This review documents how a small group of UK scientists in the two decades after serotonin's identification developed assays, characterised its synthesis and metabolism, and demonstrated LSD's antagonism and drug effects on brain 5‑HT. Their work established serotonin's putative role in mood regulation and laid the foundations for modern ideas about how antidepressant drugs act.
The vasoconstrictor substance named serotonin was identified as 5‐hydroxytryptamine (5‐HT) by Maurice Rapport in 1949. In 1951, Rapport gave Gaddum samples of 5‐HT substance allowing him to develop a bioassay to both detect and measure the amine. Gaddum and colleagues rapidly identified 5‐HT in brain and showed that lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) antagonized its action in peripheral tissues. Gaddum accordingly postulated that 5‐HT might have a role in mood regulation. This review examines the role of UK scientists in the first 20 years following these major discoveries, discussing their role in developing assays for 5‐HT in the CNS, identifying the enzymes involved in the synthesis and metabolism of 5‐HT and investigating the effect of drugs on brain 5‐HT. It reviews studies on the effects of LSD in humans, including Gaddum's self‐administration experiments. It outlines investigations on the role of 5‐HT in psychiatric disorders, including studies on the effect of antidepressant drugs on the 5‐HT concentration in rodent and human brain, and the attempts to examine 5‐HT biochemistry in the brains of patients with depressive illness. It is clear that a rather small group of both preclinical scientists and psychiatrists in the UK made major advances in our understanding of the role of 5‐HT in the brain, paving the way for much of the knowledge now taken for granted when discussing ways that 5‐HT might be involved in the control of mood and the idea that therapeutic drugs used to alleviate psychiatric illness might alter the function of cerebral 5‐HT.British Journal of Pharmacology(2008)154, 1583–1599; doi:10.1038/bjp.2008.207; published online 26 May 2008
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Catalani, V., Corkery, J. M., Guirguis, A. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2021)
Swanson, L. R. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Nichols, D. E. · ACS Chemical Neuroscience (2018)
Preller, K. H., Vollenweider, F. X. · Behavioral Neurobiology of Psychedelic Drugs (2016)
Nichols, D. E. · Pharmacological Reviews (2016)
Green frames the review as a historical account of early UK work on 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin), emphasising two complementary ways of reconstructing recent science: tracing the published literature and drawing on personal recollection or conversations with the scientists involved. He notes strengths and pitfalls of each approach, arguing that a literature-only history can be sterile while memories can be biased, and therefore blends both sources to give a narrative that highlights people as well as findings. The paper concentrates on the period 1950–1970 and aims to document how a relatively small group of UK investigators established much of the early experimental and clinical neuropharmacology of 5-HT. Specifically, Green intends to review how UK scientists developed assays for 5-HT in the CNS, characterised enzymes of synthesis and metabolism, investigated drug effects on brain 5-HT, studied LSD’s interaction with 5-HT, and explored links between 5-HT and affective disorders. The review is presented as both a record of discovery and an argument that these early UK contributions laid foundations for later ideas about mood regulation and antidepressant action.
This paper is a narrative historical review rather than a systematic review or primary experimental study. Green draws primarily on the published literature from 1950–1970 and supplements that record with personal recollections, conversations with key figures (including Maurice Rapport), and the author’s own involvement in the field. The review selectively highlights UK-based studies while occasionally referencing important non-UK work for context. The author does not report a formal search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or structured quality appraisal; instead the approach is thematic and chronological, organised around major topics (identification and assay of 5-HT, synthesis and metabolism, receptors, pharmacology including LSD, and the emerging clinical literature). Where useful, Green integrates methodological details from original studies (for example bioassay preparations and emerging fluorometric assays) to explain how findings were obtained. He also acknowledges limitations of personal recollection and the potential for selection bias in choosing which studies and people to emphasise.
Characterisation and early identification: The review recounts how the vasoconstrictive substance known as serotonin was chemically identified as 5-HT in 1949 (Maurice Rapport et al.) and how independent lines of work (Page’s group in the USA and Erspamer in Italy) converged on the same indoleamine. Naming conventions (serotonin, enteramine, 5-hydroxytryptamine) and the early synthesis and distribution of the pure compound are described; notably Rapport supplied small samples to UK investigators, including John Gaddum (0.65 mg initially and 25 mg in 1951), which enabled rapid UK experimental work. Measurement of 5-HT in tissues: Green details how early UK research relied heavily on bioassays (rat oestrus uterus, guinea-pig ileum, rabbit ear, and mollusc heart preparations) to detect and quantify 5-HT in tissues, and credits John Gaddum for expertise in bioassay methods. He then describes methodological advances: the Aminco-Bowman fluorescence spectrophotometer (mid-1950s) and chemical derivatisation approaches (ninhydrin and later o-phthaldialdehyde with cysteine) increased sensitivity and throughput, enabling measurements of 5-HT and its metabolite 5-HIAA in brain regions until HPLC replaced these techniques in the late 1970s. Synthesis and metabolic pathways: The review traces elucidation of the biosynthetic and degradative enzymes. Work showed tryptophan is the precursor and that tryptophan hydroxylase and aromatic L-amino-acid decarboxylase are present in brain (Grahame-Smith’s group established brain tryptophan hydroxylase and its presence in synaptosomes). Monoamine oxidase (MAO) had been characterised earlier, and UK groups (notably Merton Sandler’s laboratory) contributed to recognising multiple MAO forms, later classified functionally as MAO A and MAO B. The synthesis of selective MAO A inhibitors (for example clorgyline) assisted functional studies. Aldehyde-metabolising enzymes (aldehyde dehydrogenase/reductase) and pathways producing 5-HIAA or 5-HTOH are also covered. Tryptophan availability and transport: Green summarises work showing tryptophan hydroxylase is rate-limiting and unsaturated with substrate, so changes in free plasma tryptophan alter brain 5-HT synthesis. He notes UK contributions (Curzon, Grahame-Smith, Parfitt) to understanding synaptosomal uptake and competition between large neutral amino acids, although much of the detailed mechanistic work on diet–insulin effects was published later in the early 1970s. Control of synthesis and turnover: The review recounts development of the turnover concept (largely from US groups) and experiments showing that raising precursor plus inhibiting MAO produced characteristic behavioural syndromes (the so-called serotonin syndrome). Parke Davis work establishing the 5-HTP-induced head-twitch model is noted, including its pharmacological blockade by LSD and other 5-HT antagonists, foreshadowing receptor-specific interpretations made later. Platelets, uptake and relevance to brain: Platelet studies are reviewed as an accessible model of uptake and storage: early UK and international work showed platelets concentrate 5-HT via an active high-affinity uptake mechanism, that reserpine depletes platelet 5-HT, and that platelet assays were used to study drug effects (e.g. tricyclics inhibiting uptake). These platelet findings preceded and paralleled recognition of a brain high-affinity uptake system. Receptor heterogeneity and LSD pharmacology: Gaddum’s early bioassay studies proposed multiple receptor types (initially labelled D and M), a prescient proposal later mapped onto central subtypes (D ≈ 5-HT2, M ≈ 5-HT3). Crucially, Gaddum and colleagues showed LSD antagonised 5-HT responses in peripheral bioassays and suggested this might underlie LSD’s psychoactive effects. The review recounts extensive early human experimentation with LSD in volunteers and patients: Gaddum’s own self-administration experiments are described (he took 30 mg, then 40 mg, later 85–86 mg on occasions), and multiple UK groups studied EEG changes, behavioural effects and adverse responses, including severe adverse events in some patients and volunteers. Thermoregulation and other physiological roles: Feldberg and collaborators showed intraventricular 5-HT altered body temperature (species-dependent effects), implicating hypothalamic sites; subsequent UK and industry studies reported both hyperthermic and hypothermic responses in different species. 5-HT, antidepressants and psychiatric disorder: Green reviews how clinical observations with reserpine (depleting stored amines) and iproniazid (an MAO inhibitor) stimulated hypotheses linking monoamines to mood. Preclinical and clinical studies of tricyclic antidepressants and MAO inhibitors showed effects on monoamine concentrations, uptake and MAO activity. Coppen’s clinical work (tranylcypromine with tryptophan augmentation, and tryptophan alone) provided early human data suggesting enhancement of 5-HT could have antidepressant effects. Post-mortem and CSF studies are reviewed: early reports of decreased 5-HT or 5-HIAA in suicides or CSF of depressed patients were inconsistent; Edinburgh groups measured CSF 5-HIAA and performed ventricular–lumbar comparisons but later concerns emerged about lumbar CSF origin and confounding by activity level. The monoamine hypothesis and UK contribution: The cumulative UK and international data of the 1950s–1960s coalesced into the monoamine hypothesis of affective disorder — the idea that reduced monoamine concentration or function contributes to depression and that antidepressants act via monoaminergic mechanisms. Green stresses the heuristic value of this hypothesis while acknowledging that the evidence did not yield a single encompassing etiological theory and that further receptor and systems-level work was needed.
