Ketamine for Depression, 4: In What Dose, at What Rate, by What Route, for How Long, and at What Frequency?
This qualitative review and meta-analysis (2017) summarizes major insights on the antidepressant efficacy of ketamine studies, with respect to differences across dosing, rate of administration, route of administration, duration of treatment, and frequency of sessions. It found that there is not enough supporting evidence to draw conclusions about best practices based on how these parameters interact with one another.
Abstract
Background
Ketamine, administered in subanesthetic doses, is an effective off-label treatment for severe and even treatment-refractory depression; however, despite dozens of studies across nearly 2 decades of research, there is no definitive guidance on matters related to core practice issues.
Methods
This article presents a qualitative review and summary about what is known about ketamine dosing, rate of administration, route of administration, duration of treatment, and frequency of sessions.
Results
Ketamine is most commonly administered in the dose of 0.5 mg/kg, but some patients may respond to doses as low as 0.1 mg/kg, and others may require up to 0.75 mg/kg. The ketamine dose is conventionally administered across 40 minutes; however, safety and efficacy have been demonstrated in sessions ranging between 2 and 100 minutes in duration. Bolus administration is safe and effective when the drug is administered intramuscularly or subcutaneously. Whereas the intravenous route is the most commonly employed, safety and efficacy have been described with other routes of administration, as well; these include oral, sublingual, transmucosal, intranasal, intramuscular, and subcutaneous routes. Patients may receive a single session of treatment or a course of treatment during the acute phase, and treatment may rarely be continued for weeks to years to extend and maintain treatment gains in refractory cases. When so extended, the ideal frequency is perhaps best individualized wherein ketamine is dosed a little before the effect of the previous session is expected to wear off.
Conclusions
There is likely to be a complex interaction between ketamine dose, session duration, route of administration, frequency of administration, and related practice. Until definitive studies comparing different doses, rates of administration, routes of administration, and other considerations are conducted, firm recommendations are not possible. From the point of view of clinical practicability, subcutaneous, intranasal, and oral ketamine warrant further study. If domiciliary treatment is considered, the risk of abuse must be kept in mind.
Research Summary of 'Ketamine for Depression, 4: In What Dose, at What Rate, by What Route, for How Long, and at What Frequency?'
Introduction
Andrade opens by situating this article within a series that has previously reviewed ketamine’s efficacy, adverse effects, mechanisms, indications, and choice of enantiomer versus racemate. The present paper focuses specifically on practical treatment parameters: dose, rate of administration, route of delivery, duration of treatment, and session frequency when ketamine is used at subanesthetic doses for depression, with particular attention to treatment‑resistant depression. The introduction frames these topics as unresolved in clinical practice despite nearly two decades of research. The authors aim to synthesise available clinical reports and trials to provide guidance on these core practical issues, while recognising that much of the evidence is uncontrolled or limited and that definitive comparative trials are lacking.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- APA Citation
Andrade, C. (2017). Ketamine for Depression, 4: In What Dose, at What Rate, by What Route, for How Long, and at What Frequency?. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 78(7), e852-e857. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.17f11738
References (4)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Jafarinia, M., Afarideh, M., Tafakhori, A. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2016)
Andrade, C. · Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (2015)
Singh, J. B., Fedgchin, M., Daly, E. J. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2016)
Sanacora, G., Frye, M. A., McDonald, W. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2017)
Cited By (14)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Veraart, J. K. E., Smith-Apeldoorn, S. Y., van der Meij, A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2025)
Macconnel, H. A., Earleywine, M., Radowitz, S. · OSF Preprints (2024)
Nikolin, S., Rodgers, A., Schwaab, A. et al. · EClinicalMedicine (2023)
Breeksema, J. J., Niemeijer, A. R., Kuin, B. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2022)
Brendle, M., Ahuja, S., Della Valle, M. et al. · Future Medicine (2022)
Smith-Apeldoorn, S. Y., Veraart, J. K. E., Spijker, J. et al. · Lancet Psychiatry (2022)
Nikkheslat, N. · Brain Behavior and Immunity - Health (2021)
Keeler, J. L., Treasure, J., Juruena, M. F. et al. · Nutrients (2021)
Worrell, S. D., Gould, T. J. · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (2021)
Conley, A. A., Norwood, A. E. Q., Hatvany, T. C. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2021)
Show all 14 papersShow fewer
Lascelles, K., Marzano, L., Brand, F. et al. · BJPsych Open (2020)
Jelen, L. A., Young, A. H., Stone, J. M. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2020)
Best, S. R. D., Pavel, D. G., Haustrup, N. · Heliyon (2019)
Rong, C., Park, C., Rosenblat, J. D. et al. · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2018)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.