Are Ecstasy Induced Serotonergic Alterations Overestimated For The Majority Of Users?
By comparing 10 serotonin-transporter neuroimaging studies with Global Drug Survey data, the authors show that imaging participants fall in the top 5–10% of ecstasy users and consumed on average ~720% more pills per year. This suggests the neuroimaging literature has focused on unusually heavy users and likely overestimates serotonergic alterations for the majority of ecstasy users.
Authors
- David Erritzoe
- Balázs Szigeti
- Adam Winstock
Published
Abstract
Background
Neuroimaging studies imply that the regular use of ±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), the major constituent of ecstasy pills, alters the brain’s serotonergic system in a dose-dependent manner. However, the relevance of these findings remains unclear due to limited knowledge about the ecstasy/MDMA use pattern of real-life users.
Aims
We examined the representativeness of ecstasy users enrolled in neuroimaging studies by comparing their ecstasy use habits with the use patterns of a large, international sample.
Methods
A systematic literature search revealed 10 imaging studies that compare serotonin transporter levels in recreational ecstasy users to matched controls. To characterize the ecstasy use patterns we relied on the Global Drug Survey, the world’s largest self-report database on drug use. The basis of the dose comparison were the Usual Amount (pills/session), Use Frequency (sessions/month) and Dose Intensity (pills/year) variables.
Results
Both the average Usual Amount (pills/session) and Use Frequency (sessions/month) of neuroimaging study participants corresponded to the top 5–10% of the Global Drug Survey sample and imaging participants, on average, consumed 720% more pills over a year than the Global Drug Survey participants.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that the serotonin brain imaging literature has focused on unusually heavy ecstasy use and therefore the conclusions from these studies are likely to overestimate the extent of serotonergic alterations experienced by the majority of people who use ecstays.
Research Summary of 'Are Ecstasy Induced Serotonergic Alterations Overestimated For The Majority Of Users?'
Introduction
MDMA (±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine), the principal active ingredient in ecstasy tablets, is widely used recreationally and has also attracted interest as a potential therapeutic agent. At the molecular level MDMA strongly affects serotonergic neurotransmission: it increases synaptic serotonin and its metabolite levels, alters reuptake mechanisms and influences related hormonal systems. Neuroimaging studies using PET and SPECT have frequently reported large reductions in cortical serotonin transporter (SERT) binding in people who use ecstasy, with reported group differences in the order of 40–70% compared with matched controls, and animal studies show similar SERT declines after chronic MDMA exposure. Szigeti and colleagues note a key uncertainty underlying this literature: whether participants enrolled in SERT imaging studies are representative of the broader population of recreational ecstasy users. The paper therefore aims to compare the ecstasy use patterns of participants in SERT imaging studies with data from the Global Drug Survey (GDS), a large international, self‑selected survey of drug use. In addition, the authors collate quantitative pill‑testing data from three drug‑checking services to characterise variability in MDMA content per pill and to assess whether pill strength could explain any differences in exposure between imaging samples and the wider user population.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topic
- Authors
- APA Citation
Szigeti, B., Winstock, A. R., Erritzoe, D., & Maier, L. J. (2018). Are Ecstasy Induced Serotonergic Alterations Overestimated For The Majority Of Users?. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 32(7), 741-748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881118767646
References (7)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Bedi, G., Hyman, D., De Wit, H. · Biological Psychiatry (2010)
´dric, C., Hysek, M., Schmid, Y. et al. · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (2013)
Kirkpatrick, M. G., Lee, R., Wardle, M. C. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2014)
Mithoefer, M. C., Wagner, M. T., Mithoefer, A. T. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2010)
Mithoefer, M. C., Wagner, M. T., Mithoefer, A. T. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2012)
Oehen, P., Traber, R., Widmer, V. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2012)
Parrott, A. C. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2014)
Cited By (4)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
van Amsterdam, J., Peters, G-J. Y., Pennings, E. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2021)
Feduccia, A. A., Jerome, L., Yazar-Klosinski, B. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2019)
Carlyle, M., Stevens, T., Fawaz, L. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2019)
Müller, F., Brändle, R., Liechti, M. E. et al. · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (2019)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.