Green interprets the reviewed material as showing that a relatively small, closely interacting group of UK scientists, centred in Edinburgh and London, made disproportionately large contributions to the formative neuropharmacology of 5-HT during 1950–1970. He attributes rapid progress to early access to chemically synthesised 5-HT, technical advances in assay methods, inventive use of bioassays, and the close translation between animal studies and clinical investigation. The author emphasises John Gaddum’s central role in detecting cerebral 5-HT and in recognising LSD’s antagonism of 5-HT actions, which stimulated hypotheses about 5-HT and mood. The paper places UK work in its international context, acknowledging major contemporaneous contributions from groups in the USA (NIH/NHI) and Sweden (Karolinska/Gothenburg) and noting that some mechanistic advances (for example turnover measurements and dietary regulation of tryptophan transport) had important non-UK origins. Green also flags methodological and interpretative limitations of the early literature: many clinical studies lacked randomisation or blinding, early human experiments sometimes exposed volunteers and patients to substantial risk, post-mortem and CSF findings were inconsistent and subject to confounds (age, sampling/post-mortem delay, anatomical origin of lumbar CSF), and reliance on personal recollection can introduce bias in historical synthesis. In terms of implications, the author argues that these early discoveries provided the empirical basis for later receptor-subtype work and for the development of antidepressant pharmacotherapy. He stresses the heuristic value of the monoamine hypothesis while conceding that it does not fully explain affective disorders. Finally, Green calls for awareness of the historical trajectory of the field—both to avoid redundant rediscovery and to appreciate how method and serendipity combined under systematic enquiry to produce progress — echoing Gaddum’s view that many “accidental” discoveries arose only because investigators were pursuing a systematic research programme.
Green concludes that UK investigators, particularly a core group in Edinburgh supplemented by collaborators in London, drove many of the early advances in 5-HT neuropharmacology between 1950 and 1970. He argues that their methodological innovations, rapid translation between animal and human work, and conceptual leaps (for example linking LSD’s pharmacology to 5-HT and proposing receptor heterogeneity) established much of the foundation for subsequent research and for antidepressant therapy. While acknowledging the role of serendipity, he emphasises that such discoveries depended on systematic experimental work and available techniques. The review closes by underscoring the importance of remembering this history and credits the early researchers for paving the way to later receptor and clinical developments.
The history of recent science can be evaluated in two ways, not necessarily exclusively. One approach examines the published literature, primarily journals, to give an accurate time line of the primacy of presentation of new knowledge to the world, although this does not always indicate primacy of discovery. Consequently, the information gained does not always give a clear idea of how the investigator became involved in a specific research project or the way in which ideas developed. The other approach is to talk to the scientists involved in the research, or to colleagues or friends of those involved in the research, to obtain their personal views of events, people and priority. This latter approach has been used recently in the area of psychopharmacologyand is of course the basis of many personal reviews published in major journals. However, such reviews can be biased by personal memory and even, it has to be said, personal prejudice. Goodfield, a scientific historian, has commented that 'however charming the personal recollections of scientists after retirement might be, by then they are often quite unreliable historically'. Mark Twain recognized this problem in a more general way, stating that 'the older I get the more vivid is my recollection of things that never happened'. However, without some insight into the personalities and professional lives of the scientists involved in the original investigations, a history based on published work alone can become a very dry affair. Therefore, although I am going to focus on the publications of UK scientists involved in the early neuropharmacology research on 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), I hope also to give a flavour of some of the people involved. Obviously, research on aspects of 5-HT biochemistry and function outside the brain markedly influenced research on CNS pharmacology, and this is also detailed where relevant. Why did I want to examine this area of science history? Primarily, I think, because of being closely involved with the Serotonin Club since its formation in 1987, which resulted in my meeting Maurice Rapport, the man who identified the vasoactive substance circulating in blood and already named serotonin as being 5-HT. To meet and talk at length to this distinguished scientist, who discovered the neurotransmitter that I have spent much of my professional life investigating, was a true privilege and made me realize that I had started studying the pharmacology of cerebral 5-HT less than 15 years after it was first identified in the brain (see later). Shortly after this meeting I was asked to write a review of the neuropharmacology of 5-HT for the special issue of the British Journal of Pharmacology, which celebrated 75 years of the British Pharmacological Society. This task made me also appreciate what a major role UK scientists had played in the early days of 5-HT research and made me want to examine this in more detail, as most of the key players active in this explosive period of neuropharmacology and psychopharmacology research on 5-HT have now retired. The enthusiasm of most active researchers naturally (and rightly) rests on current research findings, but it would be a tragedy if we forgot the early work that led to current ideas. I have sometimes observed that findings are erroneously presented as novel because the investigators (and presumably also the editors) were unaware of a much earlier paper reporting similar or even near identical data. I therefore firmly believe that we should all be aware of the history of our particular branch of science, so that we do not 'reinvent the wheel'. Nevertheless, I was amused to read recently a comment by Professor Gerald Curzon (Figure), my PhD supervisor and the man who initiated my lifetime interest in 5-HT, who stated: 'It is a pity that scientists tend to get interested in the history of their subject only as they approach retirement', as this fits me only too well. The period I have limited myself to is 1950-1970. This is a period referred to byin their short article on the history of 5-HT research as 'the renaissance', and for good reasons. Although it had been known for nearly a century that a vasoconstrictive compound existed in blood, this compound was only identified as being 5-HT in 1949. From then until 1970, papers on this compound, reporting major new findings, appeared at a dizzy rate. After 1970 research became rather quieter, until the very end of the decade when receptor subtypes started to be identified and characterized, and research again entered a much more active phase (see. The objective of the current exercise was not to indulge in nationalistic boasting. Science advances by developing work and ideas produced by scientists worldwide and it is often difficult to ascribe a finding as being the results of the effort of any one scientist or group. All that I desire is to show how active UK scientists were in these early years, producing so much of the neuropsychopharmacology knowledge we now take for granted. To avoid producing a daunting list of references, I have sometimes named non-UK investigators, but not provided a full journal citation for the information being discussed. However, I have tried to detail all the major UK-based studies. I hope overseas readers will forgive me for doing this. It is particularly hard on researchers from the USA and Sweden; both countries produced so many major discoveries in the period under discussion. Indeed, I remain astounded at the amount of novel work on 5-HT metabolism and pharmacology that poured out from the National Heart Institute (NHI), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) complex in Bethesda, MD, USA, and on neuroanatomy and neuropharmacology from the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm and the Department of Pharmacology at Gothenburg University in Sweden in the period under review.
