Trial PaperDepressive DisordersPlaceboPsilocybin

CSF galanin and noradrenaline downregulation by psilocybin therapy in major depressive disorder

This secondary analysis of a randomised, placebo-controlled trial found that psilocybin selectively reduced cerebrospinal fluid galanin and noradrenaline in people with major depressive disorder. The results suggest that changes in these two signalling chemicals may be part of psilocybin’s biological effect.

1 linked clinical trial·5 references indexed in Blossom

Authors

  • Johan Lundberg

Published

Neuropsychopharmacology
individual Study

Abstract

Psilocybin is a rapid-acting antidepressant, but its mechanism of action in major depressive disorder remains unclear. In this secondary analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trial with multimodal CSF and blood biomarker measurements, psilocybin selectively reduced CSF galanin and noradrenaline, implicating that normalization of these co-transmitters is a key pharmacodynamic signature.

Unlocked with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'CSF galanin and noradrenaline downregulation by psilocybin therapy in major depressive disorder'

Editorial

βBlossom's Take

This study matters because it moves beyond symptom scores and points to a specific CSF signal that changes with psilocybin in depression, with galanin standing out as the strongest correlate of improvement. The paired placebo-controlled design makes the biomarker finding more persuasive than a simple pre-post observation, even though the small sample means it remains an early signal rather than a settled mechanism.

Introduction

Major depressive disorder remains a major cause of disability, and many patients do not achieve remission with first-line treatments, with a substantial subgroup meeting criteria for treatment-resistant depression. The introduction argues that this therapeutic gap reflects incomplete understanding of the biology of depression and the need for mechanistically informative biomarkers. Psilocybin has emerged as a promising rapid-acting antidepressant, but its biological mechanism in MDD is still unclear. Paslawski and colleagues set out to characterise the biological effects of psilocybin-assisted therapy in MDD using a randomised, placebo-controlled secondary analysis with a multi-modal biomarker strategy. The study focused on cerebrospinal fluid monoamines and metabolites, inflammatory cytokines, BDNF, plasma proteomics, and p11 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, with the aim of identifying molecular signatures linked to treatment response and to psilocybin’s proposed neuroplastic and immunological effects.

Methods

This was a secondary analysis of a previously described randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 35 participants with MDD assigned to psilocybin or niacin. Samples were collected 1-2 days before dosing and again about 14 days later. Study medication was administered with 200 mL of water. Participants were monitored by psychologists, with a physician available if needed. Cerebrospinal fluid was obtained by lumbar puncture at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 level while participants were upright. Five millilitres of CSF was collected, immediately centrifuged, divided into 1 mL aliquots, and frozen until analysis. Seventeen participants in each group provided paired blood samples, and paired CSF samples were available from 14 psilocybin-treated participants and 11 placebo participants. Only individuals with paired samples were included in the statistical analyses. The biomarker programme included a targeted cytokine panel (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ), monoamine neurotransmitters and metabolites in CSF, BDNF and proBDNF/BDNF, Olink Target 96 Metabolism proteomics, and p11 measurements in PBMCs and leukocyte subpopulations. The psilocybin and placebo groups were broadly similar in age, MADRS score, and sex ratio in the paired-sample subsets reported. The study had ethical approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority and the Swedish Medical Products Agency, and all participants gave written informed consent. For the follow-up analyses, changes in analyte levels from baseline to the post-treatment visit were compared between groups using baseline values as covariates. The extracted text does not give further detail on the specific statistical model beyond this adjustment.

Results

In the CSF analyses, psilocybin was associated with lower galanin and lower noradrenaline at follow-up compared with placebo. In the proteomic panel, psilocybin also showed reduced SOST and increased CLUL1. The text notes additional trends in other proteins, but the main reported significant changes were galanin, noradrenaline, SOST, and CLUL1. No differences were seen in p11 levels in PBMCs or in leukocyte subpopulations. CSF proBDNF/BDNF showed substantial variability and no significant change. The targeted cytokine panel did not show significant treatment-related changes in IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, or IFN-γ. When baseline-to-follow-up changes in analytes were correlated with change in MADRS scores, the strongest association was for galanin. The next strongest correlations were for adrenaline, SOST, SDC4, and serotonin. Galanin and SOST were positively correlated with MADRS change, whereas adrenaline, serotonin, and SDC4 were negatively correlated with MADRS change. The extracted text does not provide the exact correlation coefficients or p-values for these associations.

