Evaluation of the peak experience scale as a rapid assessment tool for the strength of a psychoactive experience with 5-MeO-DMT
The three-item Peak Experience Scale (PES) reliably and rapidly measures the strength of 5‑MeO‑DMT experiences, showing dose-related increases, a single PCA component explaining 83.5% of variance, high internal consistency (α = 0.896) and strong correlations with established measures (MEQ-30, EDI, 5D-ASC) but not the CEQ. The authors conclude the PES could be used to gain fast insight into psychedelic intensity in individual patients and to guide dose and re-dose decisions for rapid-acting psychedelics.
Authors
- Johannes Ramaekers
- Nathalie Mason
- Eline Theunissen
Published
Abstract
A three-item Peak Experience Scale (PES) was developed to rapidly evaluate the strength of the psychoactive experience, and to guide the dosing regimen, of the psychedelic 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT; mebufotenin). This paper aims to compare the PES with a range of established questionnaires designed to evaluate the psychedelic experience. Data were gathered from three separate studies in which a 5-MeO-DMT formulation (GH001) was administered via pulmonary inhalation to healthy volunteers and patients with treatment resistant depression (N = 84) as either single doses (0 [placebo], 2, 6, 12, 18 mg) or an incremental individualized dosing regimen (IDR). Apart from the PES, participants also completed the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ-30), the Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), the Ego Dissolution Inventory (EDI) and the 5-Dimensional Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (5D-ASC). The 5-MeO-DMT formulation produced a significant, dose-related increase in PES ratings, with maximal ratings being achieved after the IDR. A principal component analysis (PCA) of the PES items identified a single primary component explaining 83.5% of the variance. PES items also displayed a strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.896). A PCA across all questionnaires indicated a strong and unidimensional loading of the PES, MEQ, EDI and the 5D-ASC, suggesting high interrelatedness. Likewise, individual ratings on the PES were highly correlated to those on the PES, MEQ, EDI and the 5D-ASC, but not the CEQ. The PES is concluded to be an effective tool to rapidly assess the strength of the psychedelic experience with 5-MeO-DMT. The PES could prove useful to gain fast insight into the strength of a psychedelic dose in individual patients and potentially guide dose and re-dose selection of rapid-acting psychedelics.
Research Summary of 'Evaluation of the peak experience scale as a rapid assessment tool for the strength of a psychoactive experience with 5-MeO-DMT'
Introduction
Psychedelic experiences are phenomenologically complex and often difficult to capture with brief instruments. Previous research has produced several multi-item questionnaires to quantify subjective features of altered states, including the 5-Dimensional Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (5D-ASC), the Ego-Dissolution Inventory (EDI), the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ-30) and the Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ). These established tools are informative but time-consuming to administer (typically 10–20 min), and no validated instrument existed to rapidly quantify the overall intensity or profoundness of a psychedelic experience within a minute, a capability that could be useful in clinical contexts and when dosing short-acting compounds. Reckweg and colleagues developed a three-item Peak Experience Scale (PES) intended as a rapid assessment of the strength of the psychoactive experience (PsE), particularly for the short-acting psychedelic 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT; GH001 formulation). The PES uses three visual analogue scale (VAS) items (intensity, loss of control, and profoundness), each scored 0–100 and averaged, with an a priori pragmatic cutoff of ≥75 denoting a Peak Experience (PE). The present pooled analysis of three clinical studies aimed to compare the PES to established questionnaires (MEQ-30, CEQ, EDI, 5D-ASC), evaluate its psychometric properties (internal consistency, dimensionality), and determine whether it is sensitive to dose and suitable to guide an individualized dosing regimen (IDR) for 5-MeO-DMT.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Reckweg, J. T., Mason, N. L., Theunissen, E. L., Svendsen, C. B., Terwey, T. H., & Ramaekers, J. G. (2025). Evaluation of the peak experience scale as a rapid assessment tool for the strength of a psychoactive experience with 5-MeO-DMT. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1543640
Related Clinical Trials
References (29)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Aaronson, S. T., van der Vaart, A., Miller, T. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2024)
Barrett, F. S., Bradstreet, M. P., Leoutsakos, J. M. S. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Barrett, F. S., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Barsuglia, J. P., Davis, A. K., Palmer, R. et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2018)
Cummins, C., Lyke, J. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2013)
Davis, A. K., Streeter Barrett, F., Griffiths, R. R. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2021)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Holze, F., Gasser, P., Müller, F. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2023)
Kangaslampi, S. · Journal of Psychedelic Studies (2023)
Knight, G., Rucker, J., Cleare, A. J. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2022)
Show all 29 referencesShow fewer
Kometer, M., Vollenweider, F. X. · Behavioral Neurobiology of Psychedelic Drugs (2016)
Milliere, R., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L. et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2018)
Mortaheb, S., Fort, L. D., Mason, N. L. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2023)
Nichols, D. E. · Pharmacological Reviews (2016)
Nour, M. R., Evans, J., Nutt, D. J. et al. · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2016)
Palamar, J. J., Acosta, P. · Human Psychopharmacology (2020)
Palhano-Fontes, F., Barreto, D., Onias, H. et al. · Psychological Medicine (2018)
Peill, J. M., Trinci, K. E., Kettner, H. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Reckweg, J., Mason, N. L., van Leeuwen, C. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2021)
Reckweg, J., Uthaug, M. V., Szabo, A. et al. · Journal of Neurochemistry (2022)
Reckweg, J., van Leeuwen, C., Theunissen, E. L. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2023)
Richards, W. A., Rhead, J. C., Dileo, F. B. et al. · Journal of Psychedelic Drugs (2012)
Romeo, B., Hermand, M., Pétillion, A. et al. · Journal of Psychiatric Research (2021)
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Vollenweider, F. X. · PLOS ONE (2010)
Uthaug, M. V., Lancelotta, R., van Oorsouw, K. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2019)
Uthaug, M. V., Van Oorsouw, &. K., Kuypers, &. K. P. C. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2018)
Ramaekers, J. G. · Psychopharmacology (2022)
Yaden, D. B., Griffiths, R. R. · ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science (2020)
Cited By (1)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Cubała, W. J., Bajbouj, M., Bauer, M. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2026)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.