The fact that defibrinogenated blood increased vascular tone in perfused dog muscle was first reported byalso quoted a paper by LT Stevens and FS Lee, who in 1884 reported the existence of a vasoconstrictive substance in clotted blood. This finding was supported by the later work of TG Brodie, the Director of the combined laboratories of the Royal College of Physicians and Royal College of Surgeons in London, who observed that preventing blood from clotting, by adding sodium citrate, also prevented the action of the vasoconstrictive substance. Subsequent attempts were made to identify the substance further by examining whether it was heat stable and dialysable, but many of the data were conflicting and have been reviewed in detail elsewhere. The key period for its final identification occurred between 1945 and 1950. Irvine H Page had been researching the problem of hypertension in nephritic patients since 1931 and had assumed that a humoral substance was responsible. The vasoconstrictive substance appearing in clotted blood interfered with the investigation of other humoral substances involved in hypertension (the primary substance finally being identified as angiotensin). When he moved to the Cleveland Clinic in 1945 as Research Director, he continued these investigations with Arda A Green, a physical biochemist, and Maurice M Rapport who had recently completed his PhD in organic chemistry at Cal Tech. This trio then continued to work on the characterization problem of the vasoconstrictive substance towards its final solution. However, it was Maurice Rapport alone who finally identified the substance they had isolated as the indolealkylamine 5-HT. The story of this work has been detailed elsewhere by bothand, although it is notable that Page in his 1957 review avoided giving full credit to Rapport for the final identification; particularly as identification can only be considered absolute when the compound has been synthesized and its activity compared with the isolated substance. The work on serotonin in the USA was not the only major investigation proceeding on the compound that finally proved to be 5-HT. Vittorio Erspamer and his colleagues had been working in Italy from the early 1930s on a substance present in enterochromaffin cells of the gastric mucosa of mammals and salivary glands of octopuses. This substance was identified as an indole in 1946. Erspamer named it enteramine and produced prodigious amounts of information on its distribution in many different tissues (see. The final confirmation that enteramine was 5-HT was published by. It is fascinating that the groups of Page and Erspamer worked independently and in ignorance of each other's work until both serotonin and enteramine had been identified as 5-HT. So why were the names serotonin and enteramine chosen? It was Arthur C Corcoran, a colleague of Page, who coined the name serotonin for the vasoconstricting substance, as this describes one of its functions in blood. Erspamer suggested the name enteramine, as this encompasses both the location of 5-HT in the gut and his realization that the substance was an amine. Recognizing the limitations of both names,suggested that both should be discarded. Although recognizing the chemical logic of the name enteramine, he noted that it could not be applied to all known locations, whereas serotonin was inaccurate in terms of both specificity of location and action. Bacq therefore suggested that 5-hydroxytryptamine should be the preferred name (abbreviated to 5-HT). Although this proposal was accepted immediately by, it is clear that Page remained unhappy about this, as many years later he mentioned that he had chided Gaddum for using 5-HT, saying that '5-HTogenic was an abomination'. What has happened is that serotonin is still generally used for 5-HT in all its functional guises in the USA, although 5-HT is primarily used in the UK, and both terms are used interchangeably elsewhere. Serotonin is almost exclusively used by the popular press in its many articles about the brain, drugs and mood. Identification of the vasoconstrictive substance as the chemical substance 5-HT byallowed him to persuade Ed Maynert, a chemist in the Pharmacology Department at Columbia University, New York, to synthesize 5-HT, to confirm the identification of the isolated substance. He was then able to convince chemists at both Upjohn and Abbott to devise methods for synthesizing 5-HT. This synthesis allowed both companies to distribute 5-HT to interested investigators, which doubtless produced the explosive growth in publications on the amine. Hans Heller, Professor of Pharmacology at Bristol University, asked Rapport for a sample of 5-HT for his studies in the kidney and received a 1 mg sample from him in April 1950. Significantly, Maurice Rapport also supplied a small sample (0.65 mg) to John (subsequently Sir John) Gaddum (Figure) when they initially met in the USA and subsequently sent him a much larger sample (25 mg) in 1951 to allow him to continue his studies (Figure).
Comparison of the characteristics of the unknown active substance in tissues with the newly available pure 5-HT substance allowed identification of 5-HT in tissues and organs and also the elimination of various other active compounds such as histamine from further consideration. All such early work relied on bioassay, a staple pharmacological tool. This was a technique used by John Gaddum in some of his earliest work and one that he always had a significant interest in, commenting in 1964: 'the pharmacologist has been the 'jack of all trades' borrowing from physiology, biochemistry, pathology, microbiology and statistics-but he has developed one technique on his own and that is bioassay'. His expertise with this technique resulted in several major discoveries that proved crucial for subsequent 5-HT neuropharmacology research, and the value of bioassay in early research on 5-HT cannot be overestimated. In a key study,investigated the action of 5-HT on a range of tissues before examining the effects of putative antagonists. 5-HT caused contractions of the uterus, duodenum and colon of rats, the uterus, duodenum and jejunum of rabbits, and the uterus, duodenum, jejunum and ileum of guinea pigs, and also caused vasoconstriction of the perfused rabbit ear. The rat oestrus uterus technique used by Gaddum had originally been used by Erspamer in his early studies, and the guinea pig ileum had also previously been used by bothand Rocha e Silva et al.. The ileum preparation was also used byin their seminal paper on tryptamine receptor subtypes, which I discuss later.had used the rabbit ear preparation in their earliest studies on the identification of the vasoconstrictive substance, because it was already being used by Arda Green (see, and it is interesting to note that the preparation had originally been developed bywhen Gaddum was at University College, London. JH Burn had said of this method: 'every young pharmacologist should learn to use this preparation as part of his training' (see. John (later Sir John) Vane also developed a novel bioassay technique for assaying 5-HT, which used a strip of rat fundus, although he later commented that Brendan Whittle had subsequently told him it was actually the corpus, not the fundus. However, this preparation became generally known as the rat stomach strip and was also used to examine the potency of various tryptamine analogues. It is important in these days of modern analytical techniques not to underestimate the power of bioassay as an analytical tool. Extract of tissue containing low nanogram amounts of 5-HT could be reliably measured with the rat uterus method andclaimed that the stomach strip could respond to 1 ng of 5-HT. The collaboration of Betty Twarog with Page in Cleveland resulted in a very different type of bioassay. Twarog was very interested in invertebrate pharmacology (Whitaker-Azmitia, 1999) and she consequently used the isolated heart of the mollusc Venus mercenaria as her bioassay tissue. It was this technique that allowed identification of 5-HT in mammalian brain. Gaddum was also interested in mollusc preparations, and together with Paasonen, a Finnish visitor to his laboratory in Edinburgh, he examined various mollusc heart preparations for their suitability in estimating 5-HT. The study required Paasonen to spend some time at the Gatty Marine Laboratories at St Andrews in Scotland, and despite the fact that they reported on the suitability of the bivalve Spisula solida heart, because 'the animal is hardy and its heart beats constantly for several days in isolation', the approach did not supersede the use of mammalian tissues in Edinburgh, judging by later published studies. Although bioassay is very sensitive and allows identification of the amine in tissue extracts, and indeed quantitative measurement of tissue 5-HT, it is nevertheless a timeconsuming technique that is not amenable to the fast throughput of samples required when examining the effects of drugs on cerebral 5-HT content, a problem that Gaddum was happy to acknowledge, stating of bioassays: 'Their main disadvantages are that they are not very accurate and comparatively slow; it is generally not possible to make more than about ten estimates in one day'. This problem of speed was answered with a major methodological leap forward at the NIH in Bethesda, MD, USA. At the NIH there was a formidable group of scientists in the National Heart Institute, including Bernard B Brodie, Sidney Udenfriend, Parkhurst Shore, Herbert Weissbach, Albert Sjoerdsma, Erminio Costa, Julius Axelrod, and many others, including both domestic and international visiting scientists, such as Arvid Carlsson, Alfred Pletscher, Leslie Iversen and Solomon Snyder, all of whom would make a major impact on our understanding of monoamine pharmacology. In 1955, Robert Bowman from that division, working with the American Instrument Company, developed a fluorescence spectrophotometer (the Aminco-Bowman), which could activate (induce) and measure emitted fluorescence over a wide spectral range. This was then used to develop a method for analysing 5-HT extracted from brain tissue. This method involved measuring the native fluorescence of 5-HT in strong acid, and it was used extensively untilmodified the method by reacting the 5-HT with ninhydrin to produce a fluorophore, thereby increasing sensitivity considerably. However, it is worth noting that this advance was based on work performed many years earlier at the Middlesex Hospital, London, by Jepson and Stevens. These researchers had reported that ninhydrin produced a specific highly fluorescent derivative with 5-HT, which could be used to identify the amine when used in conjunction with paper chromatography. In the late 1960s,reported an even more sensitive method that involved reacting 5-HT with o-phthaldialdehyde in strong acid. I tried this method when undertaking my PhD with Gerald Curzon, but we were disappointed with its sensitivity. However, Korf in Holland then published a method for measuring 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA) in urine, using o-phthaldialdehyde, and showed that adding cysteine enhanced the sensitivity of the assay. Curzon therefore asked me to try the 5-HT assay again, but with the addition of cysteine. He also suggested that the extraction of 5-HT should leave the metabolite 5-HIAA in the aqueous phase and that this could therefore also be extracted and reacted with o-phthaldialdehyde, thereby allowing both 5-HT and its metabolite 5-HIAA to be measured in the same tissue sample. We found that this method did allow these two indoles to be measured in discrete regions of a single rat brain. This had not previously been possible using the ninhydrin method, and we duly published the work as a short paper. We were somewhat surprised by the enthusiasm with which the method was adopted, and it was used by others extensively over the next decade, until HPLC replaced it in the late 1970s. The use of fluorescence to quantify the major 5-HT metabolite also provided another advance over bioassay, as the metabolite cannot be measured by that technique. Curzon had also been responsible for some key early work on the measurement of 5-HIAA, albeit not in cerebral tissue, when he developed a paper chromatography method for its detection in urine. He then went on, with others, to examine urinary 5-HIAA excretion in patients with the carcinoid syndrome.