Discussion

The authors interpret the study as identifying a multimodal CSF biomarker signature of psilocybin-assisted therapy in MDD, with the most robust finding being reduced CSF galanin. They emphasise that this change occurred both within the psilocybin group and relative to placebo, and that galanin change was strongly correlated with change in MADRS scores. They frame galanin as a stress-inducible inhibitor of monoaminergic firing that is co-localised with noradrenaline in locus coeruleus neurons and with serotonin in dorsal raphe neurons, and they note that earlier post-mortem and genetic studies have linked galanin signalling to depression. The discussion argues that the simultaneous reduction in CSF noradrenaline is unlikely to be incidental. The authors propose that psilocybin’s 5-HT2A agonism may directly suppress locus coeruleus activity, lowering noradrenaline, or that both markers reflect a normalisation of locus coeruleus hyperactivity in depression. They also note that antidepressants that reduce locus coeruleus activity may decrease galanin expression, suggesting galanin may track locus coeruleus activity rather than simply oppose it. Beyond galanin and noradrenaline, the authors view the changes in SOST and CLUL1, and the trends in SEMA3F and NT-proBNP, as potentially reflecting a less stressed, less immune-activated, and less vascularly strained state, although none of these proteins had previously been linked to MDD, psilocybin, or niacin. They present this as broadly consistent with psilocybin’s proposed neuronal network resetting effects. The authors also discuss the absence of significant cytokine, BDNF, and p11 effects. They suggest that the timing of sampling may explain the cytokine null findings, because inflammatory changes may be strongest in the first week after treatment. For p11, they suggest mechanistic differences from SSRIs and possibly a different time course for rapid-acting agents, so the null result is presented as a constraint on future hypothesis testing rather than evidence against a role for p11. The main limitations identified are the modest sample size for biomarker analyses, the possibility that a single sampling time point missed time-sensitive molecular effects, and clinical heterogeneity in the cohort, including differences in severity, treatment history, and inflammatory subtype. The authors conclude that the study provides a neurochemical and proteomic characterisation of psilocybin’s effects in MDD and supports the galanin-noradrenaline axis as a key pharmacodynamic signature. They state that reduced CSF galanin is a novel biomarker candidate that needs validation in larger cohorts and further correlation with clinical outcomes.

Expert Research Summary

Go Pro to unlock section-by-section summaries, Blossom's editorial take, and the complete research toolkit.

See Pro Plans
View full paper sections

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study cohort has been described previously. In brief, 35 participants were randomized to psilocybin or niacin. Samples were collected 1-2 days before dosing, and study medication was administered with 200 mL of water. CSF sampling was performed through lumbar punctures at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 level with the subject in an upright position. 5 ml of CSF was sampled and immediately centrifugated. The fluid was then divided into 1 ml aliquots and frozen until analyzed. Participants were monitored by psychologists, with a physician available if needed. Follow-up sampling was conducted approximately 14 days later. Seventeen participants in each group provided paired blood samples. For CSF, paired samples were obtained from 14 psilocybin-treated and 11 placebo participants. Only individuals with paired samples were included in statistical analyses. For PBMC analyses, the psilocybin group had a mean age of 40.3 years, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) 25.9, and a 10:7female-to-male ratio; the placebo group had a mean age of 44.0 years, MADRS 26.1, and a ratio of 10:7. For CSF analyses, the psilocybin group had a mean age of 38.2 years, MADRS 25.5, and a ratio of 9:5, while the placebo group had a mean age of 47.2 years, MADRS 25.8, and a ratio of 8:3. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority and the Swedish Medical Products Agency. All participants provided written informed consent. Detailed description of all procedures can be found in the supplementary information.

RESULTS

The changes in analyte levels between the placebo (niacin) and psilocybin-treated groups at the follow-up visit were analyzed using baseline levels as a covariate. In CSF protein analyses, combining a targeted cytokine panel (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ) with the Olink Target 96 Metabolism panel, the psilocybin group exhibited reduced levels of galanin (GAL) and SOST, alongside increased levels of CLUL1 (Fig.). Monoamine analysis revealed decreased noradrenaline levels in the psilocybin group (Fig.). No differences were observed in p11 levels in PBMCs or across leukocyte subpopulations (Fig.). CSF proBDNF/BDNF showed large variability with no significant changes. Finally, we assessed whether changes in analyte levels from baseline to the post-treatment visit correlated with changes in the MADRS. The strongest correlations were observed for galanin (Fig.), followed by adrenaline (Fig.), SDC4 (Fig.), SOST (Fig.), and serotonin (Fig.). Both galanin and SOST were positively correlated with changes in MADRS scores, whereas adrenaline, serotonin, and SDC4 were negatively correlated with MADRS change.

