Right-Wing Psychedelia: Case Studies in Cultural Plasticity and Political Pluripotency
This paper (2021) explores the ability of psychedelics to alter political beliefs or religious beliefs. Contrary to the popularized idea that psychedelic use is linked to increased environmental concern and liberal politics, it is argued that the psychedelic experience can lead to a shift in any direction of political belief. Case studies are used to support the idea of psychedelics as politically pluripotent.
Abstract
Recent media advocacy for the nascent psychedelic medicine industry has emphasized the potential for psychedelics to improve society, pointing to research studies that have linked psychedelics to increased environmental concern and liberal politics. However, research supporting the hypothesis that psychedelics induce a shift in political beliefs must address the many historical and contemporary cases of psychedelic users who remained authoritarian in their views after taking psychedelics or became radicalized after extensive experience with them. We propose that the common anecdotal accounts of psychedelics precipitating radical shifts in political or religious beliefs result from the contextual factors of set and setting, and have no particular directional basis on the axes of conservatism-liberalism or authoritarianism-egalitarianism. Instead, we argue that any experience which challenges a person's fundamental worldview-including a psychedelic experience-can precipitate shifts in any direction of political belief. We suggest that the historical record supports the concept of psychedelics as “politically pluripotent,” non-specific amplifiers of the political set and setting. Contrary to recent assertions, we show that conservative, hierarchy-based ideologies are able to assimilate psychedelic experiences of interconnection, as expressed by thought leaders like Jordan Peterson, corporadelic actors, and members of several neo-Nazi organizations.
Research Summary of 'Right-Wing Psychedelia: Case Studies in Cultural Plasticity and Political Pluripotency'
Introduction
Psychedelic experiences have long been associated with dispositional change, a perception rooted in the association between classical psychedelics and the social movements of the late 1960s and 1970s. Contemporary clinical and survey work has fuelled renewed enthusiasm, with studies reporting increases in openness, prosociality, nature relatedness and, in some datasets, lower authoritarianism among people with lifetime psychedelic experience. Against this background, media and some commentators have suggested that psychedelic therapy might produce broad societal benefits by shifting people toward more progressive or inclusive politics. Pace and colleagues set out to interrogate that assumption. Rather than accepting a unidirectional effect of psychedelics on political orientation, they propose and illustrate a competing model: psychedelics act as non-specific amplifiers of pre-existing psychological and social context, a phenomenon they term "political pluripotency." The paper aims to marshal historical, ethnographic and contemporary case material, alongside psychological mechanisms such as suggestibility and meaning-enhancement, to show that psychedelic experiences can be assimilated to conservative and authoritarian worldviews as well as liberal ones, depending on set and setting and broader structural forces. The authors frame this argument as important for both research design and public discourse about the social implications of the psychedelic renaissance.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Topics
- Author
- APA Citation
Pace, B. A., & Devenot, N. (2021). Right-Wing Psychedelia: Case Studies in Cultural Plasticity and Political Pluripotency. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733185
References (15)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L., Haijen, E. C. H. M. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2018)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Kaelen, M., Whalley, M. G. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2014)
Dupuis, D. · Transcultural Psychiatry (2021)
Forstmann, M., Sagioglou, C. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
Gearin, A. K., Devenot, N. · International Journal of Cultural Studies (2021)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
Hartogsohn, I. · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2018)
Johnson, M. W. · ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science (2020)
Kettner, H., Gandy, S., Haijen, E. C. H. M. et al. · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2019)
Lyons, T., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2018)
Show all 15 referencesShow fewer
Maclean, K. A., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2011)
Marseille, E., Kahn, J. G., Yazar-Klosinski, B. et al. · PLOS ONE (2020)
McGovern, H., Leptourgos, P., Hutchinson, B. et al. · Psyarxiv (2021)
Moreton, S. G., Szalla, L., Menzies, R. E. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2019)
Nour, M. R., Evans, J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2017)
Cited By (2)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Aday, J. S., Glynos, N., Baker, A. et al. · Preprints (2024)
Aday, J. S., Heifets, B. D., Pratscher, S. D. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2021)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.