UK scientists can lay claim to having been major players in the elucidation of the pathways of 5-HT synthesis and metabolism, starting with the fact that tryptophan, the amino-acid precursor of 5-HT, was discovered by Sir Frederick Gowland Hopkins, the first Professor of Biochemistry at the University of Cambridge (see. The likelihood that 5-HT was formed from tryptophan, by hydroxylation followed by decarboxylation was first proposed and partially demonstrated at the National Heart Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA, in a series of papers in J Am Chem Soc in 1953 (see. The race was then on to characterize fully the enzymes involved. Tryptophan hydroxylasedemonstrated the existence of the hydroxylation step by administering [ 14 C]tryptophan orally to toads for 5 days and extracting their venom glands on day 7. Labelled 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) was then identified. Other studies in this paper showed conversion in mammals of labelled tryptophan to 5-HT and 5-HIAA, thereby establishing the probable chain of biochemical events. However, full identification of the hydroxylase enzyme took many more years, during which time there was discussion as to whether tryptophan was hydroxylated by a specific tryptophan hydroxylase enzyme or whether phenylalanine hydroxylase was utilized, as it is in the liver. The first absolute identification of the hydroxylase enzyme in brain was made by David Grahame-Smith (Figure), working at St Mary's Hospital, London. This preliminary paper was followed by a report of the full characterization of the enzyme. It is noteworthy that the latter paper also demonstrated the presence of the enzyme in synaptosomes, the pinched-off presynaptic nerve endings first prepared from brain homogenates byat the Agricultural Research Council Laboratories at Babraham in Cambridge. Synaptosomes had been shown to contain both 5-HTand 5-HTP decarboxylase (Rodriguez de Lores Arnaiz and de. This allowed Grahame-Smith to conclude correctly that brain 5-HT was formed by biosynthesis from tryptophan at the nerve ending and that this formation was sufficient for its needs. The availability of a specific inhibitor for tryptophan hydroxylase, namely para-chlorophenylalanine, from the Pfizer Laboratories in the USA, markedly assisted subsequent studies on 5-HT biosynthesis, although the data produced initially caused considerable unease in those working on the function of 5-HT in the brain, as para-chlorophenylalanine produced a profound loss in rodent cerebral 5-HT content with little overt change in behaviour. It took a while before the idea could be confirmed that para-chlorophenylalanine could produce a major loss of 5-HT in the brain without also altering the small functional pool of the amine (see.
The synthesis of 5-HTP byallowed Udenfriend and colleagues both to purify and to characterize the enzyme not long after the initial identification of 5-HT. Gaddum was also working in this area, undertaking a study with Giarman while he was in Edinburgh on leave of absence from the Pharmacology Department at Yale University. They reported the presence of decarboxylase activity not only in peripheral tissues but also in the brain, and they concluded that the fact that there was activity in the CNS was 'supporting the theory that 5-HT plays a physiological role [in the brain]'.
In 1910, researchers at the Wellcome Laboratories (under the then Director Sir Henry Dale) observed that cats perfused with tryptamine produced indole acetic acid. The characterization of the enzyme responsible for this step was performed by a graduate student, Mary Hare (Bernheim), in the Cambridge laboratory of Sir Frederick Gowland Hopkins. A few years later, Hermann (Hugh) Blaschko (Figure) and colleagues showed that this enzyme also oxidized adrenaline, and in the same year a paper from the Biochemical Laboratory at the Cardiff City Mental Hospital demonstrated that this enzyme, which we now call monoamine oxidase (MAO) was present in the brain. With all this knowledge available, even before the discovery of 5-HT, it is not surprising that MAO was rapidly acknowledged and confirmed as being the mechanism by which the amine was degraded to the aldehyde. Recognition that MAO existed in multiple forms came in the late 1960s with work in the laboratory of Merton Sandler (Figure) in London. The group identified multiple enzyme forms in both ratand human brains, and by the early 1970s it was accepted that there were clearly two functional forms with differing substrate specificities (types A and B, generally now referred to as MAO A and MAO B ). Type A has tyramine and 5-HT as its major substrates, whereas type B oxidizes dopamine well but 5-HT poorly. However, it was subsequently shown that achieving a functional increase in cerebral 5-HT function in vivo by selective inhibition of MAO A was problematic. These discoveries were markedly assisted by synthesis of the selective MAO A inhibitor clorgyline at the May and Baker laboratories at Dagenham, Essex. Some of this work has recently been reviewed elsewhere.
The 5-hydroxyindoleacetaldehyde that is produced by the action of MAO on 5-HT is short-lived and cannot normally be detected in the brain, unless a trapping agent is used. In the liver, the aldehyde can then be metabolized to either the acid, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) or the alcohol, 5-hydroxytryptophol (5-HTOH). In humans, administration of ethanol shifts metabolism towards 5-HTOH. Donald Eccleston and colleagues at the Medical Research Council (MRC) Brain Metabolism Unit in Edinburgh demonstrated that both human and rat brains could form 5-HTOH, although a subsequent study showed that ethanol did not shift aldehyde formation towards 5-HTOH in the brain. Shortly thereafter, aldehyde dehydrogenase was purified from pig brain and its properties were studied in the Biochemistry Department of Cambridge University.
Tryptophan hydroxylase is the rate-limiting enzyme for the formation of 5-HT in the brain and is unsaturated with its substrate. This means that any increase in brain tryptophan content will increase the rate of 5-HT synthesis. This was demonstrated by administering a diet rich in tryptophan or, as demonstrated in Edinburgh, by intraperitoneal injection of tryptophan. Although it was first reported in 1958 that most plasma tryptophan is protein bound (and thus not available for transport into the brain), the full import of this fact was not realized for at least another 10 years. Although the work of Curzon in London, Gessa in Italy and Wurtman in the USA, was crucial in clarifying the ways that alterations in food availability, carbohydrates and free fatty acids also altered tryptophan availability for the brain, most of this work was performed in the early to mid-1970s and so will not be considered further here. However, Curzon was developing some of his ideas on the role of tryptophan availability on cerebral 5-HT concentration in the mid-1960s, and this work formed the basis of my PhD studies with him. There was then much interest in the possible role of corticosteroids in depression and as they were known to induce the main enzyme metabolizing tryptophan, liver tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (then called tryptophan pyrrolase), he suggested I should see if hydrocortisone, by depleting tryptophan, would also decrease brain 5-HT. Hydrocortisone produced exactly that effect in rats, and we subsequently performed other studies using stress as the corticosteroid inducer, with similar consequences. These studies resulted in a hypothesis that linked steroids, tryptophan pyrrolase, tryptophan availability, brain 5-HT concentration and depression. A very similar hypothesis was proposed by two scientists in Russia at much the same time, although they had apparently reached their proposal without any direct experimental work and without seeing any of our supporting experimental work (at least according to their reference list). Later work we performed suggested that the depletion of cerebral 5-HT content might be due, at least in part, to the increase in metabolites formed down the tryptophan pyrrolase pathway (kynurenine, 3-OH kynurenine), as these compounds are amino acids and compete with tryptophan for entry into cerebral tissues. Again, parallel independent studies were being published, supporting the idea that certain amino acids compete with tryptophan for transport into synaptosomes (Grahame-Smith and Parfitt, 1970).
