How Psychedelic-Assisted Treatment Works in the Bayesian Brain
The paper proposes that psychedelics attenuate the precision of high-level predictions (REBUS), thereby amplifying psychotherapy’s common factors (set and setting) so that bottom-up input more readily revises maladaptive beliefs, accelerating therapeutic change and symptom relief.
Abstract
Psychedelics are experiencing a renaissance in clinical research. In recent years, an increasing number of studies on psychedelic-assisted treatment have been conducted. So far, the results are promising, suggesting that this new (or rather, rediscovered) form of therapy has great potential. One particular reason for that appears to be the synergistic combination of the pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions in psychedelic-assisted treatment. But how exactly do these two interventions complement each other? This paper provides the first account of the interaction between pharmacological and psychological effects in psychedelic-assisted treatment. Building on the relaxed beliefs under psychedelics (REBUS) hypothesis of Carhart-Harris and Friston and the contextual model of Wampold, it argues that psychedelics amplify the common factors and thereby the remedial effects of psychotherapy. More precisely, psychedelics are assumed to attenuate the precision of high-level predictions, making them more revisable by bottom-up input. Psychotherapy constitutes an important source of such input. At best, it signalizes a safe and supportive environment (cf. setting) and induces remedial expectations (cf. set). During treatment, these signals should become incorporated when high-level predictions are revised: a process that is hypothesized to occur as a matter of course in psychotherapy but to get reinforced and accelerated under psychedelics. Ultimately, these revisions should lead to a relief of symptoms.
Research Summary of 'How Psychedelic-Assisted Treatment Works in the Bayesian Brain'
Introduction
Psychedelic research has undergone a marked revival over recent decades, with rising numbers of clinical trials and renewed public and academic interest. After an early flowering in the 1950s and 1960s that was curtailed by regulatory prohibition, contemporary studies have investigated psychedelics such as LSD, psilocybin and DMT across conditions including depression, OCD, anxiety and substance use. Despite promising clinical signals, understanding remains incomplete because psychedelic administration is typically embedded within psychotherapeutic programmes, blurring the boundary between pharmacological and psychological mechanisms of change. This paper sets out to integrate two explanatory frameworks: the relaxed beliefs under psychedelics (REBUS) hypothesis, which is grounded in the free-energy principle and predictive processing, and Wampold's contextual model of psychotherapy, which emphasises common factors such as the therapeutic relationship and expectations. Aaronson and colleagues aim to provide a first comprehensive account of how the pharmacological actions of psychedelics and psychotherapeutic elements interact to produce remedial effects, and they outline testable hypotheses that follow from this integrative perspective.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Topics
- APA Citation
Villiger, D. (2022). How Psychedelic-Assisted Treatment Works in the Bayesian Brain. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.812180
References (26)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Rucker, J., Iliff, J., Nutt, D. J. · Neuropharmacology (2017)
Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R., Hendricks, P. S. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2018)
Luoma, J. B., Sabucedo, P., Eriksson, J. et al. · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (2019)
Strassman, R. J., Qualls, C .R. · JAMA Psychiatry (1994)
Vollenweider, F. X., Leenders, K. L., Maguire, P. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (1997)
Moreno, F. A., Wiegand, C. B., Taitano, E. K. et al. · Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (2006)
Andersen, K. A. A., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Nutt, D. J. et al. · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (2020)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Friston, K. J. · Pharmacological Reviews (2019)
Gukasyan, N., Nayak, S. · Preprints (2020)
Nayak, S., Johnson, M. W. · Pharmacopsychiatry (2020)
Show all 26 referencesShow fewer
Nichols, D. E. · Pharmacology and Therapeutics (2004)
Nour, M. R., Evans, J., Nutt, D. J. et al. · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2016)
Timmermann, C., Roseman, L., Williams, L. et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2018)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Kaelen, M., Bolstridge, M. et al. · Psychological Medicine (2016)
Wittmann, M., Hasler, F., Vollenweider, F. X. · Neuroscience Letters (2008)
Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., Mccann, U. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2006)
Vollenweider, F. X., Vollenweider-Scherpenhuyzen, M. F. I., Bäbler, A. et al. · NeuroReport (1998)
Watts, R., Day, C. M., Krzanowski, J. et al. · Journal of Humanistic Psychology (2017)
Muthukumaraswamy, S., Forsyth, B., Lumley, T. · Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology (2021)
Olson, J. A., Suissa-Rocheleau, L., Lifshitz, M. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2020)
Madsen, M. K., Stenbaek, D. S., Arvidsson, A. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2021)
Luppi, A. I., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L. et al. · NeuroImage (2021)
Umbricht, A., Vollenweider, F. X., Schmid, L. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2003)
Vollenweider, F. X., Preller, K. H. · Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2020)
Kaelen, M., Roseman, L., Kahan, J. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2016)
Kaertner, L. S., Steinborn, M. B., Kettner, H. et al. · Scientific Reports (2021)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.