no psychotogenic effects and clinically significant manic symptoms were reported.

Conclusions and Relevance

This pilot randomized clinical trial found that a single subanesthetic dose of esketamine could boost the efficacy of oral antidepressants in treating fluctuating antidepressant response, with a good safety profile.

Available with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'Esketamine vs Midazolam in Boosting the Efficacy of Oral Antidepressants for Major Depressive Disorder'

Introduction

Depression is common, recurrent and disabling, and pharmacotherapy remains the principal treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). The authors highlight a clinically important phenomenon distinct from relapse or recurrence: loss of a previously effective response while a patient remains on an adequate antidepressant regimen. This has been variously termed tachyphylaxis or antidepressant tolerance; in this paper the investigators use the term fluctuating antidepressant response in MDD (FAD) to denote re-emergence of prior symptoms or onset of a new episode despite ongoing adequate antidepressant treatment. Causes of FAD are unclear, evidence-based management options are limited and repeated medication changes may increase adverse effects and risk of treatment resistance, so novel approaches are needed to prevent progression to treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Against this background, Xiao and colleagues evaluated whether a single subanesthetic intravenous dose of esketamine could ‘‘boost’’ the efficacy of patients' ongoing oral antidepressants in people with FAD. The study was designed as a pilot, double-blind, midazolam-controlled randomised clinical trial to assess short- and medium-term efficacy and safety over a 6-week follow-up period, with the aim of providing preliminary effect-size data to inform future trials and potential clinical strategies for managing FAD.

Expert Research Summaries

Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.

Full Text PDF

Full Paper PDF

Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.

Study Details

Related Clinical Trial

References (3)

Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom

Your Personal Research Library

Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.