Anxiety DisordersDepressive DisordersPTSDImplementation & Service DeliveryLSDPsilocybin

Socio-psychedelic imaginaries: envisioning and building legal psychedelic worlds in the United States

Based on three years of ethnographic research in the United States, this paper identifies and interprets four contemporary socio-psychedelic imaginaries — biomedicalization, decriminalization, legalization and sacramental — and analyses how they converge and diverge around politics of access, responsibility, naming, assimilation and epistemic credibility. It argues these co‑evolving imaginaries mutually shape and amplify one another, functioning as a societal corrective to decades of prohibition while rooted in human–psychedelic entanglements.

Authors

  • Schwarz-Plaschg, C.

Published

European Journal of Futures Research
individual Study

Abstract

After decades of criminalization, psychedelic substances such as psilocybin and LSD are experiencing their comeback in science and Western culture more broadly. While psychedelic plants and fungi have a long history of use in Indigenous cultures, the Western prohibitionist reality instantiated around 1970 has stigmatized psychedelics as medically useless and a threat to society. Yet studies are increasingly demonstrating their potential to treat widespread mental health conditions such as PTSD, depression, or anxiety in combination with psychotherapy. Most of this research is currently taking place in the US, where additionally decriminalization and legalization efforts and religious exemptions have paved the way to make psychedelics legally accessible. Based on 3 years of ethnographic research in the US (both in-person and virtual), this article explores contemporary US-American socio-psychedelic imaginaries, i.e., collective visions articulated and enacted to reintegrate psychedelics legally and responsibly into society. Four socio-psychedelic imaginaries are identified, described, and interpreted: the biomedicalization imaginary, decriminalization imaginary, legalization imaginary, and sacramental imaginary. These imaginaries diverge and converge around several politics: politics of access, politics of responsibility, politics of naming, politics of assimilation and social change, and politics of epistemic credibility. Contemporary socio-psychedelic imaginaries are co-evolving, mutually shaping, and amplifying each other. Together they function as societal corrective to the politically motivated prohibition of psychedelics. Although enacted by humans, the radical imagination expressed in socio-psychedelic imaginaries has its roots in human-psychedelics entanglements.

Available with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'Socio-psychedelic imaginaries: envisioning and building legal psychedelic worlds in the United States'

Introduction

Schwarz-Plaschg situates the paper in the context of a long-standing prohibitionist legal regime that, since the early 1970s, placed classic psychedelics into the strictest criminal category and largely halted research and aboveground cultural uses. From the late 1990s and especially around the turn of the millennium, psychedelic research and public interest have resurged in the United States, producing clinical trials, media attention, and parallel policy experiments such as municipal decriminalization and religious exemptions. The author highlights tensions in this revival: while biomedical pathways aim to reintegrate psychedelics via evidence-based clinicalisation and regulatory approval, other movements resist or reconfigure that trajectory on grounds of access, cultural belonging, and alternative epistemologies. The article sets out to map and analyse contemporary US socio-psychedelic imaginaries — collective visions and practices that aim to make psychedelics legally and responsibly available. Using the concept of socio-psychedelic imaginaries, Schwarz-Plaschg identifies four distinct imaginaries (the biomedicalization, decriminalization, legalization, and sacramental imaginaries) and proposes to compare them across several political axes (access, responsibility, naming, assimilation/social change, and epistemic credibility). The stated aim is both descriptive (documenting how these imaginaries are articulated and enacted) and interpretative (exploring their divergences, convergences, and mutual shaping).

Expert Research Summaries

Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.

Full Text PDF

Full Paper PDF

Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.

Study Details

References (9)

Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom

A Qualitative Study of Intention and Impact of Ayahuasca Use by Westerners

Bathje, G. J., Fenton, J., Pillersdorf, D. et al. · Journal of Humanistic Psychology (2021)

18 cited
Mapping an Agenda for Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy Research in Patients with Serious Illness

Beaussant, Y., Tulsky, J., Guérin, B. et al. · Journal of Palliative Medicine (2021)

Psychedelic medicalization, public discourse, and the morality of ego dissolution

Gearin, A. K., Devenot, N. · International Journal of Cultural Studies (2021)

Psilocybin occasioned mystical-type experiences: immediate and persisting dose-related effects

Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2011)

Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance

Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., Mccann, U. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2006)

Set and Setting in the Santo Daime

Hartogsohn, I. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2021)

Cited By (2)

Papers in Blossom that reference this study

Your Personal Research Library

Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.

Socio-psychedelic imaginaries: envisioning and... — Research Summary & Context | Blossom