Key interindividual determinants in MDMA pharmacodynamics
This review (2018) examines the main interindividual determinants in MDMA pharmacodynamics and highlights the influence of factors such as gender-sex (more pronounced in women because of weight difference), race-ethnicity, and genetic traits.
Authors
- Magí Farré
- Marta Torrens
- Esther Papaseit
Published
Abstract
Introduction: MDMA, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, is a synthetic phenethylamine derivative with structural and pharmacological similarities to both amphetamines and mescaline. MDMA produces characteristic amphetamine-like actions (euphoria, well-being), increases empathy, and induces pro-social effects that seem to motivate its recreational consumption and provide a basis for its potential therapeutic use.Areas covered: The aim of this review is to present the main interindividual determinants in MDMA pharmacodynamics. The principal sources of pharmacodynamic variability are reviewed, with special emphasis on sex-gender, race-ethnicity, genetic differences, interactions, and MDMA acute toxicity, as well as possible therapeutic use.Expert opinion: Acute MDMA effects are more pronounced in women than they are in men. Very limited data on the relationship between race-ethnicity and MDMA effects are available. MDMA metabolism includes some polymorphic enzymes that can slightly modify plasma concentrations and effects. Although a considerable number of studies exist about the acute effects of MDMA, the small number of subjects in each trial limits evaluation of the different interindividual factors and does not permit a clear conclusion about their influence. These issues should be considered when studying possible MDMA therapeutic use.
Research Summary of 'Key interindividual determinants in MDMA pharmacodynamics'
Introduction
MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) is a synthetic phenethylamine with pharmacological similarities to amphetamines and mescaline that produces stimulant and empathogenic effects such as euphoria, increased sociability and enhanced empathy. After early therapeutic interest in the 1970s it became a widely used recreational drug from the 1980s onwards and is currently among the most prevalent illicit stimulants globally. Controlled human studies report sympathomimetic physiological effects (increases in blood pressure, heart rate and temperature), neuroendocrine changes (including cortisol, arginine‑vasopressin and oxytocin), and a plasma pharmacokinetic profile characterised by Tmax around 2 hours and an elimination half‑life of roughly 8–9 hours; MDMA is metabolised via N‑demethylation to MDA and further O‑demethylenation and O‑methylation steps involving COMT and multiple CYP450 isoenzymes. Papaseit and colleagues set out to review the main interindividual determinants of MDMA pharmacodynamics, emphasising sex‑gender, race‑ethnicity, genetic polymorphisms (particularly CYP450 variants and COMT), interactions (polydrug use and concomitant medications), and factors linked to acute toxicity. The review focuses on experimental human studies and clinical intoxication reports to identify sources of variability relevant for both recreational risk and potential therapeutic applications.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Papaseit, E., Torrens, M., Pérez-Mañá, C., Muga, R., & Farré, M. (2018). Key interindividual determinants in MDMA pharmacodynamics. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology, 14(2), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2018.1424832
References (23)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Bershad, A. K., Miller, M. A., Baggot, M. J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Kirkpatrick, M. G., Delton, A. W., de Wit, H. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Kamilar-Britt, P., Bedi, G. · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (2015)
Vizeli, P., Liechti, M. E. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
´dric, C., Hysek, M., Schmid, Y. et al. · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (2013)
de la Torre, R., Farré, M., Roset, P. N. et al. · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2006)
Hysek, C. M., Liechti, M. E. · Psychopharmacology (2012)
Liechti, M. E., Gamma, A., Vollenweider, F. X. · Psychopharmacology (2001)
Hysek, C. M., Fink, A., Simmler, L. D. et al. · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (2013)
Simmler, L. D., Hysek, C. M., Liechti, M. E. · Journal of Clinical Endocrinology Metabolism (2011)
Show all 23 referencesShow fewer
Kuypers, K. P. C., Dolder, P. C., Ramaekers, J. G. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
Vizeli, P., Schmid, Y., Prestin, K. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2017)
Ramaekers, J. G., Kuypers, K. P. C. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2005)
Van Heugten-Van Der Kloet, D., Giesbrecht, T., Van Wel, J. et al. · Psychiatry Research (2015)
Dolder, P. C., Müller, F., Schmid, Y. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Bershad, A. K., Weafer, J. J., Kirkpatrick, M. G. et al. · Social Neuroscience (2016)
Roberts, C. A., Quednow, B. B., Montgomery, C. et al. · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (2017)
Dumont, G., Sweep, F., van der Steen, R. et al. · Social Neuroscience (2009)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Wall, M. B., Erritzoe, D. et al. · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (2013)
Danforth, A. L., Struble, C., Yazar-Klosinski, B. et al. · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (2016)
Grob, C. S., Mithoefer, M. C., Brewerton, T. D. · Lancet Psychiatry (2016)
Bouso, J. C., Doblin, R., Farré, M. et al. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2008)
Oehen, P., Traber, R., Widmer, V. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2012)
Cited By (1)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Williams, M. T., Reed, S., George, J. · Journal of Psychedelic Studies (2021)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.