Older AdultsAnxiety Disorders

Reducing the Harms of Nonclinical Psychedelics Use Through a Peer-Support Telephone Helpline

This data analysis study (n=884) examines the impact of a psychedelic helpline on mitigating risks associated with nonclinical psychedelic use. The findings suggest that 65.9% of callers experienced a de-escalation in psychological distress due to the helpline. Additionally, 29.3% reported they could have been harmed, 12.5% might have dialed 911, and 10.8% could have visited an emergency room had it not been for their interaction with the helpline, implying the helpline may prevent harmful outcomes and alleviate strain on emergency and medical services.

Authors

  • Rachel Yehuda

Published

Psychedelic Medicine
individual Study

Abstract

Introduction

A resurgence of interest in the use of psychedelics for mental health and wellness has stimulated greater experimentation with psychedelics in society. Although clinical psychedelic trials protect research participants by offering a safe setting, thorough preparation, and containment during and after ingestion of psychedelic medicines, many try these substances without the benefit of these safeguards.

Materials and Methods

We analyzed data gathered from 884 callers to a psychedelic helpline to determine whether a helpline model could reduce the risks associated with nonclinical psychedelics use.

Results

In total, 65.9% of callers indicated that the helpline de-escalated them from psychological distress. If not for their conversation with the helpline, 29.3% of callers indicated they may have been harmed; 12.5% indicated that they may have called 911; and 10.8% indicated they may have gone to the emergency room.

Conclusion

The data suggest that access to a psychedelic helpline surrounding psychedelic experiences may avert harmful outcomes and offset the burden on emergency and medical services.

Available with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'Reducing the Harms of Nonclinical Psychedelics Use Through a Peer-Support Telephone Helpline'

Introduction

Earlier research indicates that psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) delivered in clinical settings includes multiple safeguards — medical and psychological screening, preparatory sessions, supervised dosing, and postdosing integration — which aim to maximise therapeutic benefit and reduce risk. By contrast, many people now use psychedelics outside clinical settings where those protections are absent. The extracted text notes rising nonclinical use in recent years, citing survey data that show increased past-year use among young adults and middle-aged adults, and highlights that harms from nonclinical use tend to be psychological (for example, distress, panic, or risky behaviour during so-called "bad trips") rather than toxicological in nature. This study sets out to examine whether a peer-support telephone helpline can reduce risks associated with nonclinical psychedelics use. Specifically, Pleet and colleagues piloted an existing peer-support helpline to determine whether conversations with trained volunteers de-escalated callers in distress and might avert emergency service use or other harms in naturalistic psychedelic contexts.

Expert Research Summaries

Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.

Full Text PDF

Full Paper PDF

Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.

Study Details

  • Study Type
    individual
  • Journal
  • Topics
  • Author
  • APA Citation

    Pleet, M. M., White, J., Zamaria, J. A., & Yehuda, R. (2023). Reducing the Harms of Nonclinical Psychedelics Use Through a Peer-Support Telephone Helpline. Psychedelic Medicine, 1(2), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1089/psymed.2022.0017

References (10)

Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom

Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression

Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)

927 cited
Effects of Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy on Major Depressive Disorder

Davis, A. K., Barrett, F. S., May, D. G. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2021)

1015 cited
Single-Dose Psilocybin for a Treatment-Resistant Episode of Major Depression

Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2022)

656 cited
MDMA-assisted therapy for severe PTSD: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study

Mitchell, J., Bogenschutz, M. P., Lilienstein, A. et al. · Nature Medicine (2021)

Psychedelic Harm Reduction and Integration: A Transtheoretical Model for Clinical Practice

Palhano-Fontes, F., Gorman, I., Nielson, E. M. et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2021)

Human hallucinogen research: guidelines for safety

Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2008)

Survey study of challenging experiences after ingesting psilocybin mushrooms: Acute and enduring positive and negative consequences

Carbonaro, T. M., Bradstreet, M. P., Barrett, F. S. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)

Adverse experiences resulting in emergency medical treatment seeking following the use of magic mushrooms

Kopra, E., Ferris, J. A., Winstock, A. R. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)

Adverse effects of psychedelics: From anecdotes and misinformation to systematic science

Neil, J. C., Nutt, D. J. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)

Cited By (1)

Papers in Blossom that reference this study

Trip killers: Addressing a critical knowledge gap in psychedelic research

O’Mahony, B., Harrington, C., Harkin, A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2026)

Your Personal Research Library

Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.

Reducing the Harms of Nonclinical Psychedelics... — Research Summary & Context | Blossom