A review of psychedelics trials completed in depression, informed by European regulatory perspectives
This systematic review (s=8) analyses completed controlled trials of psychedelics for depression, including psilocybin, LSD, ayahuasca, and DMT, all in Phase II or I/II. It evaluates methodological patterns against the draft European Medicines Agency guideline revision, highlighting challenges such as unblinding, expectancy, and adverse event characterisation, while calling for larger studies to assess long-term efficacy and safety.
Authors
- Silva, F.
- Butlen-Ducuing, F.
- Guizzaro, L.
Published
Abstract
There is a growing body of clinical research on the therapeutic potential of psychedelics for the treatment of mental health disorders, notably depression. Accordingly, the new revision of the European Medicines Agency guideline on the clinical investigation of products for depression will incorporate a section covering specific regulatory recommendations for the design of studies with psychedelics. The present review investigated the methodological approaches adopted in completed controlled trials of psychedelics for depression in light of initial considerations included in the draft guideline revision. A systematic search conducted on scientific databases (Embase and Medline) and clinical trial registries (clinicaltrials.gov and WHO ICTPR) identified 8 completed trials as of February 2024. The trials tested psilocybin, LSD, Ayahuasca, and DMT, for major depressive disorder or treatment-resistant depression, and were all pahse 2 or 1/2. Patterns in pre-defined methodological variables pertaining to trial design, population, interventions, outcome measures and safety assessments were analysed and collated against considerations on unblinding and expectancy, choice of comparator, the definition of treatment frameworks, the characterisation of the subjective psychedelic experience and the specification of adverse events in relation to subjective psychedelic effects. Areas for future research, including long-term efficacy and safety and the influence of inter-individual differences, can be investigated in larger studies, necessary for marketing authorisation applications. Ultimately, balancing the intricacies of conducting trials with psychedelics with ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements can be facilitated by early dialogue with medicines regulators, and will be essential for the medical development of psychedelics to address unmet patient needs.
Research Summary of 'A review of psychedelics trials completed in depression, informed by European regulatory perspectives'
Introduction
Interest in the therapeutic use of psychedelics for mental health disorders, and depression in particular, has expanded rapidly, prompting regulatory bodies to respond. Classic psychedelics are typically defined by agonism at serotonin 2A receptors, and although no classic psychedelic currently has marketing authorisation, regulators in multiple jurisdictions have issued draft guidance or created special access pathways. Against a backdrop of substantial unmet need in depression, including a high prevalence and a large proportion of patients showing inadequate response to first-line antidepressants, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has proposed a draft revision of its guideline on clinical investigation of products for depression that includes preliminary considerations specific to psychedelic studies. Silva and colleagues set out to systematically evaluate the methodological approaches used in completed randomised controlled trials of psychedelics for major depressive disorder (MDD) or treatment-resistant depression (TRD), and to discuss how those approaches align with initial regulatory considerations in the EMA draft guideline. The review aimed to identify patterns and gaps across trial design, populations, interventions, outcome measurement and safety assessment that are relevant for future clinical development and regulatory submission of psychedelic medicines in the EU.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topics
- APA Citation
Silva, F., Butlen-Ducuing, F., Guizzaro, L., & Balabanov, P. (2025). A review of psychedelics trials completed in depression, informed by European regulatory perspectives. Neuroscience Applied, 4, 105516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nsa.2025.105516
Related Clinical Trials
References (17)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Breeksema, J. J., Kuin, B. W., Kamphuis, J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Butlen-Ducuing, F., McCulloch, D. E-W., Haberkamp, M. et al. · Lancet (2023)
Carbonaro, T. M., Bradstreet, M. P., Barrett, F. S. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)
Davis, A. K., Barrett, F. S., May, D. G. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2021)
Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2022)
Goodwin, G. M. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2023)
Davis, A. K., Streeter Barrett, F., Cosimano, M. P. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Jacobs, E., Murphy-Beiner, A., Rouiller, I. et al. · Neuroethics (2023)
Palhano-Fontes, F., Barreto, D., Onias, H. et al. · Psychological Medicine (2018)
Show all 17 referencesShow fewer
Peill, J. M., Marguilho, M., Erritzoe, D. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2024)
Raison, C. L., Sanacora, G., Woolley, J. D. et al. · JAMA (2023)
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Neil, J. C., Nutt, D. J. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Kometer, M. et al. · PLOS ONE (2012)
Schindowski, E. M., Jungwirth, J., Schuldt, A. et al. · EClinicalMedicine (2023)
Weiss, B., Leor Roseman, •., Giribaldi, B. et al. · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (2024)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.