Interrupting the Psychedelic Experience Through Contextual Manipulation to Study Experience Efficacy
This secondary analysis from a DMT study explores the impact of intentional cognitive interruptions on psychedelic experiences. The study investigates whether increasing cognitive load during the experience affects subjective ratings, hypothesizing that higher task demands would lower these ratings. Additionally, it examines whether reduced task demands correlate with larger reductions in long-term depressive symptoms.
Authors
- Robin Carhart-Harris
- David Nutt
- Christopher Timmermann
Published
Abstract
Under the psychedelic therapy paradigm, instead of looking at drug efficacy, researchers look at experience efficacy, defined as how certain experiences can be therapeutic. To test experience efficacy, researchers need to develop new research tools to manipulate the experience without changing the pharmacology. We suggest that intentional cognitive interruptions can help inquire into experience efficacy by experimentally interfering with the experience. To strengthen this suggestion, we present a secondary analysis from our 2023 N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) study, investigating whether it is possible to interrupt the psychedelic experience by increasing cognitive load and whether an interrupted experience is associated with reduced long-term mental health changes. We hypothesized that subjective ratings of the psychedelic experience would be lower when task demands were higher and reductions in long-term depressive symptoms would be larger with fewer task demands during the experience.
Research Summary of 'Interrupting the Psychedelic Experience Through Contextual Manipulation to Study Experience Efficacy'
Introduction
Psychedelic therapy research increasingly treats the subjective experience induced by a psychedelic as the therapeutic agent, shifting focus from drug pharmacology to what the authors call “experience efficacy.” Previous work has linked particular experiential qualities — for example feelings of unity, spiritual-type experiences, insightfulness and altered meaning — with therapeutic outcomes, but methods to manipulate those experiences experimentally without changing the drug itself are limited. Roseman and colleagues propose that intentionally interrupting an ongoing psychedelic experience with cognitive tasks could serve as a tool to test experience efficacy. To illustrate this approach, they present a secondary analysis of data from their 2023 DMT study, testing whether increasing in-session cognitive load (operationalised here by asking participants to provide verbal intensity ratings every 60 seconds) attenuates subjective experience and whether such interruptions are associated with smaller improvements in depressive symptoms two weeks later. They hypothesised lower subjective experience ratings under higher task demands and larger reductions in depressive symptoms when task demands were absent during the experience.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topic
- Authors
- APA Citation
Roseman, L., Erritzoe, D., Nutt, D., Carhart-Harris, R., & Timmermann, C. (2024). Interrupting the Psychedelic Experience Through Contextual Manipulation to Study Experience Efficacy. JAMA Network Open, 7(7), e2422181. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.22181
References (6)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Schenberg, E. E. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Timmermann, C., Roseman, L., Haridas, S. et al. · PNAS (2023)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Vollenweider, F. X. · PLOS ONE (2010)
Timmermann, C., Zeifman, R. J., Erritzoe, D. et al. · Scientific Reports (2024)
Kangaslampi, S. · Journal of Psychedelic Studies (2023)
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Cited By (3)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Marek, G. J., Makai-Bölöni, S., Umbricht, D. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2025)
Egger, K., Redondo, J. J., Müller, J. et al. · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy (2025)
Sanders, J. W., Milliere, R., Daily, Z. G. et al. · Preprints (2024)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.