DISCUSSION

This multi-modal biomarker study identified CSF alterations by psilocybin-assisted therapy in MDD. The most robust finding was a marked reduction of CSF galanin in the psilocybin group, both within-group and versus placebo at follow-up, and strong correlation between galanin and the MADRS score change from baseline to post-treatment visit. Galanin is a 29-30 amino acid neuropeptide, co-localized with noradrenaline in locus coeruleus (LC) neurons and serotonin in dorsal raphe neuronsand previously associated with MDD. Galanin acts as a stress-inducible inhibitor of monoaminergic firing via Gi/o-coupled GALR1 and GALR3 receptors. In MDD, post-mortem data show increased galanin and GALR3 expression in these regions with reduced DNA methylation, consistent with enhanced galaninergic inhibition of monoaminergic output; genetic studies further link galanin polymorphisms to MDD risk. The observed downregulation of CSF galanin after psilocybin aligns with this pathophysiological model. The concurrent reduction of CSF NA, the only monoamine change observed, and galanin is unlikely to be coincidental. In the LC, galanin and noradrenaline are co-released, whereby galanin may inhibit LC firing via GALR1/3 autoreceptors and reduce noradrenaline release into downstream projection targets and may promote anxiety like behavior over the course of hours to days. However, an apparent paradox arises: if psilocybin reduces galanin, one might expect disinhibition of noradrenaline release and thus elevated rather than reduced CSF NA. Several mechanisms may explain parallel decreases. Psilocybin's 5-HT2A agonism can directly suppress LC activity, lowering noradrenaline independently of galanin. Alternatively, both reductions may reflect normalization of LC hyperactivity in MDD, where galanin and noradrenaline elevated. Consistent with this, antidepressants that reduce LC activity also decrease galanin expression, suggesting galanin tracks LC activity rather than simply opposing it. Beyond galanin, the proteomics analysis identified significant changes in SOST and CLUL1 and trends in downregulation of SEMA3F and NT-proBNP. These proteins are involved in diverse processes spanning Wnt-mediated tissue remodeling and osteokine signaling (SOST), cellular stress and metabolic regulation (CLUL1), axonal guidance and synaptic circuit refinement (SEMA3F), and cardiometabolic and vascular homeostasis (NT-proBNP). None of them has previously been associated with MDD, psilocybin, or niacin. Their coordinated change suggests a shift toward a less stressed, less immune-activated, and less vascularly strained brain state. This pattern is consistent with psilocybin's neuronal network resetting effects. A notable aspect of the present study is the lack of significant psilocybin-induced changes in cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ) and BDNF. Although prior work in healthy volunteers showed acute reductions in TNF-α and sustained decreases in IL-6 and CRP, the discrepancy with this MDD cohort may involve several factors. Timing of sample collection is critical, as cytokine effects appear stronger within the first week; later sampling, as done here, may miss these changes. p11 was measured in PBMC subsets because decreases in NK cell and monocyte p11 have been associated with subsequent antidepressant response to chronic citalopram. The absence of a p11 effect in the psilocybin group may reflect mechanistic differences from SSRIs, which directly elevate synaptic serotonin and may more strongly recruit p11dependent serotonin receptor trafficking than a rapidly acting 5-HT2A agonist. p11 regulation by rapid-acting agents may also follow a different time course than with chronic SSRIs, so a relevant change could have occurred outside our sampling window. Accordingly, the null p11 finding here should be viewed not as evidence against a role for p11 in psilocybin's mechanism, but as a constraint that can refine hypotheses and timing for future studies. Several limitations should be acknowledged. Although the cohort size was sufficient for meeting primary clinical endpoints, it may have been underpowered to detect modest effects in secondary biomarker analyses. Biosampling timing is a key variable: psilocin has a ~2-3 h half-life, and while neuroplastic effects persist, optimal sampling windows for specific molecular readouts likely differ and cannot be captured at a single time point. Clinical heterogeneity within the cohort (MDD severity, treatment history, inflammatory subtype) may have diluted effects that could be evident in more homogeneous subgroups. In conclusion, this study provides a neurochemical and proteomics characterization of psilocybin's effects on CSF in MDD, identifying downregulation of the galanin-noradrenaline axis as a key pharmacodynamic signature. Reduced CSF galanin emerges as a novel, biomarker of antidepressant effect that warrants validation in larger cohorts and further correlation with clinical outcomes. These findings refine the mechanistic framework for psilocybin therapy and suggest the galanin system as a potential mediator of its sustained neurobiological effects.

Full Paper Sections

Go Pro to read the extracted full-text sections.

Full Text PDF

Full Paper PDF

Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.

Study Details

References (5)

References cited by this study and indexed in Blossom.

Single-Dose Psilocybin for a Treatment-Resistant Episode of Major Depression

Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2022)

1057 cited
Single-Dose Psilocybin Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Raison, C. L., Sanacora, G., Woolley, J. D. et al. · JAMA (2023)

468 cited
Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression

Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)

1334 cited
Short-Term and Late-Term Effects of Psilocybin on Symptoms in Major Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yngwe, H., Plavén-Sigray, P., Ekman, C. J. et al. · JAMA Network Open (2026)

Psilocybin induces acute and persisting alterations in immune status in healthy volunteers: An experimental, placebo-controlled study

Mason, N. L., Szabo, A., Kuypers, K. P. C. et al. · Brain Behavior and Immunity - Health (2023)

77 cited

Your Personal Research Library

Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate research, and organize custom shelves.