Negative Affect Circuit Subtypes and Neural, Behavioral, and Affective Responses to MDMA: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Rapidly acting therapeutics like 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) are promising treatments for disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, understanding who benefits most and the underlying neural mechanisms remains a critical gap. Stratifying individuals by neural circuit profiles could help differentiate neural, behavioral, and affective responses to MDMA, enabling personalized treatment strategies.

Objective

To investigate whether baseline stratification of individuals based on negative affect circuit profiles, particularly in response to nonconscious threat stimuli, can differentiate acute responses to MDMA.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial, implementing a double-blinded, within-participant, placebo- and baseline-controlled design, was conducted at Stanford University School of Medicine between November 2, 2021, and November 9, 2022, for wave 1 data collection. Participants had used MDMA on at least 2 prior occasions, but not in the past 6 months, and had subthreshold PTSD symptoms and early life trauma but no current psychiatric disorders. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2023, to January 1, 2024.

Interventions

Participants completed 4 visits: 1 baseline session followed by 1 placebo session and 2 MDMA sessions in a randomized order, totaling 64 visits. Baseline functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) assessed the negative affect circuit using a nonconscious threat processing task (NTN).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes included activity and connectivity of amygdala and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) defining the negative affect circuit. Secondary outcomes were behavioral measures of implicit threat bias, likability of threat expressions, and affective assessments.

Results

Sixteen participants (10 [63%] female; mean [SD] age, 40.8 [7.6] years) were stratified into subgroups with high and low levels of NTN activity in the amygdala (NTNA+ [n = 8] and NTNA− [n = 8], respectively), based on a median split of baseline nonconscious threat-evoked fMRI responses. Following administration of the 120 mg of MDMA vs placebo, the NTNA+ subgroup showed significant reductions in amygdala (contrast estimate [CE], −1.43; 95% CI, −2.60 to −0.27; Cohen d, −1.22; P = .02) and sgACC activity (CE, −1.48; 95% CI, −2.42 to −0.54; Cohen d, −1.56; P = .004), increased sgACC-amygdala connectivity (CE, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.02-1.28; Cohen d, 1.02; P = .04), and increased likability of threat expressions (CE, 14.38; 95% CI, 1.46-27.29; Cohen d, 0.86; P = .03) compared with the NTNA− subgroup.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial of MDMA’s acute profiles, 120 mg of MDMA acutely normalized negative affect circuit reactivity in participants stratified by heightened amygdala reactivity at baseline, demonstrating the potential of neuroimaging to identify prospective biomarkers and guide personalized MDMA-based therapies.