Trial PaperMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD)Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD)Depressive DisordersKetamineEsketaminePlacebo

Treatment Response With Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus an Oral Antidepressant in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Without Evidence of Early Response: A Pooled Post Hoc Analysis of the TRANSFORM Studies

This pooled analysis of two phase III studies (n=518, TRANSFORM) finds that for those who didn’t respond, continued treatment may still be beneficial. This was both true for the esketamine group and the group that received a placebo.

Authors

  • Scott Wilkinson
  • Ibrahim Turkoz
  • Ella Daly

Published

Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
individual Study

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate response to esketamine nasal spray plus an oral antidepressant (ESK + AD) at day 28 in patients with major depressive disorder (DSM-5) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD) who did not meet response criteria within the first week of treatment.

Methods

The current study is a pooled post hoc analysis of two phase 3, double-blind, active-controlled studies, conducted between August 2015 and February 2018, comparing ESK + AD with an oral antidepressant plus placebo (AD + PBO). Early treatment response was defined as a ≥ 50% decrease in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score at day 2 or days 2 and 8. Response rates at day 28 were determined among those not meeting early response criteria.

Results

518 patients in the analysis had day 28 observations (ESK + AD, n = 310; AD + PBO, n = 208). A greater percentage of patients treated with ESK + AD versus AD + PBO met response criteria beginning at day 2 (17.3% [55/318] vs 9.4% [19/203]) and at all subsequent timepoints, including day 28 (58.7% [182/310] vs 45.2% [94/208]). In day 2 nonresponders, 54.9% vs 44.3% (ESK + AD vs AD + PBO, respectively) achieved response at day 28 (P < .01). Similarly, among day 2 and 8 nonresponders, 52.1% vs 42.4% achieved response by day 28 (P = .01). In nonresponders at day 2 and at days 2 and 8, the odds ratio for a response at day 28 was 1.61 (95% CI, 1.09-2.40) with ESK + AD versus 1.56 (95% CI, 1.04-2.35) with AD + PBO.

Conclusions

Patients with TRD without a demonstrated response within the first week of treatment may still derive benefit from a full 4-week induction course of esketamine nasal spray.

Available with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'Treatment Response With Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus an Oral Antidepressant in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Without Evidence of Early Response: A Pooled Post Hoc Analysis of the TRANSFORM Studies'

Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) causes substantial morbidity and disability, and a sizeable proportion of patients do not achieve an adequate response after multiple oral antidepressant trials. The term treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is used for patients who fail to respond to ≥ 2 antidepressants in the current major depressive episode, and for many patients the cumulative time spent on ineffective treatments is substantial. Rapid-acting therapies such as ketamine analogues have raised expectations for early improvement, yet individual trajectories vary and lack of an early response does not necessarily predict ultimate nonresponse. Turkoz and colleagues set out to examine whether adults with TRD who do not show an early response to treatment with esketamine nasal spray plus a newly started oral antidepressant (ESK + AD) might nevertheless achieve a clinically meaningful response by the end of a standard 4-week induction phase. Using pooled data from two Phase III, double-blind, active-controlled TRANSFORM studies, the analysis specifically estimated day 28 response rates among patients who failed to meet predefined early-response criteria at day 2 or at days 2 and 8.

Expert Research Summaries

Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.

Full Text PDF

Full Paper PDF

Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.

Study Details

Related Clinical Trials

Cited By (3)

Papers in Blossom that reference this study

Reconsidering “dissociation” as a predictor of antidepressant efficacy for esketamine

Mathai, D. S., Nayak, S., Yaden, D. B. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2023)

29 cited
103 cited
Real-world effectiveness of ketamine in treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review & meta-analysis

Alnefeesi, Y., Chen-Li, D., Jawad, M. Y. et al. · Journal of Psychiatric Research (2022)

Your Personal Research Library

Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.

Treatment Response With Esketamine Nasal Spray... — Research Summary & Context | Blossom