Integrating Psychedelic Medicines and Psychiatry: Theory and Methods of a Model Clinic
This book chapter (2018) examines how the integration of psychedelic medicines within psychiatry may shift the focusses of clinical symptoms and the underlying neural biomarkers of mental disorders towards a multidimensional perspective of human beings and their suffering, and engages in a more holistic healing process that includes spiritual and existential domains.
Authors
- Jordan Sloshower
Published
Abstract
The past two decades has seen a significant increase in both popular and scientific interest in psychedelic substances and plants as therapeutics for mental illness, addictions, and psychospiritual suffering. Current psychiatric practice privileges a biological paradigm in which the brain is considered the locus of mental illness and symptom-focused treatments are delivered to patients as passive recipients. In contrast, a psychedelic healing paradigm, constructed through examination of different ontologic understandings of plant medicines, is based on a complex multidimensional perspective of human beings and their suffering. This paradigm actively engages the sufferer in addressing root causes of illness through healing on multiple levels of existence, including spiritual and energetic domains. Numerous theoretical, methodological, and ethical challenges complicate the integration of the psychedelic healing paradigm into psychiatric practice. These include developing coherent therapeutic narratives that account for the complex processes by which psychedelic healing occurs and overcoming reductionist tendencies in the medical sciences. Tasked with overcoming such challenges, a model clinic is proposed that seeks to implement and study the psychedelic healing paradigm in a critical, interdisciplinary, and reflexive manner. Such “critical paradigm integration” would employ multimodal patient formulation and treatments, as well as a range of knowledge generation and sharing practices. Outcomes-oriented research would seek to establish an evidence base for the model, while critical dialogues would advance understandings of psychedelic substances and plants and related practices more generally. The clinic would serve as proof of concept for a new model of studying, conceptualizing, and treating mental illness.
Research Summary of 'Integrating Psychedelic Medicines and Psychiatry: Theory and Methods of a Model Clinic'
Introduction
Sloshower frames the chapter by contrasting mainstream psychiatric practice with an alternative "psychedelic healing" paradigm. He argues that contemporary psychiatry privileges a biological model that tends to treat patients as passive recipients of symptom-focused pharmacological or device-based interventions, while often under-resourcing psychotherapeutic, social, and spiritual approaches. By contrast, psychedelic healing is presented as a multidimensional model that intervenes across biological, psychological, social, spiritual, and energetic levels of human experience. The chapter sets out three linked objectives. First, it aims to characterise the differences between the prevailing biomedical paradigm and a psychedelic-informed model of healing. Second, it seeks to identify theoretical, methodological, and ethical challenges to integrating psychedelic approaches into mainstream mental health care. Third, it proposes a concrete implementation: a "model clinic" that would practise and study an integrative, interdisciplinary approach to psychedelic-assisted care using what Sloshower calls "critical paradigm integration."
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Topic
- Author
- APA Citation
Sloshower, J. (2018). Integrating Psychedelic Medicines and Psychiatry: Theory and Methods of a Model Clinic. Plant Medicines, Healing and Psychedelic Science, 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76720-8_7
References (18)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Barrett, F. S., Bradstreet, M. P., Leoutsakos, J. M. S. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Bogenschutz, M. P., Forcehimes, A. A., Pommy, J. A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Brown, T. K., Alper, K. · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (2017)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Erritzoe, D., Williams, T. et al. · PNAS (2012)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Muthukumaraswamy, S., Roseman, L. et al. · PNAS (2016)
Domínguez-Clavé, E., Soler, J., Elices, M. et al. · Brain Research Bulletin (2016)
Fábregas, J. M., González, D., Fondevila, S. et al. · Drug and Alcohol Dependence (2010)
Garcia-Romeu, A., Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W. · Current Drug Abuse Reviews (2015)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2011)
Show all 18 referencesShow fewer
Halpern, J. H., Sherwood, A. R., Hudson, J. I. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2005)
Halpern, J. H., Sherwood, A. R., Passie, T. et al. · Medical Science Monitor (2008)
Johnson, M. W., Garcia-Romeu, A., Griffiths, R. R. · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (2016)
Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2008)
Nichols, D. E. · Pharmacological Reviews (2016)
Ross, S., Bossis, A. P., Guss, J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Sanacora, G., Schatzberg, A. F. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2021)
Thomas, G., Lucas, P., Rielle Capler, N. et al. · Current Drug Abuse Reviews (2013)
Cited By (7)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Kaypak, A. C., Raz, A. · Transcultural Psychiatry (2022)
Whitney, S., Yaden, D. B., Lipson, J. et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2022)
Earleywine, M., Low, F., Lau, C. et al. · Journal of Humanistic Psychology (2022)
Pots, W., Chakhssi, F. · Frontiers in Psychology (2022)
Palhano-Fontes, F., Gorman, I., Nielson, E. M. et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2021)
Nichols, D. E., Walter, H. · Pharmacopsychiatry (2020)
Sloshower, J., Guss, J., Krause, R. et al. · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (2020)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.