The Power of Social Attribution: Perspectives on the Healing Efficacy of Ayahuasca
The paper argues that Indigenous and biomedical frameworks for ayahuasca are ontologically incommensurate: Indigenous efficacy is understood as correct communication with non‑human powers mediated by ritual, whereas modern medicine explains effects via MAO inhibition and dimethyltryptamine‑triggered neuropsychological processes, so one cannot legitimately be used to validate the other. It also highlights the colonial dynamics in neo‑shamanic and recreational appropriation and calls for these issues to be questioned and resolved in any application of ayahuasca.
Authors
- Brabec de Mori, B.
Published
Abstract
During the last decades, ayahuasca gained much popularity among non-Indigenous and out-of-Amazonia based populations. In popular culture, it has been advertised as a natural remedy that was discovered by Indigenous peoples ante millennia and that has been used for shamanic healing of all kinds of ailments. This “neo-shamanic,” and often recreational, use of ayahuasca, however, has to be distinguished from traditional Indigenous praxes on the one hand, and, on the other hand, from medical investigation in the modern world. The former, Indigenous use mainly understands ayahuasca as an amplifying power for interacting with non-human beings in the animal, plant, or spirit realms. Within this paradigm, efficacy is not dependent on the drug, but on the correct communication between the healer (or sorcerer) and the non-human powers that are considered real and powerful also without resorting to ayahuasca. The latter, modern mode of understanding, contrastingly treats the neurochemical processes of MAO inhibition and dimethyltryptamine activity as trigger mechanisms for a series of psychological as well as somatic responses, including positive outcomes in the treatment of various mental conditions. I argue that there is an ontological incommensurability occurring especially between the Indigenous and medicinal concepts of ayahuasca use (with recreational use in its widest understanding trying to make sense from both sides). Modern medical applications of ayahuasca are so fundamentally different from Indigenous concepts that the latter cannot be used to legitimate or confirm the former (and vice versa). Finally, the deep coloniality in the process of appropriation of the Indigenous by the modern has to be questioned and resolved in any case of ayahuasca application.
Research Summary of 'The Power of Social Attribution: Perspectives on the Healing Efficacy of Ayahuasca'
Introduction
Gearin frames ayahuasca use as occurring in three overlapping social spheres: traditional Indigenous and Mestizo communities, neo-shamanic and recreational contexts largely outside the Amazon, and Western clinical/therapeutic settings. The paper situates recent popular and scientific interest in ayahuasca within a history of shifting meanings, arguing that contemporary accounts often import and reconfigure Indigenous ideas about the substance in ways that reflect colonial power relations and cultural appropriation. The author highlights a tension between two dominant explanatory models: an Indigenous animist logic that locates efficacy in relations with non-human beings mediated by specialists, and a Western naturalist-medical logic that treats the brew’s neuropharmacology as the principal mechanism of therapeutic effect. The perspective sets out to compare these three modes of use and to analyse how "social attributions"—the discourses and beliefs ascribed to ayahuasca—shape perceptions of its healing efficacy. Gearin aims to show that differing ontologies underlie Indigenous, neo-shamanic, and clinical practices, that contemporary therapeutic and recreational uses draw heavily on constructed images of Indigeneity and ritual, and that these processes often go unexamined in scientific research and popular accounts. The paper therefore seeks both to map these differences and to urge that medical research explicitly account for contextual and attributional factors.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topic
- APA Citation
Brabec de Mori, B. (2021). The Power of Social Attribution: Perspectives on the Healing Efficacy of Ayahuasca. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748131
References (6)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Dos Santos, R. G., Hallak, J. E., Bouso, J. C. · Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology (2017)
Krebs, T. S., Johansen, P. ˚. Ø. · PLOS ONE (2013)
Palhano-Fontes, F., Barreto, D., Onias, H. et al. · Psychological Medicine (2018)
Riba, J., Urbano, G., Morte, A. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2001)
Talin, P., Sanabria, E. · International Journal of Drug Policy (2017)
Uthaug, M. V., Mason, N. L., Toennes, S. W. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2021)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.