Effects of MDMA on attention to positive social cues and pleasantness of affective touch
This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (n=36) investigated the effects of MDMA (52.5 to 105 mg/kg) and methamphetamine (20 mg) in healthy young adults on behavioral and psychophysiological response to socially relevant, “affective” touch, and visual attention to emotional faces. The tests showed that MDMA positively influenced responses to affective touch, but neither drug influenced ratings of observed touch.
Authors
- Harriet de Wit
- Anya Bershad
Published
Abstract
The psychostimulant drug ±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) reportedly produces distinctive feelings of empathy and closeness with others. MDMA increases social behavior in animal models and has shown promise in psychiatric disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). How it produces these prosocial effects is not known. This behavioral and psychophysiological study examined the effects of MDMA, compared with the prototypical stimulant methamphetamine (MA), on two measures of social behavior in healthy young adults: (i) responses to socially relevant, “affective” touch, and (ii) visual attention to emotional faces. Men and women (N = 36) attended four sessions in which they received MDMA (0.75 or 1.5 mg/kg), MA (20 mg), or a placebo in randomized order under double-blind conditions. Responses to experienced and observed affective touch (i.e., being touched or watching others being touched) were assessed using facial electromyography (EMG), a proxy of affective state. Responses to emotional faces were assessed using electrooculography (EOG) in a measure of attentional bias. Subjective ratings were also included. We hypothesized that MDMA, but not MA, would enhance the ratings of pleasantness and psychophysiological responses to affective touch and increase attentional bias toward positive facial expressions. Consistent with this, we found that MDMA, but not MA, selectively enhanced ratings of pleasantness of experienced affective touch. Neither drug altered the ratings of pleasantness of observed touch. On the EOG measure of attentional bias, MDMA, but not MA, increased attention toward happy faces. These results provide new evidence that MDMA can enhance the experience of positive social interactions; in this case, pleasantness of physical touch and attentional bias toward positive facial expressions. The findings are consistent with evidence that the prosocial effects are unique to MDMA relative to another stimulant. Understanding the behavioral and neurobiological processes underlying the distinctive social effects of MDMA is a key step to developing the drug for psychiatric disorders.
Research Summary of 'Effects of MDMA on attention to positive social cues and pleasantness of affective touch'
Introduction
MDMA (±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) is described as an "empathogen-entactogen" that increases feelings of empathy, trust and interpersonal closeness. Laboratory work in animals and humans has documented prosocial effects that appear distinct from those of other psychostimulants, but the psychological and neurobiological processes that produce these effects remain unclear. The sense of touch, and specifically "affective" touch mediated by C-tactile (CT) afferents on hairy (non-glabrous) skin, is a socially relevant modality that is rated as hedonically pleasant at intermediate stroking velocities (1–10 cm/s). Prior reports link CT-optimal touch to activity in affective tactile brain regions and to neuromodulators influenced by MDMA, such as serotonin and oxytocin, yet human psychopharmacology studies have rarely examined touch as an outcome. Bershad and colleagues designed a placebo-controlled, double-blind, within-subject study to test whether MDMA selectively enhances responses to affective touch and biases visual attention toward positive social cues. They compared two doses of MDMA (0.75 and 1.5 mg/kg) with methamphetamine (MA; 20 mg) and placebo in healthy young adults, measuring subjective pleasantness, facial electromyography (EMG) during experienced and observed touch, and eye-movement indices of attention to emotional faces. The main hypotheses were that MDMA, but not MA, would increase pleasantness and positive psychophysiological responses to CT-optimal touch and would increase attentional bias toward happy facial expressions.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Bershad, A. K., Mayo, L. M., Van Hedger, K., McGlone, F., Walker, S. C., & de Wit, H. (2019). Effects of MDMA on attention to positive social cues and pleasantness of affective touch. Neuropsychopharmacology, 44(10), 1698-1705. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0402-z
References (14)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Bedi, G., Hyman, D., De Wit, H. · Biological Psychiatry (2010)
Bershad, A. K., Weafer, J. J., Kirkpatrick, M. G. et al. · Social Neuroscience (2016)
Kirkpatrick, M. G., Lee, R., Wardle, M. C. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2014)
Preller, K. H., Pokorny, D., Hock, A. et al. · PNAS (2016)
Dumont, G., Sweep, F., van der Steen, R. et al. · Social Neuroscience (2009)
Kirkpatrick, M. G., Francis, S. M., Lee, R. et al. · Psychoneuroendocrinology (2014)
Liechti, M. E., Baumann, C., Gamma, A. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2000)
Mithoefer, M. C., Wagner, M. T., Mithoefer, A. T. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2010)
Danforth, A. L., Grob, C. S., Struble, C. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2018)
Danforth, A. L., Struble, C., Yazar-Klosinski, B. et al. · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (2016)
Show all 14 referencesShow fewer
´dric, C., Hysek, M., Schmid, Y. et al. · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (2013)
Wardle, M. C., De Wit, H. · Psychopharmacology (2014)
Oehen, P., Traber, R., Widmer, V. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2012)
Wagner, M. T., Mithoefer, M. C., Mithoefer, A. T. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
Cited By (15)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Martinez, R. L., Radošić, N., Molla, H. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2025)
Zacher, A., Zimmermann, J., Cole, D. M. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2024)
Luoma, J. B., Allen, L. R., Gold, V. et al. · Psychedelic Medicine (2024)
Bershad, A. K., Hsu, D. T., De Wit, H. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2024)
Zeifman, R. J., Kettner, H., Ross, S. et al. · European Journal of Psychotraumatology (2024)
Ponomarenko, P., Seragnoli, F., Calder, A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2023)
Jones, G. M., Lipson, J., Wang, E. · Scientific Reports (2023)
Vizeli, P., Straumann, I., Duthaler, U. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2022)
Sessa, B., Aday, J. S., Curran, H. V. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2021)
Aday, J. S., Heifets, B. D., Pratscher, S. D. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2021)
Show all 15 papersShow fewer
Regan, A., Margolis, S., De Wit, H. et al. · PLOS ONE (2021)
Holze, F., Caluori, T. V., Vizeli, P. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2021)
Chaliha, D., Mamo, J. C., Albrecht, M. et al. · Current Neuropharmacology (2021)
de Wit, H., Bershad, A. K., Grob, C. S. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2021)
Preller, K. H., Vollenweider, F. X. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2019)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.