Although studies that clarified the role of free versus bound tryptophan in the blood, the effect of changes in the concentrations of large neutral amino acids in plasma and the roles of carbohydrates and insulin on tryptophan transport into the CNS were generally not published until the early 1970s, the work of Grahame-Smith and Parfitt (1970) did point the way by defining how tryptophan entered synaptosomes. These studies showed not only that there was competition for the transport of tryptophan by the neutral amino acids (leucine, tyrosine, methionine and phenylalanine) but also that exchange diffusion occurred. Overall, these findings on the role of free (unbound) tryptophan in blood and the involvement of competing amino acids, insulin and carbohydrates pointed the way to an understanding as to how tryptophan availability for the brain could be altered in vivo and thus alter 5-HT synthesis. Nevertheless, the work of Grahame-Smith and others cast doubt on tryptophan availability as being a crucial determinant in the control of 5-HT function as is now discussed.
The whole concept of measuring synthesis and turnover was due primarily to Ermino Costa, Norton Neff and others in the USA, and UK science had little involvement with it. However, what can be shown is how the idea of turnover (a term much abused by many who do not fully understand it) helped provoke other new ideas on the importance of synthesis and turnover in terms of controlling the functional activity of 5-HT in the brain. While the main work was published after 1970, the ideas were being developed in the late 1960s, and were so influential to further 5-HT research that I shall mention them here.showed that although a tryptophan load markedly increased cerebral 5-HT synthesis rate and an MAO inhibitor increased the cerebral 5-HT concentration 2-3 times, animals treated with either drug alone showed few overt behavioural changes. However, administration of an MAO inhibitor together with tryptophan resulted in a complex behavioural syndrome, often called the 'serotonin syndrome', with several clear behaviours, including head weaving and reciprocal forepaw treading. From these observations he deduced that 5-HT function was probably controlled, at least in part, by intracellular metabolism of 5-HT by MAO. Crucially, he proposed that this indicated that measuring the cerebral 5-HT concentration or 5-HT synthesis rate was not sufficient to deduce whether function is altered. He also realized that we now had a method for examining how psychoactive drugs alter 5-HT function, by examining the effect of drugs on the syndrome. This led to a series of investigations on psychoactive drugs in his laboratory in Oxford in the 1970s and beyond. The paper that suggested to Grahame-Smith that raising cerebral 5-HT function would lead to a series of behavioural changes in rats was that of, who had shown that administration of tryptophan or 5-HTP with an MAO inhibitor increased the concentration of both 5-HT and tryptamine in the brain and also led to a series of complex behavioural changes. They also noted that the severity of the behaviour did not correlate with the increase in brain amine concentration. This paper had also intrigued a group of scientists working at the Parke Davis Laboratories in Hounslow. They examined whether distinct behavioural changes could also be induced in mice by raising cerebral 5-HT content. This was achieved by administering high doses of the precursor 5-HTP. In an elegant and comprehensive study, they showed that 5-HTP injection produced a characteristic head twitch behaviour, which increased dose-dependently. They also showed that the number of twitches was related to the cerebral 5-HT content and that the response was blocked by a decarboxylase inhibitor. They were able to antagonize the response with drugs recognized as 5-HT antagonists, such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), cyproheptadine and methysergide, and concluded that the behavioural response 'can be used to study potentiators and antagonists of 5-HT in vivo'. However, the importance of this work and its implications were not really recognized at the time, and the model was little used for this purpose for many years afterwards. It was perhaps only when it was realized that the head twitch was a 5-HT 2 receptor-mediated response that the model became fully exploited.
Although superficially it might seem odd to have a section devoted to platelet 5-HT in a review of neuropharmacology, the fact that the platelet takes up and stores 5-HT gives an analogy to the 5-HT nerve ending (with the immediate and major proviso that platelets do not synthesize the amine). The platelet has therefore been used extensively in studies on 5-HT, as I shall review later. The identification of the vasoconstrictive substance in blood as 5-HT naturally led to studies examining whether the substance was present in plasma or in specific organelles, a question that, when previously addressed, had led to conflicting answers (see. However, Reid in Melbourne, Australia, was another scientist who received an early sample of pure 5-HT from Rapport, which assisted him in showing that essentially all the amine found in blood was present in the platelet. Subsequent studies in Brodie's laboratory at the NIH and Stacey's laboratory at St Thomas's Hospital in Londonshowed that reserpine depleted platelet 5-HT, and, working at the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) at Mill Hill in London, reported that dog platelets would accumulate 5-HT. This was confirmed in human platelets the next year bywho stated that 5-HT was 'taken up' by platelets by an 'active concentrating mechanism' against the concentration gradient. Other UK scientists subsequently reported that platelets had a highaffinity uptake system. Crucially, this was several years before it was demonstrated that the brain possessed a high-affinity uptake system. However, it is interesting to note that the concept that amines are taken up and stored in tissues had first been proposed about 30 years earlier by JH Burn, another distinguished UK pharmacologist, who investigated ephedrine and tyramine while working in London at the pharmacological laboratories of the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.
We are now familiar with the concept that 5-HT has multiple receptor subtypes. However, relatively few people realize that the proposal that 5-HT could act on more than one receptor type was first made byin their studies on the effect of 5-HT on various mammalian tissues. The definitive investigation on receptor subtypes followed 3 years later). Gaddum's classification was that of D and M receptors, names that he chose because the receptors were blocked by dibenzyline and morphine, respectively. However, this classification was considered to be applicable only to peripheral receptors, and it was not until the mid-1970s that 5-HT receptor subtypes were identified and characterized in CNS tissue (see. However, the correctness of Gaddum's original work is exemplified by the fact that the D receptor was finally categorized as the 5-HT 2 receptor and the M receptor as the 5-HT 3 site.
The realization that serotonin was not unique to blood, nor enteramine to the gut, coupled with the ability to identify 5-HT and measure its concentration by bioassay, resulted in substantial efforts by several groups to examine extracts from a multitude of tissues. It is clear that the existence of 5-HT in the brain was discovered independently, and at much the same time, by Twarog and Page in Cleveland, OH and by Gaddum and colleagues in Edinburgh. Gaddum presented the results orally to a meeting of the British Pharmacological Society in July 1952 (the full paper appearing 2 years later:, and the full paper ofwas submitted in June of that year. The Edinburgh group not only identified the amine in the brain but also published data on its regional distribution in dog brain, using bioassay preparations involving the rat uterusand S. solida mollusc. Both studies showed a high concentration of 5-HT in caudate and hypothalamus and a low concentration in cerebellum.also reported on the aminedepleting effect of reserpine in dog brain.
