Ketamine: Promising Path or False Prophecy in the Development of Novel Therapeutics for Mood Disorders?
This commentary review (2014) highlights the strength of evidence from recent proof-of-concept studies of ketamine which bear promise for the rapid treatment of depression which currently lacks efficient treatment alternatives. However, the authors disagree about the underlying mechanism mediating these effects and doubt whether there is a sufficient degree of preclinical evidence to warrant the initiation of novel treatment approaches or widespread availability of the drug in clinical settings.
Authors
- Gerard Sanacora
- Alan Schatzberg
Published
Abstract
Large ‘real world’ studies demonstrating the limited effectiveness and slow onset of clinical response associated with our existing antidepressant medications has highlighted the need for the development of new therapeutic strategies for major depression and other mood disorders. Yet, despite intense research efforts, the field has had little success in developing antidepressant treatments with fundamentally novel mechanisms of action over the past six decades, leaving the field wary and skeptical about any new developments. However, a series of relatively small proof-of-concept studies conducted over the last 15 years has gradually gained great interest by providing strong evidence that a unique, rapid onset of sustained, but still temporally limited, antidepressant effects can be achieved with a single administration of ketamine. We are now left with several questions regarding the true clinical meaningfulness of the findings and the mechanisms underlying the antidepressant action. In this Circumspectives piece, Dr. Sanacora and Dr. Schatzberg share their opinions on these issues and discuss paths to move the field forward.
Research Summary of 'Ketamine: Promising Path or False Prophecy in the Development of Novel Therapeutics for Mood Disorders?'
Introduction
Sanacora and Schatzberg frame ketamine as a treatment that has challenged conventional views of antidepressant therapy by producing rapid-onset antidepressant and anxiolytic effects, including in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Earlier research has shown that most approved antidepressants require weeks to exert clinically meaningful effects and act primarily on monoaminergic systems; ketamine’s apparent ability to induce fast, robust, but temporally limited improvements has therefore reinvigorated interest in novel mechanisms of action for mood disorder therapeutics. This Circumspectives piece sets out to evaluate what is known and uncertain about ketamine’s antidepressant effects. Sanacora presents evidence and interpretation that emphasise NMDAR antagonism and downstream glutamatergic modulation as key mechanisms, whereas Schatzberg offers a countervailing view that other mechanisms (including opioid, sigma and monoaminergic effects) may be critical and that an exclusive focus on NMDAR antagonism risks misdirecting drug development. Together the authors review preclinical and clinical data, highlight methodological challenges in the field, and discuss implications for future therapeutic development and safety evaluation.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Sanacora, G., & Schatzberg, A. F. (2015). Ketamine: Promising Path or False Prophecy in the Development of Novel Therapeutics for Mood Disorders?. Neuropsychopharmacology, 40(2), 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2014.261
References (3)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Luckenbaugh, D. A., Niciu, M. J., Ionescu, D. F. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2014)
Murrough, J. W., Iosifescu, D. V., Chang, L. C. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2013)
Murrough, J. W., Perez, A. M., Pillemer, S. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2012)
Cited By (13)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Sapkota, A., Khurshid, H., Qureshi, I. A. et al. · Cureus (2021)
Sumner, R. L., Chacko, E., Mcmillan, R. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2021)
Mcintyre, R. S., Rosenblat, J. D., Nemeroff, C. B. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2021)
Rothberg, R. L., Azhari, N., Haug, N. A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2020)
Sumner, R. L., Mcmillan, R., Spriggs, M. J. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2020)
Dakwar, E., Levin, F. R., Hart, C. L. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2020)
Dakwar, E., Nunes, E. V., Hart, C. L. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2019)
Dakwar, E., Nunes, E. V., Hart, C. L. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2018)
Riva-Posse, P., Reiff, C. M., Edwards, J. A. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2018)
Sloshower, J. A. · Plant Medicines Healing and Psychedelic Science (2018)
Show all 13 papersShow fewer
Maqueda, A. E. · Plant Medicines Healing and Psychedelic Science (2018)
Newport, D. J., Carpenter, L. L., Mcdonald, W. M. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2015)
Al Jurdi, R. K., Swann, A. C., Mathew, S. J. · Current Psychiatry Reports (2015)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.