Neurocognitive aspects of ketamine and esketamine on subjects with treatment-resistant depression: A comparative, randomized and double-blind study
This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (n=54) finds that both esketamine and (racemic) ketamine improve cognition immediately and up to 7 days later for those suffering from depression (TRD). There were virtually no differences between both subgroups. The study found improvements in executive functions, processing speed, and more.
Authors
- Acioly Luiz Tavares Lacerda
- Gustavo Leal
Published
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate cognition in patients using either ketamine or esketamine to treat TRD. We also evaluate if both ketamine and esketamine as one group influence cognition in patients with TRD. Fifty-four patients with TRD were infused with either ketamine or esketamine and were assessed at three time points: baseline, 24 h, and 7 days after infusion. We applied neuropsychological tests to evaluate executive functions, processing speed, short term memory, and auditory-verbal episodic memory. There is no cognitive difference between ketamine and esketamine, with the exception of one variable. When considered as one group, ketamine and esketamine do not impair cognition; on the contrary, they improve some neuropsychological functions such as visuospatial short-term memory, executive functions, processing speed, and several measures related to episodic verbal memory. Ketamine and esketamine do not present differing cognitive effects when used in antidepressant doses to treat TRD. Furthermore, they rapidly improve many cognitive aspects of patients with TRD at 24 h after the infusion and maintain these effects for at least 7 days.
Research Summary of 'Neurocognitive aspects of ketamine and esketamine on subjects with treatment-resistant depression: A comparative, randomized and double-blind study'
Introduction
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent and often accompanied by cognitive impairments in domains such as executive functioning, attention, memory, verbal fluency and visual learning. A substantial proportion of patients—commonly termed treatment-resistant depression (TRD)—do not respond to standard monoaminergic antidepressants, and both ketamine (racemic mixture) and its S-enantiomer esketamine have emerged as rapid-acting treatments that can produce response or remission within 24–72 hours. Despite clinical efficacy at subanesthetic doses, concerns remain about their cognitive effects because higher, anaesthetic or recreational doses of ketamine produce cognitive deficits; the literature on cognitive outcomes at antidepressant doses is mixed, with studies reporting no impairment and some reporting improvements in specific domains such as visual memory, processing speed and verbal learning. Araújo-De-Freitas and colleagues set out to fill a gap in the literature by directly comparing the cognitive effects of intravenous ketamine and esketamine in patients with TRD. The study reports neuropsychological outcomes collected before and after a single infusion of either drug, testing whether cognitive trajectories differ between the two treatments and whether, when pooled, these drugs affect cognition across a one-week follow-up period. The cognitive evaluation was a secondary outcome of a larger randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, bicentric non-inferiority trial of antidepressant efficacy.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Araújo-de-Freitas, L., Santos-Lima, C., Mendonça-Filho, E., Vieira, F., França, R. J. A. F., Magnavita, G., Cardoso, T. L., Correia-Melo, F. S., Leal, G. C., Jesus-Nunes, A. P., Souza-Marques, B., Marback, R., Teles, M., Echegaray, M. V., Beanes, G., Guerreiro-Costa, L. N. F., Mello, R. P., Rabanea, T., Lucchese, A. C., . . . Quarantini, L. C. (2021). Neurocognitive aspects of ketamine and esketamine on subjects with treatment-resistant depression: A comparative, randomized and double-blind study. Psychiatry Research, 303, 114058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114058
References (9)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Berman, R. M., Cappiello, A., Anand, A. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2000)
Hashimoto, K. · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (2019)
Leal, G. C., Bandeira, I. D., Correia-Melo, F. S. et al. · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (2020)
Murrough, J. W., Perez, A. M., Pillemer, S. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2012)
Murrough, J. W., Burdick, K. E., Levitch, C. F. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2014)
Chen, X., Hou, X., Bai, D. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2019)
Yang, C., Shirayama, Y., Zhang, J-C. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2020)
Zhang, J., Hashimoto, K., Li, S. · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (2014)
Zhu, W., Ding, Z., Zhang, Y. et al. · Neuroscience Bulletin (2016)
Cited By (2)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Zavaliangos-Petropulu, A., Mcclintock, S. M., Khalil, J. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2023)
Shiroma, P. R., Velit-Salazar, M. R., Vorobyov, Y. · Clinical Drug Investigation (2022)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.