The first work to suggest that a tryptaminergic compound could have CNS-stimulatory effects was performed at the Wellcome Laboratories in Herne Hill, London, almost a century ago. Laidlaw examined 'the amine corresponding to the amino acid tryptophane [sic]' and observed that the effect of injection of indolethylamine (tryptamine) in cats was that of brief behavioural excitation. Identification of 5-HT in the brain byin Edinburgh was accompanied by the major discovery that LSD had an antagonistic action on the effect of 5-HT in both the rat uterus bioassay system (Figure) and in the rabbit ear preparation (Figure). It is not surprising that Gaddum investigated ergot compounds in his preparations. He had trained under Sir Henry Dale at the National Institute for Medical Research, and Dale had been interested in ergot compounds from his days at the Wellcome Laboratories at Herne Hill near London (where Gaddum's career had begun when he worked with JW Trevan). While at the Wellcome Laboratories Dale had investigated the actions of ergot, and Laidlaw, in the same laboratories, had even demonstrated that ergotoxin antagonized the action of tryptamine. Gaddum had also extended the finding of Heymans in 1932 that ergotamine would antagonize the vasoconstrictor substance found in defibrinogenated blood by observing that dihydroergotamine had the same effect when using the rabbit ear preparation. Gaddum found that LSD was the most potent of the eight ergots examined for their ability to antagonize 5-HT in the rat uterus and rabbit ear preparations. A later study by these two scientists, in collaboration with others from Glaxo Laboratories in Greenford, Middlesex, examined a range of indole-containing compounds and confirmed, using pA 2 calculations, that LSD was the most potent compound available and also that its effects became insurmountable. LSD was by then also known to produce clear psychedelic effects. These had originally been experienced by the medicinal chemist Albert Hofmann, who had first synthesized the compound in the Sandoz laboratories in Basel (see. For his own description of the effects of ingesting LSD, see. The paper reporting on these effects was FigureThe effect of 5-HT (HT; 16 mg L À1 ), oxytocin (OX; 30 mg L À1 ) on a rat uterus preparation in a 3 mL bath and the action of various concentrations of LSD. Reproduced from, with permission of the British Pharmacological Society and Nature Publishing Group. first published by, and Gaddum and colleaguesspecifically concluded that the psychoactive effects of LSD could be due to an action on 5-HT in the brain. Similar ideas were being developed simultaneously on the other side of the Atlantic by, who investigated the antagonistic action of various indolecontaining compounds using in vitro tissue preparations, and subsequently pointed out that some mood-altering ergot compounds, including LSD, 'contained' within their structure the 5-HT structure (Figure). They referred to LSD as being a 'serotonin antimetabolite' and also proposed that antagonism of 5-HT might be the reason that such compounds were what came to be called psychotomimetic.used the new approach of intraventricular injection of drugs in conscious cats, a method that had recently been developed by, to investigate the effects of LSD. Although low intraventricular doses of LSD (200 mg) appeared to have little effect on behaviour, it was found that when a higher dose (800 mg) was given cats that had been quiet and friendly 'became for a time unreasonable and intolerant', hissed fiercely and bared their teeth. The non-hallucinogen brom-LSD had no effect. However, buried in this report of a major preclinical study is a quite amazing section, simply subheaded 'methylamphetamine and LSD'. This states that a few observations were made in man and goes on to say: 'one of us took, on four occasions [my italics], 36-86 mg LSD by the mouth and experienced some of the known effects of this drug, such as a feeling of irresponsibility and euphoria, increased awareness of shapes and colours, shimmering of peripheral vision, and a dreamy feeling that sensations did not represent real objects'. Which of these two distinguished pharmacologists took the drug? No clue is given. However, perusal of his laboratory notebook in the archives of the Royal Society reveals that it was in fact Gaddum who took the hallucinogen. RB (Dick) Barlow, who later joined the Edinburgh department, told me that he had heard that Marthe Vogt (Figure) had been very worried about what ensued. The initial self-ingestion of LSD occurred on Good Friday, 3 April 1953, when Gaddum took 30 mg. Few mental changes occurred, other than his reporting that 'everything looks a little blue, like a picture of a ghost by Stanley Spencer'. He therefore took a further dose of 40 mg on Saturday 4 April, when he also took methedrine (methamphetamine; 5 mg) to FigureThe effect of 5-HT (HT) and adrenaline (AD) in the rabbit ear preparation. LSD (10 mg L À1 ) specifically inhibited the response to 5-HT. Reproduced from, with permission of the British Pharmacological Society and Nature Publishing Group. FigureThe structure of LSD compared with that of 5-HT. observe whether the amine oxidase-inhibitory action of the amphetamine might increase cerebral 5-HT and thereby antagonize the effect of the LSD. He concluded that methedrine had the effect of making him feel more normal. Two further experiments were performed on 9 May and 1 June, using much higher doses (85 and 86 mg, respectively) and with a variety of tests, including repeating numbers, drawing a geometric shape, threading a needle, touching his nose with the finger and dictating passages of a book. In the last study, he also took methedrine (10 mg). It is clear that the mood-altering effects of LSD were much more profound than in the initial studies, with changes in body ideation, colour changes, feelings of irresponsibility and loss of concentration (Figure). The methedrine appeared to diminish some of the intoxicant effects of LSD but not the subjective effects. These results were reported only very briefly by. This clinical part of the study of) perhaps reflects the fact that there was some enthusiasm in the UK for investigating the effect of LSD, not only in animals but also humans-both healthy volunteers and psychiatric patients.at Crighton Royal Hospital, Dumfries, gave LSD to 20 volunteer hospital staff and examined mood. They also examined glucose metabolism by use of plasma measures because, as they explained: 'normally the only substance metabolised in the brain cell is glucose'. Not surprisingly, they found little change. Several years later LSD was still being given to volunteers and the change in psychological state was assessed. For example, it was reported that LSD induced some schizophrenia-like effects and that these effects were reduced by administration of 5-HTP. However, the same investigators subsequently concluded that LSD did not induce a schizophrenia-like state, as 5-HTP had little therapeutic effect in people with schizophrenia.gave LSD intravenously in doses up to 60 mg to a mixed group of psychiatric patients in Runwell Hospital, Essex, and examined the subsequent behavioural changes. Although some patients had relatively benign LSDinduced 'trips', one female depressive patient clearly experienced a severe adverse response-she screamed continuously for over 2 h and was reported as having a 'sense of terror'. There was an even more serious adverse event in thestudy, in which one volunteer, a Maudsley Hospital junior doctor, also suffered a bad trip. This event has been described elsewhere by Merton Sandler, who with CMB (Mike) Pare was one of the investigators involved in this study. Needless to say Ethics Committees overseeing clinical investigations in either healthy volunteers or patients were unknown in the 1950s. Phillip Bradley (Figure) undertook his PhD studies in the University of Birmingham laboratory of Joel Elkes, where both preclinical and clinical studies on LSD were being conducted. He also studied the effects of LSD on the electrical activity of the brain of healthy volunteersand showed that the EEG changes observed after LSD were paralleled by the changes in electrical activity seen in unrestrained cats given the drug). Bradley's studies were reported in a series of presentations to the Physiological Society during 1952-1954, and in subsequent full papers. These investigations induced in Bradley a career-long interest in the electrophysiological effects of 5-HT, and he was still publishing major papers on the interaction of LSD with 5-HT neurons in the brains of experimental animals almost 20 years later, although many of the later studies used iontophoretic techniques. Another link between 5-HT and mental state was firmly established in 1955. The year before,had noted that reserpine produced a change not only in blood pressure but also in mental state and also observed that reserpine contained the indole moiety in its structure. Brodie and his colleagues at NIH then reported in a series of papers that reserpine was released from 5-HT from its stores and thereby depleted brain 5-HT contentand they concluded that 5-HT was required for normal brain function. However, this was just speculation and great efforts were made to strengthen the hypothesis by examining other mood-altering drugs, to determine whether they also changed the 5-HT concentration in the brain. Such work is discussed later in this article.
As well as studies on the role of 5-HT in mood regulation, the work of Wilhelm Feldberg and others on the role of cerebral 5-HT and thermoregulation should not be forgotten. In 1964, while working with Myers, an American visitor to his laboratory, Feldberg demonstrated that intraventricular 5-HT raised the body temperature of cats, whereas adrenaline and noradrenaline had the opposite effect. It was suggested that the hypothalamus was the site of action of the amines, as this region contained a substantial amount of endogenous amine. This proposal was supported by a subsequent study that showed that microinjections of amines into the hypothalamus had a similar effect. However,working in Oxford found that, in contrast, 5-HT had a hypothermic action when injected into the cerebral ventricles or hypothalamus of rabbits. The same effect of 5-HT was subsequently reported in mice byworking in the Glaxo Laboratories. Such studies prompted many subsequent studies by others, particularly Myers following his return to the USA (see.
The reasons why UK scientists should have focused primarily on 5-HT when investigating both the pharmacology and the aetiology of affective disorders, whereas American scientists focused more on noradrenalineremains unclear, but it is certainly the impression gained by examining the literature (see below) and crucially when reviewing the opinion of prominent UK scientists active in this period.
