Back to competency map

Clinical competency

Adverse effects and side-effect management

Teaches recognition and management of expected and unexpected side effects during psychedelic or ketamine treatment. The competency emphasizes active observation, supportive response, and clinical escalation when symptoms exceed routine tolerability.

Mixed evidenceModern clinical

Looking for something specific? Ask Blossom

Guidelines

14

Courses

1

Providers

1

Protocols

6

Classification

Source quality

Course pageProtocol paperTrial supplement

Also known as

Adverse effect and side-effect managementAdverse effect and side-effect surveillanceAdverse effect assessmentAdverse effect managementAdverse effect monitoring and responseAdverse effect recognition and managementAdverse event recognition and monitoringAdverse reaction recognition and responseAdverse-effect managementManagement of acute adverse effectsManagement of ketamine-related adverse effectsMonitor adverse events and tolerabilityMonitor and respond to adverse reactionsMonitor safety and tolerability during combined treatmentSide-effect surveillance

Across the manuals

The manuals converge on active safety monitoring as a core part of psychedelic and ketamine treatment. Across ayahuasca, LSD, psilocybin, ketamine, ibogaine, and mescaline protocols, the sources describe systematic observation, documentation of adverse events, and attention to both physical and psychological reactions, including nausea, vomiting, anxiety, agitation, blood pressure changes, and other emergent safety concerns. They also converge on the need to distinguish expected, usually tolerable effects from reactions that may require escalation. Several sources mention supportive responses such as reassurance, comfort measures, post-session monitoring, and rescue medication pathways, while ketamine sources add clearer emergency thresholds for sedation, hypoxia, airway problems, or hypertensive emergency. Ayahuasca sources place particular emphasis on emesis management, while ketamine sources place more emphasis on cardiovascular, respiratory, and behavioural risk. Sources differ mainly in the kinds of adverse effects they foreground and the level of specificity in response. Some manuals focus on vomiting and comfort measures, others on structured side-effect surveillance across multiple follow-up points, and others on rare but serious complications such as laryngospasm, aspiration risk, arrhythmia, or inability to arouse. A few extracts also note specific tools or pathways, such as formal side-effect scales, rescue medication decisions, or medical supervision periods, whereas other sources simply stress vigilant observation and documentation.

In practice

What it looks like on the ground

  • Documents adverse events and their timing relative to dosing sessions
  • Monitors for both physical symptoms and psychological distress during and after treatment
  • Escalates concern when symptoms suggest hypoxia, unstable vitals, or severe agitation
  • Uses supportive measures for vomiting, nausea, or acute distress and records the response

Assessment signals in the sources

UKU Side Effect ScaleList of Complaints

Synthesised from the linked source documents; refreshed as the library updates.

Linked sources

The guidelines, courses, and providers that evidence this competency. Full lists are a Blossom Pro feature.

Linked guidelines (14)

  • Antidepressant Effects of a Single Dose of Ayahuasca in Patients With Recurrent Depression: A SPECT Study

    DMT / AyahuascaEvidence score: 100

Unlock every linked source

See all linked guidelines, courses, and providers behind this competency, plus the full competency graph.