Meta-correlation of the effect of ketamine and psilocybin induced subjective effects on therapeutic outcome
This meta-analysis (2024, s=31) examines the correlation between subjective effects and therapeutic outcomes for ketamine (s=23, n=471) and psilocybin (s=8, n=183) in depression and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. It finds modest mediating effects of subjective experiences on therapeutic outcomes, with psilocybin showing a stronger mediating effect (R² = 24%) compared to ketamine (R² = 5-10%), and a greater mediating effect observed in SUD compared to depression regardless of the substance used.
Authors
- Dahan, J. D. C.
- Dadiomov, D.
- Bostoen, T.
Published
Abstract
There is some evidence that the subjective effects of ketamine and other psychedelics like psilocybin are crucial for their therapeutic outcomes, such as treatment of depression or substance use disorder (SUD). We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review on the correlation of subjective symptoms and dissociation versus ketamine-induced therapeutic outcomes in patients with depression or SUD. A similar analysis was conducted for psilocybin-induced therapeutic improvement. We retrieved 23 papers studying ketamine (21 on depression, 2 on SUD) in 471 patients and 8 papers studying psilocybin (6 on depression, 2 on SUD) in 183 patients. Our study demonstrated a modest role for subjective effects mediating therapeutic outcomes, with R2-values ranging from 5-10% for ketamine and for psilocybin the R2 was 24%. A greater mediating effect for psilocybin compared to ketamine was detected, particularly when restricting the analysis to depression. Additionally there is a greater mediating effect in SUD than depression, irrespective of treatment.
Research Summary of 'Meta-correlation of the effect of ketamine and psilocybin induced subjective effects on therapeutic outcome'
Introduction
Psychiatric disorders remain prevalent worldwide and current first-line antidepressant treatments have limited and delayed efficacy, prompting interest in alternative pharmacological approaches. Psychedelic and psychoplastogenic drugs such as ketamine and psilocybin have emerged as promising candidates because they promote rapid neural plasticity and can produce marked changes in consciousness, perception, mood and cognition. Despite shared neurobiological actions, these compounds generate qualitatively different subjective experiences: ketamine typically produces short-lived dissociation, whereas psilocybin commonly evokes mystical-type and oceanic-boundlessness experiences. Dahan and colleagues set out to examine whether those subjective effects are quantitatively related to therapeutic benefit. Noting prior inconsistent findings and methodological concerns (timing of measures, measurement instruments, and dose–response issues), the study performs a systematic review and meta-correlation analysis focused on ketamine (including racemic ketamine and esketamine) and psilocybin for treatment of depression and substance use disorder (SUD). The principal research question was the magnitude of the correlation between drug‑induced subjective effects and clinical improvement, and whether this relationship differs between ketamine and psilocybin or between depression and SUD.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topics
- APA Citation
Dahan, J. D. C., Dadiomov, D., Bostoen, T., & Dahan, A. (2024). Meta-correlation of the effect of ketamine and psilocybin induced subjective effects on therapeutic outcome. npj Mental Health Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-024-00091-w
References (19)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Greb, A. C., Vargas, M. V., Duim, W. C. et al. · ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science (2020)
Kadriu, B., Greenwald, M., Ba et al. · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (2020)
Knight, G., Rucker, J., Cleare, A. J. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2022)
Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2022)
Johnson, M. W., Hendricks, P. S., Barrett, F. S. et al. · Pharmacology and Therapeutics (2019)
McCulloch, D. E-W., Madsen, M. K., Jensen, P. S. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2022)
Berman, R. M., Cappiello, A., Anand, A. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2000)
Sos, P., Klirova, M., Novák, T. et al. · Neuropsychiatric Disease And Treatment (2013)
Luckenbaugh, D. A., Niciu, M. J., Ionescu, D. F. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2014)
Mathai, D. S., Meyer, M. J., Storch, E. A. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2020)
Show all 19 referencesShow fewer
Dakwar, E., Anerella, C., Hart, C. L. et al. · Drug and Alcohol Dependence (2014)
Rothberg, R. L., Azhari, N., Haug, N. A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2020)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, &. M., Day, C. M. J. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Bogenschutz, M. P., Forcehimes, A. A., Pommy, J. A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Zarate, C. A., Brutsche, N. E., Ibrahim, L. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2012)
Bowdle, A. T., Radant, A. D., Cowley, D. S. et al. · Anesthesiology (1998)
Barrett, F. S., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Liechti, M. E., Dolder, P. C., Schmid, Y. · Psychopharmacology (2016)
Cited By (1)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Dallery, J., Miller, J. L., Boissoneault, J. et al. · Journal of Eating Disorders (2026)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.