Following the proposal that 5-HT might be involved in the control of mood, the logical progression of thought was that therapeutic drugs used to alleviate psychiatric illness might alter the function of 5-HT in the brain. The word serendipity is often used when discussing the development of this research area, and although serendipity undoubtedly did play a role, the major influence was good clinical observation. As stated above, a major initiating factor was the discovery that reserpine, which was known to produce depression in some susceptible people taking it for hypertension, depleted 5-HT in the brain. Analogously, it was observed that the antituberculosis drug iproniazid caused behavioural excitation in some patients, and this compound was found to inhibit MAO activity in vitro. As iproniazid increased the cerebral content of 5-HT following its administration to rats, the idea gained ground that 'depression' and 'excitation' could be related to the lack or excess of 5-HT in the brain. This simple hypothesis was further strengthened by studies on tricyclic antidepressants, when they were subsequently shown to inhibit high-affinity 5-HT and noradrenaline reuptakeand potentiate the action of these amines at the postsynaptic receptor. These areas will only be examined briefly, as most major preclinical discoveries were not made in the UK. Studies on the mechanism of action of the MAO inhibitors on 5-HT biochemistry were primarily conducted outside the UK, although, as pointed out earlier, the discovery of the enzyme occurred in Cambridge, and one of the UK's great biochemical pharmacologists, Hugh Blaschko, was responsible for much of our knowledge on its involvement in the metabolism of catecholamines. Although rather little groundbreaking preclinical research on MAO inhibitor drugs can be claimed by UK scientists during the early 1960s, the synthesis and preclinical evaluation of clorgyline) markedly assisted our understanding of the two enzyme subtypes (see earlier). The push to develop subtype-specific enzyme inhibitors was occasioned by a severe adverse reaction seen in some patients taking MAO inhibitors, which had been detailed in papers from the Maudsley Hospital, London. Although, a junior doctor at the hospital, was not the first person to report on the problem of a hypertensive crisis in some patients taking this type of drug, he was the first to show a clear association with food, and primarily cheese. He suggested that the problem was the presence in cheese of a pressor substance, normally destroyed by MAO, or one involved in the release of catecholamines. He extended his work in two impressive preclinical studies with Marley showing that both cheese and yeast extracts contained pressor substances and that administration of either cheese or yeast extract by intraduodenal injection to cats pretreated with an MAO inhibitor resulted in the detection of tyramine in the plasma. A full review of the pharmacology and clinical problem of foodstuffs and MAO inhibitors was presented to psychiatrists shortly thereafter. There is a significant number of foodstuffs that are contraindicated with MAO inhibitors (Table), which makes prescribing such drugs hazardous. Although the so-called 'cheese reaction' did much to deter psychiatrists from prescribing MAO inhibitors, it was another major study in the UK that increased their antipathy towards this class of drug. This was a multicentre study on the efficacy in depressed patients of imipramine versus the MAO inhibitor phenelzine versus electroconvulsive therapy, which was conducted under the auspices of the Medical Research Council. The data suggested that phenelzine was no better than placebo (Table). The publicationwas much criticized by some psychiatrists, who questioned not only the dose used but also the patient selection, arguing that MAO inhibitors were better in patients with 'reactive' rather than 'endogenous' depression, although such terms were contentious even then. The end result was that many felt that it was much safer to prescribe a tricyclic antidepressant for their depressed patients rather than a drug carrying with it a problem associated with ingestion of several foodstuffs and with questionable efficacy. The market for MAO inhibitors never recovered. The food interaction problem led in part to the suggestion that an MAO inhibitor that did not inhibit the subtype responsible for metabolizing tyramine (MAO A ) might provide an antidepressant effect without the foodinduced adverse events. However, the failure of the subtypeselective MAO inhibitors to demonstrate a high degree of clinical efficacy has resulted in MAO inhibitors continuing to have a limited application in the treatment of depression even after the discovery of modern MAO A -selective drugs such as moclobemide. The tricyclic antidepressant drugs were evolved from structural modifications of the phenothiazine type of antischizophrenic drugs, such as chlorpromazine. These compounds came into clinical use following the observation that they had antidepressant rather than antipsychotic activity and with little if any knowledge of their possible mechanism of action. A major indication of their possible mechanism came from the laboratory of Todrick in Dumfries, Scotland, who found that the 5-HT concentration in the platelets of depressed patients increased when they were treated with MAO inhibitors, but decreased when they were given tricyclic antidepressants. It was suggested that imipramine depletion of 5-HT might involve competition with the uptake process rather than 'destruction' of the stored amine, as with reserpine. However, by 1964 the same group were clearly persuaded that tricyclic antidepressants inhibited 5-HT uptake and were reporting on the structure-activity relationships of the tricyclic compounds using inhibition of 5-HT uptake by the platelet. The role of uptake by tissues on amine inactivation, and indeed on its possible effect in terms of potentiating the action of amines at the postsynaptic receptor, was just beginning to be understood in the 1960s.in Oxford suggested that noradrenaline could be taken up by nerve endings during their studies on the spleen, and subsequently Axelrod, working with Weil-Malherbe (who by then had left the UK to work at the NIH), studied the fate of labelled noradrenaline in animals. These early studies by Axelrod and colleagues paved the way for major investigations conducted by Leslie Iversen at Cambridge University, which did so much to clarify the uptake systems of catecholamines by nerve endings. However, a fuller understanding of 5-HT uptake and its functional consequences had to await the activities of a dynamic group of Swedish scientists (pharmacologists, biochemists and histologists) working at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm and the Department of Pharmacology at the University of Gothenburg. Major names included Arvid Carlsson, Nils Hillarp, Hans Corrodi, Kjell Fuxe, Tomas Ho ¨kfelt, Urban Ungerstedt, Go ¨sta Jonsson and Nils-Erik A ´nden. The output from these neuroscientists was prodigious, and from the mid-to late 1960s they demonstrated that 5-HT had its own selective uptake system, and that this resulted in increased synaptic concentrations of the monoamine and resultant feedback inhibition of 5-HT synthesis. It was many of these same scientists who, during the 1960s, also performed the first full mapping of the 5-hydroxytryptaminergic pathways in the brain by the use of fluorescent histochemical techniques.
The major early studies on the therapeutic effects of putative antidepressant compounds were conducted before or very soon after the formation of the Dunlop Committee, which was the forerunner of the Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM), the UK equivalent of the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Studies in those days were not performed in accordance with current experimental criteria such as blinding or randomization and with no apparent understanding of the patient numbers required to produce a result with some statistical validity. A good example is the first major paper on imipramine, which reported on studies in 500 patients but did so in a purely qualitative way, with meaningless statements such as 'side effects are relatively slight' and 'often a feeling of dryness of mouth' and with no mathematical evaluation of efficacy anywhere in the paper. Against that one must remember that in the early 1950s there were no effective treatments for the major psychiatric illnesses (apart from electroconvulsive therapy). Consequently, experienced psychiatrists were familiar with patients with long-term intractable illness, and any treatment that produced a positive effect was reasonably likely to be real. As Donald Eccleston remarked about the lack of a placebo group in many early studies: 'But if someone has been ill for-the average was 7 years-then in some ways they act as their own control'. The lack of improvement seen in many patients before the advent of psychoactive drugs has also been commented on by Alec Coppen (Figure). In remarks about the introduction of the antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs he stated: 'when I go to West Park Hospital now I find about 400 patients suffering from dementia. What a contrast to 40 years ago when there were 2000 very disturbed young and middle aged patients, many of whom are now leading ordinary and rewarding lives thanks to these advances'. It is also worth mentioning that it was the bold experimental clinical approaches used in the 1950s and early 1960s that produced many important advances in our understanding. Such studies would now be impossible to conduct. It was Coppen who was responsible for several major findings when experimenting on new therapeutic approaches to depressive illness. Noting that the paper ofdemonstrated that administration of an MAO inhibitor plus tryptophan increased the concentrations of 5-HT and tryptamine in the brain, and conscious of the albeit limited evidence that 5-HT might be deficient in depression,gave tranylcypromine to depressed subjects and then administered either placebo or DL-tryptophan (214 mg kg À1 ) in divided doses. The patients given the amino acid were reported to show a greater improvement than those given only tranylcypromine. This result was rapidly confirmed by. Coppen also examined the effect of tryptophan alone and reported an antidepressant effect, but again noted a greater effect if an MAO inhibitor had also been given. These studies naturally helped focus thought on the role of 5-HT in depression and raised the possibility that there might be a lowered concentration of the amine in the brain of the depressed patient.
If, as much of the data then being generated suggested, alteration of the cerebral 5-HT concentration was the mechanism by which antidepressant drugs achieved their therapeutic effect, the obvious corollary was that there might be an abnormality in 5-HT concentrations in the brains of depressed patients, which could be detected post mortem. Furthermore, it might be possible to detect the effects of antidepressant treatments on 5-hydroxyindoles post mortem. A major observation indicating that it might be possible to undertake meaningful post-mortem investigations was reported by Daphne Joyce while she was working at the Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London. She found that 5-HT loss in both rodent and human brain was slow, provided that the brain remained in situ; but that following its removal from the cranium the 5-HT concentration decreased rapidly unless the tissue was immediately frozen. Much of the pioneering clinical work was undertaken under the leadership of Mike Pare, a psychiatrist at St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, and RS (Sam) Stacey, Professor of Pharmacology and Therapeutics at St Thomas' Hospital, London. They first confirmed that tissue 5-HT loss was modest if the body was stored at 2 1C until autopsy, when cerebral tissue was taken, divided into regions and frozen. They then examined cerebral 5-HT content in controls and patients who had been ingesting MAO inhibitors up until death. The major finding was that brain 5-HT content did not rise appreciably until the patient had been taking an MAO inhibitor for more than 2 weeks, with a maximum and consistent raised concentration after 4 weeks. This, as they pointed out, corresponded closely to the time required for the drugs to produce a clear antidepressant effect. These data therefore provided a basis for believing that antidepressant drugs acted via a change in cerebral 5-HT concentration and function. The next step they took was to examine if there was an abnormality in cerebral 5-HT in depressed patients. In this later study, they examined brain 5-HT concentrations in patients who had committed suicide. Both 5-HT and 5-HIAA were measured. No difference in 5-HIAA was detected between controls and suicides and although a modest loss in 5-HT was observed this was proposed to be, at least in part, an age-related effect. Other UK groups were also reporting decreased levels of either 5-HT or 5-HIAA in the hindbrain of suicides. Later studies generally failed to confirm these findings, which may have been influenced by age, sampling or post-mortem conditions. Nevertheless, one should not underestimate the novel approaches being used by the investigators at the time the studies were performed.
Another clinical approach to the question as to whether there was a defect in monoamine function in the brain was developed in Edinburgh. This involved examination of monoamine metabolites in CSF and resulted to some extent from the excellent links between preclinical and clinical psychiatrists working at this university. The initial impetus for the studies came from the work of Dennis Sharman, who in 1960 was completing his PhD studies. He had obtained one of the first Aminco-Bowman spectrophotofluorometers in the UK and used it to measure 5-HIAA in human CSF. He showed that depressed patients had a lowered concentration of 5-HIAA in the CSF. This initiated a major series of both preclinicaland clinicalstudies, which continued through the 1960s. To support this finding and confirm that the 5-HIAA concentration in the lumbar CSF reflected the concentration of the ventricular CSF, a series of major studies were initiated using implanted tubes in dog brain to measure ventricular or cisterna magna CSF to determine whether the 5-HIAA concentration in the lumbar CSF reflected the concentration in higher brain centres. Other studies were conducted using probenecid to block acid metabolite transport from the brain. Many of these studies were reviewed by the Edinburgh investigators at the timebut, despite promising data, the approach gradually fell out of favour. This was partly due to ethical aspects, as it is hard to justify lumbar puncture, which is both painful and unpleasant and also carries a small but definite risk and which furthermore was not proving to have value as either a diagnostic or a therapeutic tool. Results also tended to be too inconsistent for clear conclusions to be drawn. Furthermore, the origin of lumbar CSF 5-HIAA started to be questioned together with its relationship to 5-HT functional activity. The observation bythat patients with a partial block in CSF flow had normal lumbar CSF values argued for a mainly spinal origin for 5-HIAA. Later data strengthened this proposal and indicated that lowered lumbar CSF probably reflected the low level of motor activity of depressed patients.
The huge amount of data on the action of antidepressant drugs on monoaminergic transmission and the clinical studies on patient tissues were developed during the 1960s into a framework that has often been called the 'monoamine hypothesis'. At its most basic this stated that depression is caused by a decrease in the concentration or function of monoamines (5-HT and/or noradrenaline) and that antidepressant drugs increased concentrations or function by inhibiting monoamine breakdown (MAO inhibitors) or by increasing the concentrations of monoamines in the synaptic cleft (reuptake inhibitors). While work continued during the 1970s to try and support this hypothesis, with the examination of monoamine receptors in post-mortem tissue from patients who had died during an episode of depression or by suicide, overall the results obtained did not lead to any allencompassing theory. This is perhaps not surprising, given our present knowledge of neurotransmitter interactions, adaptation and modulation. However, at the time good logic underpinned the studies, and our current position results from the information generated, even if negative. Without these studies we might still be wondering whether some primary abnormality might be detectable in the CNS. We should also not underestimate the value of the hypothesis in helping us reach our current position of knowledge and it is worth quoting Professor Hermann van Praag on this point: 'Quite apart from the fact that it probably contains a kernel of truth, the heuristic value of the monoamine hypothesis for psychiatry cannot be overestimated. It has catalysed an impressive amount of research'. Although it is true that none of the data on their own are very impressive, when all the information generated is put together it remains hard to resist the conclusion that monoamines are involved in the pathogenesis of depression and that most, if not all, antidepressant drugs act in a way that involves monoamines. It is notable that in 2000 the top five drugs being sold that act on CNS function all modulate the function of 5-HT. What remains fascinating is how controversial such proposals were at the time of their development. This can be gathered from a sentence in the classic review paper of Alec Coppen, which illustrates the fact that at this time there were many who did not even believe that depression might have a biochemical causation. His review was titled 'The biochemistry of affective disorders' and it started: 'The title of this review would be regarded by some psychiatrists as provocative; they would relegate the biochemical concomitants of depression and mania to a secondary position and deny that biochemical changes have any place in the aetiology of these conditions'. We can be proud of the UK pioneers whose work led to the acceptance of the idea that brain biochemistry is intimately involved in mood disorder and that altering monoamine function can produce clinical improvement in psychiatric disorders. We do, of course, remain in ignorance as to the detailed biological causation of the problem. Monoamine function does appear to be abnormal in depressed patients but how this relates to the clinical syndrome is unclear.
A relatively small group of scientists, initially in Edinburgh (and continuing for 20 years), joined by another loose knit group in London, provided most of the major UK-based neuropharmacology discoveries on 5-HT during the 20 years under evaluation. It is interesting to note how much the London scientists interacted with each other over this time. It is reasonable to propose that the initial impetus for this flow of information was the work of John Gaddum, who not only detected 5-HT in the brain but also showed that LSD antagonized the action of 5-HT on peripheral tissue. The inspired jump to proposing that 5-HT might therefore be involved in the regulation of mood followed immediately. What is equally interesting is how quickly findings in animal studies were translated into clinical investigations by interested psychiatrists (and then back again for further preclinical investigations). The data produced have provided the basis for most of our current knowledge of antidepressant therapy. Of course, subtypes of 5-HT receptors were not even thought about in the period that has been examined, but would come into their own in the late 1970s and beyond. However, it can be argued plausibly that the advances made in 5-HT neuropharmacology and psychopharmacology in the 1950-1970 period were proportionately much greater than those made after that time. This is unquestionably true if we relate the number of major findings to the modest number of people involved in the research. As stated earlier, the word serendipity has often used for the growth of observations concerning the proposal that 5-HT might be involved in the control of mood and the idea that therapeutic drugs used to alleviate psychiatric illness might alter the function of 5-HT in the brain. However, we can knock this simplistic notion on the head with a final comment from Sir John Gaddum, the father of 5-HT research in the UK: 'It is true that many discoveries (in Pharmacology) have been accidents, but these accidents would not have occurred to anyone who was not engaged in a systematic research for new knowledge, and without the techniques and apparatus of modern science they would usually have passed unheeded in the modern world'. medal he informed me that he really did not need the accompanying cheque, and he asked me to raise with the Committee a proposal that the money be used to found an award to enable applicants to study a historical aspect of pharmacology of their choice. The British Pharmacological Society Committee supported the idea enthusiastically and matched the money he had donated, thereby establishing the Paton Historical Research Fund. At that time I had no idea that I would ever be applying to the fund for support, and I can but hope that Bill would have approved of this article.
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
McKenna, D., Riba, J. · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences (2016)
Kometer, M., Vollenweider, F. X. · Behavioral Neurobiology of Psychedelic Drugs (2016)